scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

On the Validity of Student Evaluation of Teaching: The State of the Art

TLDR
The authors provided an extensive overview of the recent literature on student evaluation of teaching (SET) in higher education, based on the SET meta-validation model, drawing upon research reports published in peer-reviewed journals since 2000.
Abstract
This article provides an extensive overview of the recent literature on student evaluation of teaching (SET) in higher education. The review is based on the SET meta-validation model, drawing upon research reports published in peer-reviewed journals since 2000. Through the lens of validity, we consider both the more traditional research themes in the field of SET (i.e., the dimensionality debate, the ‘bias’ question, and questionnaire design) and some recent trends in SET research, such as online SET and bias investigations into additional teacher personal characteristics. The review provides a clear idea of the state of the art with regard to research on SET, thus allowing researchers to formulate suggestions for future research. It is argued that SET remains a current yet delicate topic in higher education, as well as in education research. Many stakeholders are not convinced of the usefulness and validity of SET for both formative and summative purposes. Research on SET has thus far failed to provide c...

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Meta-analysis of faculty's teaching effectiveness: Student evaluation of teaching ratings and student learning are not related

TL;DR: This article conducted a meta-analysis of all multisection studies and found no significant correlations between student evaluation of teaching (SET) ratings and learning, and suggested that institutions focused on student learning and career success may want to abandon SET ratings as a measure of faculty's teaching effectiveness.
Journal ArticleDOI

Gender biases in student evaluations of teaching

TL;DR: This article used data from a French university to analyze gender biases in student evaluations of teaching (SETs) and found that male students express a bias in favor of male professors, despite the fact that students appear to learn as much from women as from men.
Journal ArticleDOI

Teaching with technology in higher education: understanding conceptual change and development in practice

TL;DR: This paper found that teachers' conceptions of and approaches to teaching with technology are central for the successful implementation of educational technologies in higher education, and that teachers were concerned with the success of the implementation of higher education.
Journal ArticleDOI

Contract cheating: a survey of Australian university students

TL;DR: This paper reported that Australian universities are facing a significant and growing problem of students outsourcing their assessment to third parties, a behaviour commonly known as ''c...'' behaviour commonly referred to as "c...
Journal ArticleDOI

A Century of Grading Research: Meaning and Value in the Most Common Educational Measure

TL;DR: A review of over 100 years of research on grading considers five types of studies: early studies of the reliability of grades, quantitative studies of composition of K-12 report card grades, survey and interview studies of teachers' perceptions of grade, studies of standards-based grading, and grading in higher education.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Are Student Evaluations of Teaching Effectiveness Valid for Measuring Student Learning Outcomes in Business Related Classes? A Neural Network and Bayesian Analyses

TL;DR: The authors investigated the underlying relational structure between student evaluations of teaching effectiveness (SETEs) and achievement of student learning outcomes in 116 business related courses and found little or no support for the validity of SETEs as a general indicator of teaching efficiency or student learning.
Journal ArticleDOI

Faculty Thoughts and Concerns About Student Ratings

TL;DR: Although student ratings of instruction are used to determine whether a person is teaching effectively, many people who use them are not aware of the extensive research base for them as mentioned in this paper, which is not the case here.
Journal ArticleDOI

The multidimensionality of students' evaluations of teaching effectiveness: The generality of factor structures across academic discipline, instructor level, and course level

TL;DR: In this paper, the same nine factors that the Student Evaluation of Educational Quality (SEEQ) instrument was designed to measure were consistently identified in each of the 22 different factor analyses and all factor structures were remarkably well defined and consistent.
Journal ArticleDOI

Instructors’ perspectives on the utility of student ratings of instruction

TL;DR: This paper investigated instructors' attitudes about student ratings of instruction and found that they consider the student evaluations only marginally valuable in their impact on enhancing instruction, and that the student ratings are useful to administrators in making summative decisions.
Journal ArticleDOI

The Dimensions of Students' Perceptions of Teaching Effectiveness.

TL;DR: In this paper, the use of student ratings of instructional quality is enhanced by an understanding of the nature of the underlying dimensions, and confirmatory factor analysis procedures are used to evaluate student ratings.
Related Papers (5)
Trending Questions (1)
What is the state of the art in the literature about university teaching?

The state of the art in the literature about university teaching is discussed in the paper.