Super Luminous Ic Supernovae: catching a magnetar by the tail
read more
Citations
A kilonova as the electromagnetic counterpart to a gravitational-wave source
Pulsational Pair-instability Supernovae
Cosmological Constraints from Measurements of Type Ia Supernovae Discovered During the First 1.5 Yr of the Pan-STARRS1 Survey
Six months of multiwavelength follow-up of the tidal disruption candidate asassn-14li and implied tde rates from asas-sn
Slowly fading super-luminous supernovae that are not pair-instability explosions
References
The death of massive stars – I. Observational constraints on the progenitors of Type II-P supernovae
Signatures of pulsars in the light curves of newly formed supernova remnants
Supernova Explosions inside Carbon-Oxygen Circumstellar Shells
Supernova Light Curves Powered by Fallback Accretion
Related Papers (5)
Super-luminous Type Ic Supernovae: Catching a Magnetar by the Tail
Hydrogen-poor superluminous stellar explosions
Frequently Asked Questions (13)
Q2. What is the likely way to make progress?
Theoretical modeling of high-quality data in the nebular phase to determine the ejecta masses, composition and the mass of 56Co contributing to the luminosity seems the most likely way to make progress.
Q3. What is the constraint on the explosion epoch of any SL-SN?
The non-detection of the transient the day before the discovery gives us the best constraint on the explosion epoch of any SL-SN to date, allowing the rise time and light curve shape to be confidently measured.
Q4. What is the flux missed in the NIR?
The flux missed in the NIR by their griz-bolometric measurements typically increases with time, and reaches roughly 50% after ∼60 days post-maximum.
Q5. How long does the g r color increase after peak?
After this early period of constant color, the g − r color increases, reaching another phase of almost constant value at ∼40 days, perhaps indicating a decrease in the cooling rate.
Q6. How did Chen et al. (2013) show that the tail phase faded to levels?
In the case of SN 2010gx, Chen et al. (2013) showed that the tail phase faded to levels which would imply an upper limit of around 0.4 M of 56Ni.
Q7. How long does the color evolution of the sample last?
The r − z colors of the sample show a roughly constant increase from peak to ∼50–60 days, when the color evolution appears to flatten.
Q8. How do the authors fit the light curves of their five objects?
The authors use standard diffusion equations derived by Arnett (1982) and add magnetar powering (as in Kasen & Bildsten 2010) to fit the light curves of their five objects.
Q9. What is the conservative limit on the magnetic energy in the magnetar?
The most conservative limit the authors can set is that the magnetic energy in the magnetar must be less than the gravitational binding energy of the neutron star (Chandrasekhar & Fermi 1953).
Q10. What is the conservative explanation for a small rotational period and a large magnetic field?
An explanation for both a small rotational period and a large magnetic field could be a large-scale helical dynamo that is possible when the rotation period is comparable to the timescale of the convective motions (Duncan & Thompson 1992).
Q11. What was the first search of the local universe without a galaxy bias?
The Texas Supernova Search was a pioneer in this area, with one of the first searches of the local universe without a galaxy bias (Quimby et al. 2005).
Q12. How can the light curves be reproduced?
The light curves cannot be reproduced with a physical model that has an ejecta mass significantly greater than the 56Ni mass needed to power the peak.
Q13. How do the authors get the kinetic energy over the magnetar energy input phase?
The authors use a factor of 1/2 for an approximation of the average kinetic energy over the magnetar energy input phase, which the authors show in Appendix D.4 produces good agreement with more detailed time-dependent calculations of Ek.19