scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question

Showing papers by "Keiran Raine published in 2014"


Journal ArticleDOI
Jose M. C. Tubio1, Yang Li1, Young Seok Ju1, Inigo Martincorena1, Susanna L. Cooke1, Marta Tojo2, Gunes Gundem1, Christodoulos P. Pipinikas3, Jorge Zamora1, Keiran Raine1, Andrew Menzies1, Pablo Román-García1, Anthony Fullam1, Moritz Gerstung1, Adam Shlien1, Patrick S. Tarpey1, Elli Papaemmanuil1, Stian Knappskog4, Stian Knappskog1, Stian Knappskog5, Peter Van Loo1, Peter Van Loo6, Manasa Ramakrishna1, Helen Davies1, John Marshall1, David C. Wedge1, Jon W. Teague1, Adam Butler1, Serena Nik-Zainal1, Serena Nik-Zainal7, Ludmil B. Alexandrov1, Sam Behjati1, Lucy R. Yates1, Niccolo Bolli7, Niccolo Bolli1, Laura Mudie1, Claire Hardy1, Sancha Martin1, Stuart McLaren1, Sarah O’Meara1, Elizabeth Anderson1, Mark Maddison1, Stephen J. Gamble1, Christopher S. Foster8, Anne Y. Warren7, Hayley C. Whitaker7, Daniel Brewer9, Daniel Brewer10, Rosalind A. Eeles10, Colin Cooper10, Colin Cooper9, David E. Neal7, Andy G. Lynch7, Tapio Visakorpi11, William B. Isaacs12, Laura Van't Veer13, Carlos Caldas7, Christine Desmedt14, Christos Sotiriou14, Samuel Aparicio, John A. Foekens15, Jorunn E. Eyfjord16, Sunil R. Lakhani17, Sunil R. Lakhani18, Gilles Thomas19, Ola Myklebost20, Paul N. Span21, Anne Lise Børresen-Dale20, Andrea L. Richardson22, Marc J. van de Vijver, Anne Vincent-Salomon23, Gert Van den Eynden, Adrienne M. Flanagan3, Adrienne M. Flanagan24, P. Andrew Futreal1, P. Andrew Futreal25, Sam M. Janes3, G. Steven Bova11, Michael R. Stratton1, Ultan McDermott1, Peter J. Campbell7, Peter J. Campbell1 
01 Aug 2014-Science
TL;DR: It is found that 3′ transduction activity in a patient’s tumor was always associated with hypomethylation of that element, and in some cases transduction events can scatter exons, genes, and regulatory elements widely across the genome.
Abstract: Long interspersed nuclear element-1 (L1) retrotransposons are mobile repetitive elements that are abundant in the human genome. L1 elements propagate through RNA intermediates. In the germ line, neighboring, nonrepetitive sequences are occasionally mobilized by the L1 machinery, a process called 3' transduction. Because 3' transductions are potentially mutagenic, we explored the extent to which they occur somatically during tumorigenesis. Studying cancer genomes from 244 patients, we found that tumors from 53% of the patients had somatic retrotranspositions, of which 24% were 3' transductions. Fingerprinting of donor L1s revealed that a handful of source L1 elements in a tumor can spawn from tens to hundreds of 3' transductions, which can themselves seed further retrotranspositions. The activity of individual L1 elements fluctuated during tumor evolution and correlated with L1 promoter hypomethylation. The 3' transductions disseminated genes, exons, and regulatory elements to new locations, most often to heterochromatic regions of the genome.

338 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: A remarkably parsimonious mutational process transforms ETV6-RUNX1–positive lymphoblasts, targeting the promoters, enhancers and first exons of genes that normally regulate B cell differentiation.
Abstract: The ETV6-RUNX1 fusion gene, found in 25% of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) cases, is acquired in utero but requires additional somatic mutations for overt leukemia. We used exome and low-coverage whole-genome sequencing to characterize secondary events associated with leukemic transformation. RAG-mediated deletions emerge as the dominant mutational process, characterized by recombination signal sequence motifs near breakpoints, incorporation of non-templated sequence at junctions, ∼30-fold enrichment at promoters and enhancers of genes actively transcribed in B cell development and an unexpectedly high ratio of recurrent to non-recurrent structural variants. Single-cell tracking shows that this mechanism is active throughout leukemic evolution, with evidence of localized clustering and reiterated deletions. Integration of data on point mutations and rearrangements identifies ATF7IP and MGA as two new tumor-suppressor genes in ALL. Thus, a remarkably parsimonious mutational process transforms ETV6-RUNX1-positive lymphoblasts, targeting the promoters, enhancers and first exons of genes that normally regulate B cell differentiation.

