What Information Should Be Required to Support Clinical “Omics” Publications?
Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
Transparently available data and code would have made checking results and their validity far easier, and an understanding of the problems was delayed, trials were started on the basis of faulty data and conclusions, and patients were endangered.Abstract:
A major goal of “omics” is personalizing therapy—the use of “signatures” derived from biological assays to determine who gets what treatment. Recently, Potti et al. (1) introduced a method that uses microarray profiles to better predict the cytotoxic agents to which a patient would respond. The method was extended to include other drugs, as well as combination chemotherapy (2, 3). We were asked if we could implement this approach to guide treatment at our institution; however, when we tried to reproduce the published results, we found that poor documentation hid many simple errors that undermined the approach (4). These signatures were nonetheless used to guide patient therapy in clinical trails initiated at Duke University in 2007, which we learned about in mid-2009. We then published a report that detailed numerous problems with the data (5). As chronicled in The Cancer Letter , trials were suspended (October 2, 9, and 23, 2009), restarted (January 29, 2010), resuspended (July 23, 2010), and finally terminated (November 19, 2010). The underlying reports have now been retracted; further investigations at Duke are under way. We spent approximately 1500 person-hours on this issue, mostly because we could not tell what data were used or how they were processed. Transparently available data and code would have made checking results and their validity far easier. Because transparency was absent, an understanding of the problems was delayed, trials were started on the basis of faulty data and conclusions, and patients were endangered. Such situations need to be avoided.
We wrote to Nature (6) to identify the 5 things that should be supplied: ( a ) the raw data; ( b ) the code used to derive the results from the raw data; ( c ) evidence of the provenance of the raw data so that labels could be checked; ( d ) written descriptions of any …read more
Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Predicting outcomes in radiation oncology--multifactorial decision support systems
Philippe Lambin,Ruud G.P.M. van Stiphout,Maud H.W. Starmans,Emmanuel Rios-Velazquez,Georgi Nalbantov,Hugo J.W.L. Aerts,Erik Roelofs,Wouter van Elmpt,Paul C. Boutros,Pierluigi Granone,Vincenzo Valentini,Adrian C. Begg,Dirk De Ruysscher,Andre Dekker +13 more
TL;DR: An overview of the factors that are correlated with outcome—including survival, recurrence patterns and toxicity—in radiation oncology is provided and the methodology behind the development of prediction models is discussed, which is a multistage process.
Journal ArticleDOI
Reuse of public genome-wide gene expression data
Johan Rung,Alvis Brazma +1 more
TL;DR: The utility of the gene expression data that are in the public domain and how researchers are making use of these data are discussed and recommendations are provided that can improve the utility of such data.
Book
Evolution of Translational Omics: Lessons Learned and the Path Forward
TL;DR: Challenges in transforming the great promise of new technologies into clinical laboratory tests that can help patients directly has happened more slowly than anticipated, and these challenges converged during a recent case involving premature use of omics-based tests in clinical trials at Duke University.
Statistical Issues in Assessing Hospital Performance
Arlene S. Ash,Stephen F. Fienberg,Thomas A. Louis,Sharon-Lise T. Normand,Therese A. Stukel,Jessica Utts +5 more
TL;DR: Current research focuses on calculating payments that provide patient-centered medical homes with global budgets tailored to the health of their patient panels and methods for assessing the extent to which practices perform better-than-expected with respect to various metrics.
Journal ArticleDOI
Reproducible Research: Addressing the Need for Data and Code Sharing in Computational Science
TL;DR: Roundtable participants identified ways of making computational research details readily available, which is a crucial step in addressing the current credibility crisis.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Minimum information about a microarray experiment (MIAME)-toward standards for microarray data.
Alvis Brazma,Pascal Hingamp,John Quackenbush,Gavin Sherlock,Paul T. Spellman,Chris Stoeckert,John Aach,Wilhelm Ansorge,Catherine A. Ball,Helen C. Causton,Terry Gaasterland,Patrick Glenisson,Frank C. P. Holstege,Irene F. Kim,Victor Markowitz,John C. Matese,Helen Parkinson,Alan J. Robinson,Ugis Sarkans,Steffen Schulze-Kremer,Jason E. Stewart,Ronald C. Taylor,Jaak Vilo,Martin Vingron +23 more
TL;DR: The ultimate goal of this work is to establish a standard for recording and reporting microarray-based gene expression data, which will in turn facilitate the establishment of databases and public repositories and enable the development of data analysis tools.
Journal ArticleDOI
Galaxy: a comprehensive approach for supporting accessible, reproducible, and transparent computational research in the life sciences
TL;DR: Galaxy Pages are interactive, web-based documents that provide users with a medium to communicate a complete computational analysis and provide support for capturing the context and intent of computational methods.
Journal ArticleDOI
Reporting Recommendations for Tumor Marker Prognostic Studies (REMARK)
TL;DR: In this article, the authors present guidelines for the reporting of tumor marker studies, which encourage transparent and complete reporting so that the relevant information will be available to others to help them to judge the usefulness of the data and understand the context in which the conclusions apply.
Journal Article
Reporting recommendations for tumor marker prognostic studies (remark).
TL;DR: These guidelines are designed to encourage transparent and complete reporting of tumor marker studies so that the relevant information will be available to others to help them to judge the usefulness of the data and understand the context in which the conclusions apply.
Journal ArticleDOI
A genomic strategy to refine prognosis in early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer.
Anil Potti,Sayan Mukherjee,Rebecca P. Petersen,Holly K. Dressman,Andrea Bild,Jason I. Koontz,Robert A. Kratzke,Mark A. Watson,Michael J. Kelley,Geoffrey S. Ginsburg,Mike West,David H. Harpole,Joseph R. Nevins +12 more
TL;DR: The lung metagene model provides a potential mechanism to refine the estimation of a patient's risk of disease recurrence and, in principle, to alter decisions regarding the use of adjuvant chemotherapy in early-stage NSCLC.
Related Papers (5)
Bioconductor: open software development for computational biology and bioinformatics
Robert Gentleman,Vincent J. Carey,Douglas M. Bates,Benjamin M. Bolstad,Marcel Dettling,Sandrine Dudoit,Byron Ellis,Laurent Gautier,Yongchao Ge,Jeff Gentry,Kurt Hornik,Torsten Hothorn,Wolfgang Huber,Stefano Maria Iacus,Rafael A. Irizarry,Friedrich Leisch,Cheng Li,Martin Maechler,A. J. Rossini,Günther Sawitzki,Colin A. Smith,Gordon K. Smyth,Luke Tierney,Jean Yang,Jianhua Zhang +24 more
Minimum information about a microarray experiment (MIAME)-toward standards for microarray data.
Alvis Brazma,Pascal Hingamp,John Quackenbush,Gavin Sherlock,Paul T. Spellman,Chris Stoeckert,John Aach,Wilhelm Ansorge,Catherine A. Ball,Helen C. Causton,Terry Gaasterland,Patrick Glenisson,Frank C. P. Holstege,Irene F. Kim,Victor Markowitz,John C. Matese,Helen Parkinson,Alan J. Robinson,Ugis Sarkans,Steffen Schulze-Kremer,Jason E. Stewart,Ronald C. Taylor,Jaak Vilo,Martin Vingron +23 more