Showing papers by "Michael D. Prados published in 2020"

Association of Maximal Extent of Resection of Contrast-Enhanced and Non-Contrast-Enhanced Tumor With Survival Within Molecular Subgroups of Patients With Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma.

Abstract: Importance Per the World Health Organization 2016 integrative classification, newly diagnosed glioblastomas are separated into isocitrate dehydrogenase gene 1 or 2 (IDH)–wild-type andIDH-mutant subtypes, with median patient survival of 1.2 and 3.6 years, respectively. Although maximal resection of contrast-enhanced (CE) tumor is associated with longer survival, the prognostic importance of maximal resection within molecular subgroups and the potential importance of resection of non–contrast-enhanced (NCE) disease is poorly understood. Objective To assess the association of resection of CE and NCE tumors in conjunction with molecular and clinical information to develop a new road map for cytoreductive surgery. Design, Setting, and Participants This retrospective, multicenter cohort study included a development cohort from the University of California, San Francisco (761 patients diagnosed from January 1, 1997, through December 31, 2017, with 9.6 years of follow-up) and validation cohorts from the Mayo Clinic (107 patients diagnosed from January 1, 2004, through December 31, 2014, with 5.7 years of follow-up) and the Ohio Brain Tumor Study (99 patients with data collected from January 1, 2008, through December 31, 2011, with a median follow-up of 10.9 months). Image accessors were blinded to patient groupings. Eligible patients underwent surgical resection for newly diagnosed glioblastoma and had available survival, molecular, and clinical data and preoperative and postoperative magnetic resonance images. Data were analyzed from November 15, 2018, to March 15, 2019. Main Outcomes and Measures Overall survival. Results Among the 761 patients included in the development cohort (468 [61.5%] men; median age, 60 [interquartile range, 51.6-67.7] years), younger patients withIDH–wild-type tumors and aggressive resection of CE and NCE tumors had survival similar to that of patients withIDH-mutant tumors (median overall survival [OS], 37.3 [95% CI, 31.6-70.7] months). Younger patients withIDH–wild-type tumors and reduction of CE tumor but residual NCE tumors fared worse (median OS, 16.5 [95% CI, 14.7-18.3] months). Older patients withIDH–wild-type tumors benefited from reduction of CE tumor (median OS, 12.4 [95% CI, 11.4-14.0] months). The results were validated in the 2 external cohorts. The association between aggressive CE and NCE in patients withIDH–wild-type tumors was not attenuated by the methylation status of the promoter region of the DNA repair enzyme O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase. Conclusions and Relevance This study confirms an association between maximal resection of CE tumor and OS in patients with glioblastoma across all subgroups. In addition, maximal resection of NCE tumor was associated with longer OS in younger patients, regardless ofIDHstatus, and among patients withIDH–wild-type glioblastoma regardless of the methylation status of the promoter region of the DNA repair enzyme O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase. These conclusions may help reassess surgical strategies for individual patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma.

Mass cytometry detects H3.3K27M-specific vaccine responses in diffuse midline glioma

