A liver-on-a-chip platform with bioprinted hepatic spheroids.
read more
Citations
Bioprinting 3D microfibrous scaffolds for engineering endothelialized myocardium and heart-on-a-chip.
Progress in 3D bioprinting technology for tissue/organ regenerative engineering
Functional and Biomimetic Materials for Engineering of the Three-Dimensional Cell Microenvironment
Multisensor-integrated organs-on-chips platform for automated and continual in situ monitoring of organoid behaviors
Biofabrication strategies for 3D in vitro models and regenerative medicine
References
The origins and the future of microfluidics
3D bioprinting of tissues and organs
Reconstituting Organ-Level Lung Functions on a Chip
Hydrogels in regenerative medicine
Microfluidic organs-on-chips
Related Papers (5)
Frequently Asked Questions (22)
Q2. What future works have the authors mentioned in the paper "A liver-on-a-chip platform with bioprinted hepatic spheroids" ?
The response of the liver-on-achip platform to APAP treatment was similar to animal and in vitro models, which confirms the possibility of its application for drug toxicity analysis. The proposed concept of a bioreactor interfaced with bioprinters expands the field of organ-on-a-chip and may be a key step towards the fabrication of automated systems for high throughput drug screening.
Q3. What equations were used for modeling of flow and oxygen transport in channels and chamber?
In particular, Navier Stokes equations with no slip boundary condition and convection–diffusion equation were used for modeling of flow and oxygen transport in channels and chamber.
Q4. What is the way to validate the drug toxicity data?
For advancedmetabolic studies, hepatic constructs with primary hepatocytes, which have higher metabolic activity, should be employed to validate the drug toxicity data.
Q5. What is the effect of reducing the size of spheroids?
Increasing the perfusion rate or reducing the size of spheroids at the start of culture period to compensate for the oxygen deprivation within the spheroid core could potentially increase the cellular activity over long-term culture periods.
Q6. What is the role of the bioreactor in hepatic spheroids?
Functionality of hepatic spheroids cultured in the bioreactor Maintaining the functionality of the hepatic construct in the bioreactor is critical for its application as a drugtesting platform.
Q7. What is the role of bioprinting in the development of 3D structures?
the encapsulation of cell spheroids within hydrogels that are compatible with rapid fabrication techniques including bioprinting, enables the fabrication of complex architectures similar to those observed in vivo.
Q8. What are the main issues with the use of primary hepatocytes?
issues with cost, availability and batch-to-batch variability make primary hepatocytes a challenging cell source to use.
Q9. What is the importance of a bioreactor for assessing tissue behavior?
a bioreactor that allows easy access to the hepatic construct within the bioreactor without compromising the construct is highly desirable for assessing tissue behavior at multiple time points during the long-term culture period.
Q10. What is the role of bioprinting in the organ-ona-chip field?
Bioprinting hydrogel-based hepatic constructs in the bioreactor Interfacing bioreactors and 3D bioprinters bring the opportunity of fabricating sophisticated constructs in the future, which is one of the challenges in organ-ona-chip field.
Q11. What are the main challenges associated with the use of primary hepatocytes?
In addition to their limited lifespan, difficulty in obtaining the cell source and large batch-to-batch variability post-isolation are other important challenges associated with the use of primary hepatocytes.
Q12. what is the idea of a bioreactor interfaced with bioprinters?
The proposed concept of a bioreactor interfaced with bioprinters expands the field of organ-on-a-chip and may be a key step towards the fabrication of automated systems for high throughput drug screening.
Q13. What is the role of spheroids in the development of 3D cell culture models?
Among various 3D cell culturemodels, multicellular spheroids, formed by aggregation of cells compacted together by self-secreted ECM, have recently been the focus of a number of studies [32–37].
Q14. How much albumin was secreted by the cells on day 1?
The albumin secreted by the cells (pg/cell/day) in the bioreactor was 20±3 on day 1, 8±2 on day 7, 5±0.5 on day 15, 2.5±0.1 on day 21 and 2.3±0.1 on day 30.
Q15. What is the reason for the failure of the current drug development process?
The current drug development process suffers from a high failure rate during clinical trials, which is partly due to inadequacy of animal models to accurately predict the toxic side-effects of drugs in humans [1, 2].
Q16. How did Esch et al study the metabolic activity of multicellular 3D he?
Esch et al reported that bi-directional fluidic flow enhanced the metabolic activity of multi-cellular 3D hepatic tissue cultured for 14 days as observed with unidirectional flow [27].
Q17. What is the bioreactor for hepatocytes?
The employed bioprinting approach and the designed bioreactor is robust for extending the hepatic construct to primary cells in mono-culture and co-cultures with other parenchymal cell types tomove towardsmore biomimetic liver-on-a-chip platforms.
Q18. What was the cellular metabolic activity of the bioreactor culture?
The metabolic activity decreased by 63±2% on day 6 compared to day 0 for the APAP treated bioreactor cultures, whereas for no drug control the metabolic activity increased by 78±4% as compared to day 0 (figure 4(a)).
Q19. How was the APAP dose response curve calculated?
From the dose response curve, a concentration of 15 mM was selected to induce acute APAP toxicity in the bioreactor culture and the functionality of the construct was monitored over 6 days of culture at multiple time-points.
Q20. What was the design of the bioreactor?
The designed bioreactor consisted of multilayers of polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) and poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) and included three chambers connected by fluidic channels as shown in figures S1(a) and (b) in ESI.
Q21. What did the researchers use for the encapsulation of the hydrogel?
Although cell secreted proteins interact with the porous hydrogel scaffold, the authors used the same encapsulation conditions for control and experimental groups, so that these conditions did not affect the results.
Q22. What was the dose-response of the spheroids?
For static dose-response experiments, spheroids were encapsulated in GelMA and bioprinted onto glass slides grafted with 3-(trimethoxysilyl) propyl methacrylate.