scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

The Lodge

About: The Lodge is a based out in . It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Biodiversity. The organization has 258 authors who have published 394 publications receiving 17100 citations.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Adriana De Palma1, Adriana De Palma2, Stefan Abrahamczyk3, Marcelo A. Aizen4, Matthias Albrecht, Yves Basset5, Adam J. Bates6, Robin J. Blake7, Céline Boutin8, Rob Bugter9, Stuart Connop10, Leopoldo Cruz-López, Saul A. Cunningham11, Ben Darvill12, Tim Diekötter13, Tim Diekötter14, Silvia Dorn13, Nicola Downing15, Martin H. Entling16, Nina Farwig17, Antonio Felicioli18, Steven J. Fonte19, Robert E. Fowler20, Markus Franzén21, Dave Goulson20, Ingo Grass22, Mick E. Hanley23, Stephen D. Hendrix24, Farina Herrmann22, Felix Herzog, Andrea Holzschuh25, Birgit Jauker26, Michael Kessler, Mairi E. Knight23, Andreas Kruess27, Patrick Lavelle28, Patrick Lavelle29, Violette Le Féon30, Pia E. Lentini31, Louise A. Malone32, Jon Marshall, Eliana Martinez Pachon33, Quinn S. McFrederick34, Carolina L. Morales4, Sonja Mudri-Stojnic35, Guiomar Nates-Parra33, Sven G. Nilsson36, Erik Öckinger37, Lynne M. Osgathorpe38, Alejandro Parra-H33, Carlos A. Peres39, Anna Persson36, Theodora Petanidou40, Katja Poveda41, Eileen F. Power42, Marino Quaranta43, Carolina Quintero4, Romina Rader44, Miriam H. Richards45, T'ai H. Roulston46, Laurent Rousseau47, Jonathan P. Sadler48, Ulrika Samnegård49, Nancy A. Schellhorn11, Christof Schüepp50, Oliver Schweiger21, Allan H. Smith-Pardo33, Allan H. Smith-Pardo51, Ingolf Steffan-Dewenter25, Jane C. Stout42, Rebecca K. Tonietto52, Rebecca K. Tonietto53, Teja Tscharntke22, Jason M. Tylianakis2, Jason M. Tylianakis54, Hans Verboven55, Carlos H. Vergara56, Jort Verhulst, Catrin Westphal22, Hyung Joo Yoon, Andy Purvis2, Andy Purvis1 
American Museum of Natural History1, Imperial College London2, University of Bonn3, National University of Comahue4, Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute5, Nottingham Trent University6, University of Reading7, Carleton University8, Wageningen University and Research Centre9, University of East London10, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation11, British Trust for Ornithology12, ETH Zurich13, University of Kiel14, Royal Society for the Protection of Birds15, University of Koblenz and Landau16, University of Marburg17, University of Pisa18, Colorado State University19, University of Sussex20, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ21, University of Göttingen22, University of Plymouth23, University of Iowa24, University of Würzburg25, University of Giessen26, Federal Agency for Nature Conservation27, International Center for Tropical Agriculture28, Institut de recherche pour le développement29, Institut national de la recherche agronomique30, University of Melbourne31, Plant & Food Research32, National University of Colombia33, University of California, Riverside34, University of Novi Sad35, Lund University36, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences37, The Lodge38, University of East Anglia39, University of the Aegean40, Cornell University41, Trinity College, Dublin42, Canadian Real Estate Association43, University of New England (Australia)44, Brock University45, University of Virginia46, Université du Québec à Montréal47, University of Birmingham48, Stockholm University49, University of Bern50, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service51, Northwestern University52, Saint Louis University53, University of Canterbury54, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven55, Universidad de las Américas Puebla56
TL;DR: Analysis of a global dataset of bee diversity at sites facing land-use change and intensification suggests that global extrapolation of models based on geographically and taxonomic restricted data may underestimate the true uncertainty, increasing the risk of ecological surprises.
Abstract: Land-use change and intensification threaten bee populations worldwide, imperilling pollination services. Global models are needed to better characterise, project, and mitigate bees' responses to these human impacts. The available data are, however, geographically and taxonomically unrepresentative; most data are from North America and Western Europe, overrepresenting bumblebees and raising concerns that model results may not be generalizable to other regions and taxa. To assess whether the geographic and taxonomic biases of data could undermine effectiveness of models for conservation policy, we have collated from the published literature a global dataset of bee diversity at sites facing land-use change and intensification, and assess whether bee responses to these pressures vary across 11 regions (Western, Northern, Eastern and Southern Europe; North, Central and South America; Australia and New Zealand; South East Asia; Middle and Southern Africa) and between bumblebees and other bees. Our analyses highlight strong regionally-based responses of total abundance, species richness and Simpson's diversity to land use, caused by variation in the sensitivity of species and potentially in the nature of threats. These results suggest that global extrapolation of models based on geographically and taxonomically restricted data may underestimate the true uncertainty, increasing the risk of ecological surprises.