Abstract: BACKGROUNDPatients with diffuse midline gliomas (DMGs), including diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG), have dismal outcomes. We previously described the H3.3K27M mutation as a shared neoantigen in HLA-A*02.01+, H3.3K27M+ DMGs. Within the Pacific Pediatric Neuro-Oncology Consortium, we assessed the safety and efficacy of an H3.3K27M-targeted peptide vaccine.METHODSNewly diagnosed patients, aged 3-21 years, with HLA-A*02.01+ and H3.3K27M+ status were enrolled in stratum A (DIPG) or stratum B (nonpontine DMG). Vaccine was administered in combination with polyinosinic-polycytidylic acid-poly-I-lysine carboxymethylcellulose (poly-ICLC) every 3 weeks for 8 cycles, followed by once every 6 weeks. Immunomonitoring and imaging were performed every 3 months. Imaging was centrally reviewed. Immunological responses were assessed in PBMCs using mass cytometry.RESULTSA total of 19 patients were enrolled in stratum A (median age,11 years) and 10 in stratum B (median age, 13 years). There were no grade-4 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). Injection site reaction was the most commonly reported TRAE. Overall survival (OS) at 12 months was 40% (95% CI, 22%-73%) for patients in stratum A and 39% (95% CI, 16%-93%) for patients in stratum B. The median OS was 16.1 months for patients who had an expansion of H3.3K27M-reactive CD8+ T cells compared with 9.8 months for their counterparts (P = 0.05). Patients with DIPG with below-median baseline levels of myeloid-derived suppressor cells had prolonged OS compared with their counterparts (P < 0.01). Immediate pretreatment dexamethasone administration was inversely associated with H3.3K27M-reactive CD8+ T cell responses.CONCLUSIONAdministration of the H3.3K27M-specific vaccine was well tolerated. Patients with H3.3K27M-specific CD8+ immunological responses demonstrated prolonged OS compared with nonresponders.TRIAL REGISTRATIONClinicalTrials.gov NCT02960230.FUNDINGThe V Foundation, the Pacific Pediatric Neuro-Oncology Consortium Foundation, the Pediatric Brain Tumor Foundation, the Mithil Prasad Foundation, the MCJ Amelior Foundation, the Anne and Jason Farber Foundation, Will Power Research Fund Inc., the Isabella Kerr Molina Foundation, the Parker Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, and the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS), NIH (R35NS105068).

Phase I study of vemurafenib in children with recurrent or progressive BRAFV600E mutant brain tumors: Pacific Pediatric Neuro-Oncology Consortium study (PNOC-002).

Abstract: Background: BRAFV600E mutation is present in a subset of pediatric brain tumors. Vemurafenib is an oral, selective ATP-competitive inhibitor of BRAFV600E kinase. The goal of this multi-center study conducted through the Pacific Pediatric Neuro-Oncology Consortium (PNOC) was to determine the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) and dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) in children < 18 years with recurrent or progressive BRAFV600E mutant brain tumors. Results: Nineteen eligible patients were enrolled. Eleven patients had received three or more prior therapies. Data reported are from the start of treatment for the first patient (April 30 2014) through August 31 2019. The RP2D was defined as 550 mg/m2 twice daily after DLT criteria adjustment for rash. Related grade ≥ 3 adverse events included secondary keratoacanthoma (n = 1); rash (n =16); and fever (n = 5). Subjects received a median of 23 cycles (range 3-63). Four patients remain on treatment. Centrally reviewed best radiographic responses included 1 complete response, 5 partial responses, and 13 stable disease. The steady-state area under the curve (AUC0-∞median) was 604 mg*h/L (range 329-1052). Methods: Vemurafenib was given starting at 550 mg/m2, twice daily which corresponds to the adult RP2D. Adverse events were graded using the NIH Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0. Central imaging review was performed. Pharmacokinetic sampling was performed. Conclusions: Vemurafenib has promising anti-tumor activity in recurrent BRAF V600E-positive brain tumors with manageable toxicity. A phase 2 study is ongoing (NCT01748149).

Neuro-Oncology Practice Clinical Debate: targeted therapy vs conventional chemotherapy in pediatric low-grade glioma.

