Open Access
The Logic of Biological Classification and the Foundations of Biomedical Ontology
Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
Drawing on Aristotle, a system of axioms and definitions for the treatment of biological classes and instances is developed, which aims to provide a rigorous account of the logic of classification that underlies GO and similar biomedical ontologies.Abstract:
Biomedical research is increasingly a matter of the navigation through large computerized information resources deriving from functional genomics or from the biochemistry of disease pathways. To make such navigation possible, controlled vocabularies are needed in terms of which data from different sources can be unified. One of the most influential developments in this regard is the so-called Gene Ontology, which consists of controlled vocabularies of terms used by biologists to describe cellular constituents, biological processes and molecular functions, organized into hierarchies via the relation of class subsumption. Here we seek to provide a rigorous account of the logic of classification that underlies GO and similar biomedical ontologies. Drawing on Aristotle, we develop a system of axioms and definitions for the treatment of biological classes and instances. Introduction In reflection of the huge amounts of data accumulating in areas such as genomics and proteomics, biology and biomedicine have come to rely increasingly on the use of computational methods in their research. One of the most impressive and influential developments in this regard is the so-called Gene Ontology (GO), which is being developed as part of the effort to produce controlled vocabularies for shared use across different biological domains within the framework of the Open Biological Ontologies project. We take GO as our test case in what follows, not only because it has proved so successful in serving as a common reference system for a variety of groups working at the forefront of biomedical research, but also because, as we shall see, it suffers from a series of problems which are characteristic of almost all current ontologies used in bioinformatics. 1 The Gene Ontology Consortium, “Gene Ontology: Tool for the Unification of Biology. Nature Genetics, 25 (2000), 25-29. See also: http://www.geneontology.org. 2 http://obo.sourceforge.net.read more
Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Invertebrate neurophylogeny: suggested terms and definitions for a neuroanatomical glossary
Stefan Richter,Rudi Loesel,Günter Purschke,Andreas Schmidt-Rhaesa,Gerhard Scholtz,Thomas Stach,Lars Vogt,Andreas Wanninger,Georg Brenneis,Georg Brenneis,Carmen Döring,Simone Faller,Martin Fritsch,Peter Grobe,Carsten Michael Heuer,Sabrina Kaul,Ole Sten Møller,Carsten H. G. Müller,Verena Rieger,Birgen H. Rothe,Martin E.J. Stegner,Steffen Harzsch +21 more
TL;DR: The use of revised neuroanatomical terminology in any new descriptions of the anatomy of invertebrate nervous systems will improve the comparability of this organ system and its substructures between the various taxa, and finally even lead to better and more robust homology hypotheses.
Journal ArticleDOI
A gross anatomy ontology for hymenoptera.
TL;DR: The Hymenoptera Anatomy Ontology provides a foundation through which connections between genomic, evolutionary developmental biology, phylogenetic, taxonomic, and morphological research can be actualized and is available through the OBO Foundry ontology repository and BioPortal.
Journal ArticleDOI
An open annotation ontology for science on web 3.0
TL;DR: The Annotation Ontology meets critical requirements for an open, freely shareable model in OWL, of annotation metadata created against scientific documents on the Web, and will enable biomedical domain ontologies to be used quite widely to annotate the scientific literature.
Journal ArticleDOI
Worm Phenotype Ontology: Integrating phenotype data within and beyond the C. elegans community
TL;DR: A standardized phenotype ontology that will help to facilitate data retrieval, and cross-species comparisons within the nematode community, and will permit data integration, and interoperability across the different Model Organism Databases (MODs) and other biological databases.
Journal ArticleDOI
Data integration in biological research: an overview
Vasileios Lapatas,Michalis Stefanidakis,Rafael C. Jimenez,Allegra Via,Maria Victoria Schneider +4 more
TL;DR: In this article, the authors provide a background on what is data integration from a computational science point of view, how it has been applied to biological research, which key aspects contributed to its success and future directions.
References
More filters
Proceedings Article
Some Ontological Principles for Designing Upper Level Lexical Resources
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors explore some semantic problems related to the use of linguistic ontologies in information systems, and suggest some organizing principles aimed to solve such problems, focusing on the problem of ISA overloading.
Journal ArticleDOI
Do Mountains Exist? Towards an Ontology of Landforms:
Barry Smith,David M. Mark +1 more
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors begin with the question "Do mountains exist?" and show that providing an answer to this question is surprisingly difficult and that the answer that one gives depends on the context in which the question is posed.
A Reference Ontology for Bioinformatics: The Foundational Model of Anatomy
TL;DR: The Foundational Model of Anatomy is proposed as a reference ontology in biomedical informatics for correlating different views of anatomy, aligning existing and emerging ontologies in bioinformatics and providing a structure-based template for representing biological functions.
Proceedings Article
The ontology of the gene ontology.
TL;DR: The results of applying certain organizing principles drawn from philosophical ontology to GO are explored with a view to improving GO's consistency and coherence and thus its future applicability in the automated processing of biological data.
Proceedings Article
A Theory of Granular Partitions
Thomas Bittner,Barry Smith +1 more
TL;DR: The theory of granular partitions as it is developed in this paper is intended to serve as an alternative to set theory both as a tool of formal ontology and as a framework for the representation of human cognition.
Related Papers (5)
The OBO Foundry : coordinated evolution of ontologies to support biomedical data integration
Barry Smith,Michael Ashburner,Cornelius Rosse,Jonathan Bard,William J. Bug,Werner Ceusters,Louis J. Goldberg,Karen Eilbeck,Amelia Ireland,Christopher J. Mungall,Neocles B. Leontis,Philippe Rocca-Serra,Alan Ruttenberg,Susanna-Assunta Sansone,Richard H. Scheuermann,Nigam H. Shah,Patricia L. Whetzel,Suzanna E. Lewis +17 more
Ontologies in biology: design, applications and future challenges.
Jonathan Bard,Seung Y. Rhee +1 more
The linguistic problem of morphology: structure versus homology and the standardization of morphological data
Gene Ontology: tool for the unification of biology
M Ashburner,Catherine A. Ball,Judith A. Blake,David Botstein,Heather Butler,J. M. Cherry,Allan Peter Davis,Kara Dolinski,Selina S. Dwight,J.T. Eppig,Midori A. Harris,David P. Hill,Laurie Issel-Tarver,Andrew Kasarskis,Suzanna E. Lewis,John C. Matese,Joel E. Richardson,M. Ringwald,Gerald M. Rubin,Gavin Sherlock +19 more