scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

Capecitabine and cisplatin with or without cetuximab for patients with previously untreated advanced gastric cancer (EXPAND): a randomised, open-label phase 3 trial

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
Addition of cetuximab to capecitabine-cisplatin provided no additional benefit to chemotherapy alone in the first-line treatment of advanced gastric cancer in the EXPAND trial.
Abstract
Summary Background Patients with advanced gastric cancer have a poor prognosis and few efficacious treatment options. We aimed to assess the addition of cetuximab to capecitabine-cisplatin chemotherapy in patients with advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer. Methods In our open-label, randomised phase 3 trial (EXPAND), we enrolled adults aged 18 years or older with histologically confirmed locally advanced unresectable (M0) or metastatic (M1) adenocarcinoma of the stomach or gastro-oesophageal junction. We enrolled patients at 164 sites (teaching hospitals and clinics) in 25 countries, and randomly assigned eligible participants (1:1) to receive first-line chemotherapy with or without cetuximab. Randomisation was done with a permuted block randomisation procedure (variable block size), stratified by disease stage (M0 vs M1), previous oesophagectomy or gastrectomy (yes vs no), and previous (neo)adjuvant (radio)chemotherapy (yes vs no). Treatment consisted of 3-week cycles of twice-daily capecitabine 1000 mg/m 2 (on days 1–14) and intravenous cisplatin 80 mg/m 2 (on day 1), with or without weekly cetuximab (400 mg/m 2 initial infusion on day 1 followed by 250 mg/m 2 per week thereafter). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), assessed by a masked independent review committee in the intention-to-treat population. We assessed safety in all patients who received at least one dose of study drug. This study is registered at EudraCT, number 2007-004219-75. Findings Between June 30, 2008, and Dec 15, 2010, we enrolled 904 patients. Median PFS for 455 patients allocated capecitabine-cisplatin plus cetuximab was 4·4 months (95% CI 4·2–5·5) compared with 5·6 months (5·1–5·7) for 449 patients who were allocated to receive capecitabine-cisplatin alone (hazard ratio 1·09, 95% CI 0·92–1·29; p=0·32). 369 (83%) of 446 patients in the chemotherapy plus cetuximab group and 337 (77%) of 436 patients in the chemotherapy group had grade 3–4 adverse events, including grade 3–4 diarrhoea, hypokalaemia, hypomagnesaemia, rash, and hand-foot syndrome. Grade 3–4 neutropenia was more common in controls than in patients who received cetuximab. Incidence of grade 3–4 skin reactions and acne-like rash was substantially higher in the cetuximab-containing regimen than in the control regimen. 239 (54%) of 446 in the cetuximab group and 194 (44%) of 436 in the control group had any grade of serious adverse event. Interpretation Addition of cetuximab to capecitabine-cisplatin provided no additional benefit to chemotherapy alone in the first-line treatment of advanced gastric cancer in our trial. Funding Merck KGaA.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Clinical impact of tumour biology in the management of gastroesophageal cancer

TL;DR: An overview of the key developments in the treatment of gastroesophageal cancer is provided, and potential strategies to further optimize therapy by targeting disease subtypes are discussed.
Journal ArticleDOI

Next-generation clinical trials: Novel strategies to address the challenge of tumor molecular heterogeneity.

TL;DR: Various ‘next‐generation’ biomarker‐driven trial designs and their potentials and limitations to tackle recognized molecular heterogeneity challenges are discussed.
Journal ArticleDOI

Molecular classification of gastric cancer: Towards a pathway-driven targeted therapy.

TL;DR: An overview of the morphological classification, current treatment approaches, and molecular alterations that have been characterized for GC are provided and insights regarding emerging stem cell pathways are described, which may provide additional novel markers for the development of therapeutic agents against GC.
Journal ArticleDOI

Efficacy of Sequential Ipilimumab Monotherapy versus Best Supportive Care for Unresectable Locally Advanced/Metastatic Gastric or Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer.

TL;DR: Although ipilimumab at 10 mg/kg was manageable, it did not improve irPFS versus BSC, however, comparable median OS of approximately 1 year and a favorable safety profile support the investigation of ipILimumab in combination with other therapies for advanced gastric cancer.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008.

TL;DR: The results for 20 world regions are presented, summarizing the global patterns for the eight most common cancers, and striking differences in the patterns of cancer from region to region are observed.
Journal ArticleDOI

New Guidelines to Evaluate the Response to Treatment in Solid Tumors

TL;DR: A model by which a combined assessment of all existing lesions, characterized by target lesions and nontarget lesions, is used to extrapolate an overall response to treatment is proposed, which is largely validated by the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Group and integrated into the present guidelines.
Journal ArticleDOI

Platinum-Based Chemotherapy plus Cetuximab in Head and Neck Cancer

TL;DR: Adding cetuximab to platinum-based chemotherapy with fluorouracil (platinum-fluorouracils) significantly prolonged the median overall survival and improved overall survival when given as first-line treatment in patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck.
Journal ArticleDOI

Capecitabine and oxaliplatin for advanced esophagogastric cancer.

TL;DR: Capecitabine and oxaliplatin are as effective as fluorouracil and cisplatin, respectively, in patients with previously untreated esophagogastric cancer, in a two-by-two design.
Related Papers (5)

Comprehensive molecular characterization of gastric adenocarcinoma

Adam J. Bass, +257 more
- 11 Sep 2014 -