85 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The authors assess whether species listed on Annex I of the European Union (EU) Birds Directive, for which EU Member States are obliged to implement special conservation measures, differ systematically in their short-term or long-term population trends from those of non-Annex I species.
Abstract: International legislation forms a cornerstone of conservation, yet its efficacy is rarely quantified. We assess whether species listed on Annex I of the European Union (EU) Birds Directive, for which EU Member States are obliged to implement special conservation measures, differ systematically in their short-term (2001-2012) or long-term (1980-2012) population trends from those of non-Annex I species. In both periods, Annex I species had more positive trends than non-Annex I species, particularly in countries that joined the EU earlier. There were additional signatures of climate change and life history strategy in the trends of species in one or both periods. Within Annex I species, long-distance migrants fared significantly worse than other species, suggesting that enhanced protection on the breeding grounds alone may be insufficient for these species. We conclude that the EU's conservation legislation has had a demonstrably positive impact on target species, even during a period in which climate change has significantly affected populations.

83 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors review the delivery of ecosystem services from Enclosed Farmland in the UK, and explore how the expected demands for ecosystem services might be met in the future.

81 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors compare methods to compute multispecies supranational indices and explore different approaches to trend and error estimation, the presentation of indices, and species selection.

81 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: To examine quantitatively the evolution of bird atlas methods, from their inception to the present day, to document the most frequently used methods and to quantify temporal changes in them, and so identify broad patterns that might be of use in the planning and interpretation of future atlases.
Abstract: Capsule An increasing proportion of atlases now map patterns of abundance but they are still a minority even though they require no more input of time or fieldworkers. Aims To examine quantitatively the evolution of bird atlas methods, from their inception to the present day, to document the most frequently used methods and to quantify temporal changes in them, and so identify broad patterns that might be of use in the planning and interpretation of future atlases. Methods A database of over 400 atlases was compiled, and a number of variables extracted from each. Temporal trends within, and relationships between, these variables were analysed. Results Atlases have become significantly reduced in scale over time, covering smaller areas in shorter periods of fieldwork, but at higher spatial resolutions and with increasing numbers of observers per unit area. The number of participating fieldworkers and the size of the region being covered together explain over 70% of variation between atlases in spatial reso...

80 citations


Authors

Showing all 258 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
Rhys E. Green7828530428
Richard D. Gregory6116518428
Deborah J. Pain46996717
Jeremy D. Wilson4512312587
Richard B. Bradbury421138062
Paul F. Donald4111711153
Geoff M. Hilton32883323
David W. Gibbons32528647
Norman Ratcliffe311022526
Paul E. Bellamy30763348
Mark Bolton30943336
Ruud P. B. Foppen30785560
Steffen Oppel291212950
Shelley A. Hinsley29823309
Arjun Amar291223202
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
The Nature Conservancy
3.7K papers, 202K citations

79% related

Wildlife Conservation Society
4.9K papers, 243.8K citations

78% related

Landcare Research
5.1K papers, 250.8K citations

78% related

Royal Botanic Gardens
6.8K papers, 257.4K citations

77% related

United States Forest Service
21.8K papers, 959.1K citations

77% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
20221
202127
202025
201927
201819
201727