Abstract: The treatment of children with low-grade glioma has evolved over the last several decades, beginning initially with focal radiotherapy, which has now been largely replaced by systemic treatment with conventional chemotherapy agents or more recently molecularly targeted therapeutics. A consensus standard of care is not well defined, leaving clinicians and parents to choose from an increasing number of options, often without complete information concerning the associated risks and benefits. Issues critical to this topic include timing of interventions (when to treat), preservation of neurological function (goals of treatment), choice of initial therapy strategy (conventional cytotoxic chemotherapy vs molecularly targeted therapy), duration of treatment (how long, and what clinical or imaging endpoints to consider), and perhaps most important, risk reduction relative to anticipated benefit. The groups from the University of California, San Francisco and Dana Farber Cancer Institute, moderated by Michael Prados, herein debate the merits of cytotoxic chemotherapy and targeted therapeutics as initial treatment strategies in pediatric low-grade glioma, a topic discussed daily in Tumor Boards across the United States and abroad. Prospective, randomized, phase 3 trials comparing the 2 strategies, conducted within homogenous disease settings, with consistently evaluated functional and imaging endpoints, are not available to guide the risks/benefit discussion. As is often the case in rare biologically diverse diseases, in a vulnerable population, therapy decisions are frequently based on incomplete data, physician experience, bias to some degree, and patient/family preference.

Temporospatial genomic profiling in glioblastoma identifies commonly altered core pathways underlying tumor progression.

Abstract: Author(s): Blomquist, Mylan R; Ensign, Shannon Fortin; D'Angelo, Fulvio; Phillips, Joanna J; Ceccarelli, Michele; Peng, Sen; Halperin, Rebecca F; Caruso, Francesca P; Garofano, Luciano; Byron, Sara A; Liang, Winnie S; Craig, David W; Carpten, John D; Prados, Michael D; Trent, Jeffrey M; Berens, Michael E; Iavarone, Antonio; Dhruv, Harshil; Tran, Nhan L | Abstract: BackgroundTumor heterogeneity underlies resistance and disease progression in glioblastoma (GBM), and tumors most commonly recur adjacent to the surgical resection margins in contrast non-enhancing (NE) regions. To date, no targeted therapies have meaningfully altered overall patient survival in the up-front setting. The aim of this study was to characterize intratumoral heterogeneity in recurrent GBM using bulk samples from primary resection and recurrent samples taken from contrast-enhancing (EN) and contrast NE regions.MethodsWhole exome and RNA sequencing were performed on matched bulk primary and multiple recurrent EN and NE tumor samples from 16 GBM patients who received standard of care treatment alone or in combination with investigational clinical trial regimens.ResultsPrivate mutations emerge across multi-region sampling in recurrent tumors. Genomic clonal analysis revealed increased enrichment in gene alterations regulating the G2M checkpoint, Kras signaling, Wnt signaling, and DNA repair in recurrent disease. Subsequent functional studies identified augmented PI3K/AKT transcriptional and protein activity throughout progression, validated by phospho-protein levels. Moreover, a mesenchymal transcriptional signature was observed in recurrent EN regions, which differed from the proneural signature in recurrent NE regions.ConclusionsSubclonal populations observed within bulk resected primary GBMs transcriptionally evolve across tumor recurrence (EN and NE regions) and exhibit aberrant gene expression of common signaling pathways that persist despite standard or targeted therapy. Our findings provide evidence that there are both adaptive and clonally mediated dependencies of GBM on key pathways, such as the PI3K/AKT axis, for survival across recurrences.

Ddre-21. pnoc015: phase 1 study of mtx110 delivered by convection enhanced delivery (ced) in children with newly diagnosed diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (dipg) previously treated with radiation therapy

