Insights into the Oxygen Vacancy Filling Mechanism in CuO/CeO2 Catalysts: A Key Step Toward High Selectivity in Preferential CO Oxidation
read more
Citations
Adjacent single-atom irons boosting molecular oxygen activation on MnO2.
Structural transformations of solid electrocatalysts and photocatalysts
Highly Efficient CuO/α-MnO2 Catalyst for Low-Temperature CO Oxidation
Multiphase Nanosheet-nanowire Cerium Oxide and Nickel-cobalt Phosphide for Highly-efficient Electrocatalytic Overall Water Splitting
Tiny Species with Big Impact: High Activity of Cu Single Atoms on CeO2-TiO2 Deciphered by Operando Spectroscopy
References
Generalized Gradient Approximation Made Simple
Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set.
Projector augmented-wave method
Efficiency of ab-initio total energy calculations for metals and semiconductors using a plane-wave basis set
Electron-energy-loss spectra and the structural stability of nickel oxide: An LSDA+U study
Related Papers (5)
Frequently Asked Questions (16)
Q2. What was used to keep the pressure constant in the XPS chamber?
A Puregas gas inlet system (SPECS) was used to keep the total pressure in the XPS chamber constant at 1 mbar and to control the gas feed.
Q3. What is the catalytic performance of CuO/CeO2 materials?
The catalytic performance of CuO/CeO2 materials relies on the synergistic metal oxide/support interactions arising from complex redox effects induced between the CuO and CeO2 phases at theinterfacial contact points.
Q4. What is the effect of the change from direct to synergistic reoxidation mechanism?
The change from direct to synergistic reoxidation mechanism (via CeO2) delays Cu particles reoxidation and CO conversion decays at the expense of H2 oxidation.
Q5. What is the role of CO-PROX in the development of onboard and portable technologies?
In particular, CO-PROX brings promising opportunities in the implementation of onboard and portable H2-dependent technologies, where lightness is a requirement.
Q6. What were the different sets of photon energies used for each analysis?
For each analysis, two different sets of photon energies were used, namely 1082 and 1372 eV for the Ce 3d and Cu 2p regions and 972 and 722 eV for the O 1s and C 1s regions.
Q7. What is the contribution of Ce3+ cations to the expansion of ceria?
Another contribution to such expansion is the presence of Ce3+ cations, with larger radii than Ce4+, that balance the charge deficit left upon the formation of oxygen vacancies in ceria induced by temperature.
Q8. How many facets were built to minimize the interaction between periodic slabs?
These slabs were built thick enough to ensure there is minimal interaction between the top and the bottom (3 metal layers for CeO2, 4 for CuO and Cu2O slabs), with a sufficiently large vacuum gap (ca. 15 Å) perpendicular to the surface to minimize the interaction between periodic slabs in that direction.
Q9. At what temperature did the surface of CuO exhibit a reduced state?
At the maximum measured temperature, however, with total XO2 and still maximum XCO, no trace of CuO on the surface was detected and copper particles were found to exhibit Cu0/Cu+ mixed reduced states.
Q10. What is the general characterization of the CuO/CeO2 catalyst?
Altogether the general characterization results indicate that the 5% w/w Cu catalyst prepared by f lash calcination is composed of both finely disperse CuOx particles and bigger CuO bulklike clusters in weaker interaction with the ceria carrier.
Q11. Why is the onset of H2 oxidation delayed?
in the case of the NAP−XPS experiment, the onset for H2 oxidation is much more delayed probably due to the large difference in the total working pressure and measurement conditions, which causes the CO oxidation to remain selective for a wider temperature window.
Q12. What is the effect of CeO2 reduction on the surface of copper?
These results reveal that though CeO2 reduction is detrimental to CO conversion, the improved surface reducibility of copper species plays a positive role.
Q13. How was the equilibrium lattice constant for the Cu and Ce bulk oxides optimized?
51The equilibrium lattice constant for the Cu and Ce bulk oxides was optimized with a Γ-centered k-point grid of 5 × 5 × 5 and 7 × 7 × 7, respectively, and using the Birch−Murnaghanequation of state.
Q14. What is the main factor responsible for the improved performance of the combined catalyst?
These experiments point out the synergistic Cu−Ce interactions at the CuO/CeO2 interface as the main factor responsible for the improved performance of the combined catalyst, as well reported.
Q15. What is the morphology of the heterogeneous CuO/CeO2?
TEM characterization (Figure S5) allowed us to elucidate the particle morphology in the heterogeneous CuO/CeO2 catalyst, which exhibits a polycrystalline nature with irregular sizes and shapes.
Q16. What is the effect of the excess electrons on the surface of the oxide?
The localization of the excess of electrons on the oxide surface has been extensively studied for CeO249,66,92 showing that it can have a considerable effect on the calculated EO‑vac value.