Decadal Variability of the Kuroshio Extension: Observations and an Eddy-Resolving Model Hindcast*
read more
Citations
The Pacific Decadal Oscillation, Revisited
Sea surface temperature variability: Patterns and mechanisms
Air–sea interaction over ocean fronts and eddies
Pacific western boundary currents and their roles in climate
Role of the Gulf Stream and Kuroshio–Oyashio Systems in Large-Scale Atmosphere–Ocean Interaction: A Review
References
The NCEP/NCAR 40-Year Reanalysis Project
Decadal atmosphere-ocean variations in the Pacific
Global high-resolution mapping of ocean circulation from TOPEX/Poseidon and ERS-1 and -2
Causes of Decadal Climate Variability over the North Pacific and North America
Related Papers (5)
Variability of the Kuroshio Extension Jet, Recirculation Gyre, and Mesoscale Eddies on Decadal Time Scales
Kuroshio Extension Variability and Forcing of the Pacific Decadal Oscillations: Responses and Potential Feedback
The NCEP/NCAR 40-Year Reanalysis Project
Frequently Asked Questions (10)
Q2. What is the role of the surface heat flux in the OFES hindcast?
Other than the arrival of the Rossby waves, surface heat flux, if it drives SST anomalies in the KOE region, could contribute to the organization of the frontal-scale variability in the OFES hindcast and its phase locking to the observation by constraining the upper-ocean density gradient.
Q3. What is the effect of the nonlinear interaction of recirculation, PV a?
The nonlinear interaction of recirculation, PV advection, and eddies cause the doublegyre circulation to vacillate between a straight and penetrative inertial jet and a meandering and westward confined one (e.g., McCalpin and Haidvogel 1996).
Q4. How long has the slow westward propagation of baroclinic Rossby waves been exploit?
the slow westward propagation of wind-forced baroclinic Rossby waves has been exploited for skillful prediction of ocean pressure variability in the KOE region with a lead time up to a year (Schneider and Miller 2001).
Q5. What is the broadscale component of the difference field in OFES?
The broadscale component of the difference field in OFES (Fig. 8c, shaded) represents the spinup of both the subtropical and subpolar gyres, in broad agreement with the linear Rossby wave model (Fig. 8d, shaded, pattern correlation coefficient 0.67).
Q6. What is the effect of the damping coefficient on the spatial structure of the linear Rossby wave?
As PC-2 displays a quasi-decadal oscillation (Fig. 4e), 3 Sensitivity experiments show that the spatial structure of the linear Rossby wave model hindcast depends on the damping coefficient [ in Eq. (3)]; the larger the damping, the smoother the meridional structure of the EOFs (not shown).
Q7. What is the role of nonlinear ocean dynamics in the spatial structure of the KE?
Their analysis shows that while the linear Rossby wave theory explains the temporal variability, nonlinear ocean dynamics play an essential role in organizing the spatial structure, thereby reconciling two conflicting schools of thought reviewed above.
Q8. How long does the resultant time series follow?
The resultant time series (blue curve) closely follows the OFES hindcast as well as T/P observations for up to 9 months, including an initial decrease and the subsequent increase in PC-1.
Q9. What is the result of the prediction run?
The authors perform a prediction run, in which the OFES is initialized with the hindcast field on 1 January 2000 and integrated forward under monthly climatological atmospheric forcing.
Q10. What is the epoch average of the KE frontal modes?
The authors construct the epoch averages of SSH for the two periods and their differences, the latter of which are dominated by the first mode since the epoch averages of the PC-2 of the KE frontal modes are nearly zero.