Abstract: To determine safety and distribution of MTX110 delivered by CED in newly diagnosed DIPG patients. DIPG patients (3–21 years) were enrolled after radiation. CED of MTX110 combined with gadoteridol was completed based on dose levels (DL) (30–90 µM with volumes ranging from 3 cc (single dose) to 2 consecutive doses of 6 cc; total number of DL=7). Catheter position was chosen to maximize tumor coverage. Distribution of infusate was monitored with real-time MR imaging. Repeat CED was performed every 4–8 weeks if tolerated. Quality of life (QOL) assessments using PedsQL Generic Core and Brain Tumor modules were obtained at baseline (n=5), 3-months (n=3), and end of therapy (n=2). Single-cell RNA sequencing and analysis of histone modifications was performed to assess pharmacodynamic effects on DIPG cells. Between May 2018-Dec 2019, 6 patients were enrolled (median age 8 years, range 5–21). Dose limiting toxicities included: grade 3 gait disturbance (DL7; cycle 1); grade 3 muscle weakness/vagus nerve disorder (DL5; cycle 4) and grade 2 intolerable dysphagia (DL7; cycle 4). Twelve CED procedures were completed at DL7 and repeated cycles ranged from 2 to 7. Infusion to distribution volume ratio was approximately 1:3.5. There were no significant changes in self-reported QOL. Parent ratings of patients’ worry (p = 0.04) and overall QOL (p = 0.03) significantly decreased at 3-months. Repeat CED of MTX110 at the highest dose is tolerable. Tissue concentrations are likely to be substantially higher compared to oral dosing. Pharmacodynamic effects will be presented.

Phase I/II study of sorafenib in combination with erlotinib for recurrent glioblastoma as part of a 3-arm sequential accrual clinical trial: NABTC 05-02

Abstract: Background Receptor tyrosine kinases such as epidermal growth factor receptors (EGFRs) and their downstream signaling pathways such as the Ras-Raf-mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway play important roles in glioblastoma (GBM). This study investigated the safety, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy of sorafenib (Ras/Raf/MAPK inhibitor) in combination with erlotinib (EGFR inhibitor) for treatment of recurrent GBMs. Methods Patients with recurrent GBM were eligible. A novel sequential accrual trial design was used, where patients were sequentially accrued into separate treatment arms in phase I and phase II investigations to optimize recruitment efficiency. In phase I, a standard 3 + 3 format was used to identify dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), determine maximum tolerated dose (MTD), and investigate pharmacokinetics. Phase II followed a 2-stage design with the primary endpoint being 6-month progression-free survival (PFS6). Results Sixteen patients were recruited for phase I, and the MTD was determined to be sorafenib 200 mg twice daily and erlotinib 100 mg once daily. DLTs include Grade 3 hypertension, Grade 3 elevated liver transaminases, and Grade 4 elevated lipase. While erlotinib did not affect sorafenib levels, sorafenib reduced erlotinib levels. In phase II, 3 of 19 stage 1 participants were progression free at 6 months. This did not meet the predetermined efficacy endpoint, and the trial was terminated. Conclusion This study identified the MTD and DLTs for sorafenib and erlotinib combination therapy for recurrent GBMs; however, efficacy data did not meet the primary endpoint. This study also demonstrates the feasibility of a novel sequential accrual clinical trial design that optimizes patient recruitment for multiarm studies, which is particularly effective for multicenter clinical trials.

Population Pharmacokinetics of Vemurafenib in Children With Recurrent/Refractory BRAF Gene V600E-Mutant Astrocytomas

Abstract: Vemurafenib (Zelboraf) is an orally available BRAFV600E inhibitor approved for the treatment of unresectable or metastatic BRAFV600E -mutant melanoma. The primary objective of this work was to characterize the pharmacokinetics (PK) of vemurafenib in pediatric patients with recurrent/refractory astrocytomas harboring the BRAFV600E mutation. The study was also designed to evaluate the feasibility of replacing whole vemurafenib tablets with crushed tablets in young children unable to swallow tablets. Twenty-five pediatric patients (median age, 8.8 years; range, 3.3-19.2) with recurrent/refractory BRAFV600E -mutant astrocytomas received whole (n = 19) or crushed (n = 6) vemurafenib tablets twice daily. Plasma samples were collected on days 1, 15, and 22 in cycle 1 of vemurafenib treatment. Descriptive PK analyses demonstrated significant variability (approximately 6-fold) in drug exposure. A 1-compartment model with first-order absorption and elimination was developed by adjusting the vemurafenib PK model previously validated in adults with mutant BRAFV600E melanoma. After inclusion of allometric scaling on total body weight, the model adequately described the PK of vemurafenib in children between a wide age range of 3 to 19 years old. In the crushed-tablet cohort, relative bioavailability was approximately 96% (95% confidence interval, 49%-142%) compared to that seen in pediatric patients receiving whole tablets based on the preliminary comparison analysis results. Moderate intrapatient variability (48%) of vemurafenib clearance was observed. There was significant correlation (R2 = 0.83) between area under the plasma concentration-time curve and trough concentration at steady state. These results will help increase the number of pediatric patients for whom vemurafenib is accessible and facilitate improved dosing in pediatric patients with recurrent/refractory BRAFV600E astrocytomas.