305 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Experimental model systems combined with genome sequencing can recapture and mechanistically explain mutational signatures associated with human disease.
Abstract: Mutation is associated with developmental and hereditary disorders, aging, and cancer. While we understand some mutational processes operative in human disease, most remain mysterious. We used Caenorhabditis elegans whole-genome sequencing to model mutational signatures, analyzing 183 worm populations across 17 DNA repair-deficient backgrounds propagated for 20 generations or exposed to carcinogens. The baseline mutation rate in C. elegans was approximately one per genome per generation, not overtly altered across several DNA repair deficiencies over 20 generations. Telomere erosion led to complex chromosomal rearrangements initiated by breakage–fusion–bridge cycles and completed by simultaneously acquired, localized clusters of breakpoints. Aflatoxin B1 induced substitutions of guanines in a GpC context, as observed in aflatoxin-induced liver cancers. Mutational burden increased with impaired nucleotide excision repair. Cisplatin and mechlorethamine, DNA crosslinking agents, caused dose- and genotype-dependent signatures among indels, substitutions, and rearrangements. Strikingly, both agents induced clustered rearrangements resembling “chromoanasynthesis,” a replication-based mutational signature seen in constitutional genomic disorders, suggesting that interstrand crosslinks may play a pathogenic role in such events. Cisplatin mutagenicity was most pronounced in xpf-1 mutants, suggesting that this gene critically protects cells against platinum chemotherapy. Thus, experimental model systems combined with genome sequencing can recapture and mechanistically explain mutational signatures associated with human disease.

167 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Genomic features mirror those of germline LINE element retrotranspositions, with frequent target-site duplications, consensus TTTTAA sites at insertion points, inverted rearrangements and polyA tails, and transcriptional consequences include expression of pseudogenes from UTRs or introns of target genes.
Abstract: Cancer evolves by mutation, with somatic reactivation of retrotransposons being one such mutational process. Germline retrotransposition can cause processed pseudogenes, but whether this occurs somatically has not been evaluated. Here we screen sequencing data from 660 cancer samples for somatically acquired pseudogenes. We find 42 events in 17 samples, especially non-small cell lung cancer (5/27) and colorectal cancer (2/11). Genomic features mirror those of germline LINE element retrotranspositions, with frequent target-site duplications (67%), consensus TTTTAA sites at insertion points, inverted rearrangements (21%), 5' truncation (74%) and polyA tails (88%). Transcriptional consequences include expression of pseudogenes from UTRs or introns of target genes. In addition, a somatic pseudogene that integrated into the promoter and first exon of the tumour suppressor gene, MGA, abrogated expression from that allele. Thus, formation of processed pseudogenes represents a new class of mutation occurring during cancer development, with potentially diverse functional consequences depending on genomic context.

91 citations


Posted ContentDOI
24 Dec 2014-bioRxiv
TL;DR: This benchmarking exercise has highlighted several fundamental parameters to consider in high-throughput sequencing, which will allow for better optimization and planning of both basic and translational studies.
Abstract: As next-generation sequencing becomes a clinical tool, a full understanding of the variables affecting sequencing analysis output is required. Through the International Cancer Genome Consortium (ICGC), we compared sequencing pipelines at five independent centers (CNAG, DKFZ, OICR, RIKEN and WTSI) using a single tumor-blood DNA pair. Analyses by each center and with one standardized algorithm revealed significant discrepancies. Although most pipelines performed well for coding mutations, library preparation methods and sequencing coverage metrics clearly influenced downstream results. PCR-free methods showed reduced GC-bias and more even coverage. Increasing sequencing depth to ~100x (about three times current standards) showed a benefit, as long as the tumor:control coverage ratio remained balanced. To become part of routine clinical care, high-throughput sequencing must be globally compatible and comparable. This benchmarking exercise has highlighted several fundamental parameters to consider in this regard, which will allow for better optimization and planning of both basic and translational studies.

13 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: A mouse model is described that allows multiple cancer mutations to be validated in each animal line using transposons, presenting a useful, generalised and efficient means for animal validation of cancer genes.
Abstract: The in vivo validation of cancer mutations and genes identified in cancer genomics is resource-intensive because of the low throughput of animal experiments. We describe a mouse model that allows multiple cancer mutations to be validated in each animal line. Animal lines are generated with multiple candidate cancer mutations using transposons. The candidate cancer genes are tagged and randomly expressed in somatic cells, allowing easy identification of the cancer genes involved in the generated tumours. This system presents a useful, generalised and efficient means for animal validation of cancer genes.

4 citations