scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

Safety and activity of microRNA-loaded minicells in patients with recurrent malignant pleural mesothelioma: a first-in-man, phase 1, open-label, dose-escalation study

TLDR
This first-in-man, open-label, dose-escalation phase 1 trial at three major cancer centres in Sydney aimed to assess the safety, optimal dosing, and activity of TargomiRs in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma.
Abstract
Summary Background TargomiRs are minicells (EnGeneIC Dream Vectors) loaded with miR-16-based mimic microRNA (miRNA) and targeted to EGFR that are designed to counteract the loss of the miR-15 and miR-16 family miRNAs, which is associated with unsuppressed tumour growth in preclinical models of malignant pleural mesothelioma. We aimed to assess the safety, optimal dosing, and activity of TargomiRs in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma. Methods In this first-in-man, open-label, dose-escalation phase 1 trial at three major cancer centres in Sydney (NSW, Australia), we recruited adults (aged ≥18 years) with a confirmed diagnosis of malignant pleural mesothelioma, measurable disease, radiological signs of progression after previous chemotherapy, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1, life expectancy of 3 months or more, immunohistochemical evidence of tumour EGFR expression, and adequate bone marrow, liver, and renal function. Patients were given TargomiRs via 20 min intravenous infusion either once or twice a week (3 days apart) in a traditional 3 + 3 dose-escalation design in five dose cohorts. The dose-escalation steps planned were 5 × 10 9 , 7 × 10 9 , and 9 × 10 9 TargomiRs either once or twice weekly, but after analysis of data from the first eight patients, all subsequent patients started protocol treatment at 1 × 10 9 TargomiRs. The primary endpoints were to establish the maximum tolerated dose of TargomiRs as measured by dose-limiting toxicity, define the optimal frequency of administration, and objective response (defined as the percentage of assessable patients with a complete or partial response), duration of response (defined as time from the first evidence of response to disease progression in patients who achieved a response), time to response (ie, time from start of treatment to the first evidence of response) and overall survival (defined as time from treatment allocation to death from any cause). Analyses were based on the full analysis set principle, including every patient who received at least one dose of TargomiRs. The study was closed for patient entry on Jan 3, 2017, and registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02369198, and the Australian Registry of Clinical Trials, number ACTRN12614001248651. Findings Between Sept 29, 2014, and Nov 24, 2016, we enrolled 27 patients, 26 of whom received at least one TargomiR dose (one patient died before beginning treatment). Overall, five dose-limiting toxicities were noted: infusion-related inflammatory symptoms and coronary ischaemia, respectively, in two patients given 5 × 10 9 TargomiRs twice weekly; anaphylaxis and cardiomyopathy, respectively, in two patients given 5 × 10 9 TargomiRs once weekly but who received reduced dexamethasone prophylaxis; and non-cardiac pain in one patient who received 5 × 10 9 TargomiRs once weekly. We established that 5 × 10 9 TargomiRs once weekly was the maximum tolerated dose. TargomiR infusions were accompanied by transient lymphopenia (25 [96%] of 26 patients), temporal hypophosphataemia (17 [65%] of 26 patients), increased aspartate aminotransferase or alanine aminotranferase (six [23%] of 26 patients), and increased alkaline phosphatase blood concentrations (two [8%]). Cardiac events occurred in five patients: three patients had electrocardiographic changes, one patient had ischaemia, and one patient had Takotsubo cardiomyopathy. Of the 22 patients who were assessed for response by CT, one (5%) had a partial response, 15 (68%) had stable disease, and six (27%) had progressive disease. The proportion of patients who achieved an objective response was therefore one (5%) of 22, and the duration of the objective response in that patient was 32 weeks. Median overall survival was 200 days (95% CI 94–358). During the trial, 21 deaths occurred, of which 20 were related to tumour progression and one was due to bowel perforation. Interpretation The acceptable safety profile and early signs of activity of TargomiRs in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma support additional studies of TargomiRs in combination with chemotherapy or immune checkpoint inhibitors. Funding Asbestos Diseases Research Foundation.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Nanoparticles in the clinic: An update.

TL;DR: A 3 year update on the current clinical landscape of nanoparticle drug delivery systems and highlight newly approved nanomedicines, provide a status update on previous clinical trials, and highlight new technologies that have recently entered the clinic are provided.
Journal ArticleDOI

The Role of Non-coding RNAs in Oncology

TL;DR: For decades, research into cancer biology focused on the involvement of protein-coding genes, but an explosion of studies into ncRNA biology has shown that they represent a diverse and prevalent group of RNAs, including both oncogenic molecules and those that work in a tumor suppressive manner.

MicroRNAs: Target Recognition and Regulatory Functions

TL;DR: In this article, a review outlines the current understanding of miRNA target recognition in animals and discusses the widespread impact of miRNAs on both the expression and evolution of protein-coding genes.
Journal ArticleDOI

RNA in cancer.

TL;DR: The regulation of gene expression by coding and non-coding RNA is introduced and both established and emerging roles for RNAs in cancer are discussed, highlighting the potential mechanisms by which these RNA subtypes contribute to cancer.
Journal ArticleDOI

Therapeutic siRNA: state of the art.

TL;DR: In this review, the evolution of siRNA chemical modifications and their biomedical performance are comprehensively reviewed and all clinically explored and commercialized siRNA delivery platforms, including the GalNAc–siRNA conjugate, and their fundamental design principles are thoroughly discussed.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

MicroRNAs: Target Recognition and Regulatory Functions

TL;DR: The current understanding of miRNA target recognition in animals is outlined and the widespread impact of miRNAs on both the expression and evolution of protein-coding genes is discussed.
Journal ArticleDOI

Most mammalian mRNAs are conserved targets of microRNAs

TL;DR: This work overhauled its tool for finding preferential conservation of sequence motifs and applied it to the analysis of human 3'UTRs, increasing by nearly threefold the detected number of preferentially conserved miRNA target sites.
Journal ArticleDOI

Diversifying microRNA sequence and function

TL;DR: This work has shown that the production of different isoforms of individual miRNAs in specific cells and tissues may have broader implications for miRNA-mediated gene expression control.
Journal ArticleDOI

The miR-15a-miR-16-1 cluster controls prostate cancer by targeting multiple oncogenic activities.

TL;DR: It is proposed thatmiR-15a and miR-16 act as tumor suppressor genes in prostate cancer through the control of cell survival, proliferation and invasion through the regulation of BCL2 and CCND1.
Related Papers (5)