Robyn K. Mallett

TL;DR: The authors compared variation in the replicability of 13 classic and contemporary effects across 36 independent samples totaling 6,344 participants and found that the results of these experiments are more dependent on the effect itself than on the sample and setting used to investigate the effect.

TL;DR: This paper conducted preregistered replications of 28 classic and contemporary published findings, with protocols that were peer reviewed in advance, to examine variation in effect magnitudes across samples and settings, and found that very little heterogeneity was attributable to the order in which the tasks were performed or whether the task were administered in lab versus online.

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors examined the association between Modern Sexist beliefs and identifying and engaging in subtle sexist behavior and found that those who endorsed modern sexist beliefs were less likely to detect the occurrence of normative sexist behavior, and this oversight was a function of their failure to define such behavior as sexist.

TL;DR: The authors found that intergroup interactions were more positive than people expected them to be, and one reason for this intergroup forecasting error is that people focus on their dissimilarities with outgroup members.

TL;DR: The authors examined majority group members' collective action on behalf of a minority group, focusing on the role of outgroup perspective taking and group-based guilt, and found that the association between perspective-taking and collective action was partially mediated by groupbased guilt.