LGG-53. PNOC001 (NCT01734512): A PHASE II STUDY OF EVEROLIMUS FOR RECURRENT OR PROGRESSIVE PEDIATRIC LOW-GRADE GLIOMAS (pLGG)

Abstract: To estimate the 6-month Progression Free Survival (PFS6) associated with everolimus for progressive/recurrent pLGGs and to determine if activated PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway as measured by positive phosphorylated-ribosomal protein S6 (p-RPS6) status was associated with response. Patients 3–21 years of age with recurrent or progressive pLGG were enrolled. Everolimus was administered orally at 5 mg/m2 daily. Tissue availability for molecular analysis was mandatory. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) for p-RPS6 was performed centrally. An adaptive Simon two-stage design was employed based on p-RPS6 status. Based on results of the first stage, enrollment in the second stage was either limited to pathway activated patients or open to all subjects. From December 2012 to July 2019 a total of 65 subjects enrolled [median age 9 years (range 3–19); 43% female]. As of December 15, 2019 median number of treatment cycle is 8 (range 1–24); 7 patients remain on treatment. Toxicity profile is similar to published reports with rash and elevated lipid profiles as most common adverse events. PFS6 for the entire cohort is 63%; PFS6 is 64% for the activated and 61% for the non-activated patients. Central imaging review (n=52) revealed 1 partial response, 1 complete response, 33 stable disease, and 17 progressive disease at the end of study treatment. Initial molecular analysis identified BRAF alterations in 35/65 patients. Everolimus is well tolerated and active in a subset of pLGGs. Ongoing analyses will assess predictive biomarkers of response and will be reported at the meeting.

Img-04. response assessment in pediatric high-grade glioma: recommendations from the response assessment in pediatric neuro-oncology working group

Abstract: Abstract INTRODUCTION Pediatric low-grade gliomas (pLGG) show clinical and biological features that are distinct from their adult counterparts. Consequently, additional considerations are needed for response assessment in children compared to the established adult Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) criteria. Standardized response criteria in pediatric clinical trials are lacking, complicating comparisons of responses across studies. We therefore established an international committee of the Radiologic Assessment in Pediatric Neuro-Oncology (RAPNO) working group to develop consensus recommendations for response assessment in pLGG. METHODS The committee consisted of 25 international experts in the areas of Pediatric Neuro-Oncology, Neuroradiology and Neurosurgery. The committee first developed a set of agreed upon topics they deemed necessary to understand the controversies of imaging utilization and assessment in pLGG. These topics were divided up among the committee members who presented all available literature to the entire RAPNO committee via web teleconference. Once presented, the group discussed these data and developed consensus statements and recommendations based on available literature, committee expertise and clinical experience. Each topic was discussed until a consensus was reached. RESULTS Final consensus included recommendations about the following topics: specific imaging sequences, advanced imaging techniques, NF1-associated pLGG, molecular and histologic classification, assessment of cysts, vision and other functional outcomes as well as overall radiologic response assessment. CONCLUSIONS The RAPNO pLGG consensus establishes systemic recommendations that represent an initial effort to uniformly collect and assess response in pLGG. These recommendations should now be evaluated internationally and prospectively in an effort to assess clinical utility, validate and modify as appropriate.