scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

Capecitabine and cisplatin with or without cetuximab for patients with previously untreated advanced gastric cancer (EXPAND): a randomised, open-label phase 3 trial

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
Addition of cetuximab to capecitabine-cisplatin provided no additional benefit to chemotherapy alone in the first-line treatment of advanced gastric cancer in the EXPAND trial.
Abstract
Summary Background Patients with advanced gastric cancer have a poor prognosis and few efficacious treatment options. We aimed to assess the addition of cetuximab to capecitabine-cisplatin chemotherapy in patients with advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer. Methods In our open-label, randomised phase 3 trial (EXPAND), we enrolled adults aged 18 years or older with histologically confirmed locally advanced unresectable (M0) or metastatic (M1) adenocarcinoma of the stomach or gastro-oesophageal junction. We enrolled patients at 164 sites (teaching hospitals and clinics) in 25 countries, and randomly assigned eligible participants (1:1) to receive first-line chemotherapy with or without cetuximab. Randomisation was done with a permuted block randomisation procedure (variable block size), stratified by disease stage (M0 vs M1), previous oesophagectomy or gastrectomy (yes vs no), and previous (neo)adjuvant (radio)chemotherapy (yes vs no). Treatment consisted of 3-week cycles of twice-daily capecitabine 1000 mg/m 2 (on days 1–14) and intravenous cisplatin 80 mg/m 2 (on day 1), with or without weekly cetuximab (400 mg/m 2 initial infusion on day 1 followed by 250 mg/m 2 per week thereafter). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), assessed by a masked independent review committee in the intention-to-treat population. We assessed safety in all patients who received at least one dose of study drug. This study is registered at EudraCT, number 2007-004219-75. Findings Between June 30, 2008, and Dec 15, 2010, we enrolled 904 patients. Median PFS for 455 patients allocated capecitabine-cisplatin plus cetuximab was 4·4 months (95% CI 4·2–5·5) compared with 5·6 months (5·1–5·7) for 449 patients who were allocated to receive capecitabine-cisplatin alone (hazard ratio 1·09, 95% CI 0·92–1·29; p=0·32). 369 (83%) of 446 patients in the chemotherapy plus cetuximab group and 337 (77%) of 436 patients in the chemotherapy group had grade 3–4 adverse events, including grade 3–4 diarrhoea, hypokalaemia, hypomagnesaemia, rash, and hand-foot syndrome. Grade 3–4 neutropenia was more common in controls than in patients who received cetuximab. Incidence of grade 3–4 skin reactions and acne-like rash was substantially higher in the cetuximab-containing regimen than in the control regimen. 239 (54%) of 446 in the cetuximab group and 194 (44%) of 436 in the control group had any grade of serious adverse event. Interpretation Addition of cetuximab to capecitabine-cisplatin provided no additional benefit to chemotherapy alone in the first-line treatment of advanced gastric cancer in our trial. Funding Merck KGaA.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

RANKL/RANK pathway abrogates cetuximab sensitivity in gastric cancer cells via activation of EGFR and c-Src

TL;DR: The results suggest that in GC cells, the RANKL/RANK pathway activates the EGFR pathway and thereby causes resistance to anti-EGFR treatments.
Journal ArticleDOI

Cetuximab plus pemetrexed as second-line therapy for fluorouracil-based pre-treated metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

TL;DR: A combination of cetuximab plus pemetrexed was marginally effective and well tolerated in patients with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma as the second-line treatment.
Journal ArticleDOI

Management of gastric cancer: East vs West.

TL;DR: Differences in epidemiology, clinicopathologic presentation, treatment approach, and survival outcomes between the east and the west are described.
Journal ArticleDOI

Advancing pharmacological treatment options for advanced gastric cancer.

TL;DR: It is important to identify predictive biomarkers to enrich an appropriate patient population for targeted agents such as HER2 status for trastuzumab, as most trials have failed to demonstrate a benefit of targeted agents.
Journal ArticleDOI

Suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid enhances the antitumor activity of oxaliplatin by reversing the oxaliplatin‑induced Src activation in gastric cancer cells.

TL;DR: Oxaliplatin and SAHA exhibited a positive interaction when used in combination and were found to suppress gastric cancer cell survival and growth.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008.

TL;DR: The results for 20 world regions are presented, summarizing the global patterns for the eight most common cancers, and striking differences in the patterns of cancer from region to region are observed.
Journal ArticleDOI

New Guidelines to Evaluate the Response to Treatment in Solid Tumors

TL;DR: A model by which a combined assessment of all existing lesions, characterized by target lesions and nontarget lesions, is used to extrapolate an overall response to treatment is proposed, which is largely validated by the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Group and integrated into the present guidelines.
Journal ArticleDOI

Platinum-Based Chemotherapy plus Cetuximab in Head and Neck Cancer

TL;DR: Adding cetuximab to platinum-based chemotherapy with fluorouracil (platinum-fluorouracils) significantly prolonged the median overall survival and improved overall survival when given as first-line treatment in patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck.
Journal ArticleDOI

Capecitabine and oxaliplatin for advanced esophagogastric cancer.

TL;DR: Capecitabine and oxaliplatin are as effective as fluorouracil and cisplatin, respectively, in patients with previously untreated esophagogastric cancer, in a two-by-two design.
Related Papers (5)

Comprehensive molecular characterization of gastric adenocarcinoma

Adam J. Bass, +257 more
- 11 Sep 2014 -