Natalia Frankowska

TL;DR: The authors compared variation in the replicability of 13 classic and contemporary effects across 36 independent samples totaling 6,344 participants and found that the results of these experiments are more dependent on the effect itself than on the sample and setting used to investigate the effect.

TL;DR: This paper conducted preregistered replications of 28 classic and contemporary published findings, with protocols that were peer reviewed in advance, to examine variation in effect magnitudes across samples and settings, and found that very little heterogeneity was attributable to the order in which the tasks were performed or whether the task were administered in lab versus online.

TL;DR: The authors encourage researchers to get into the habit of including multiple versions of the content (e.g., stimuli or vignettes) in their designs, to increase confidence in cross-stimulus generalization and to yield more realistic estimates of effect size.

TL;DR: The meta-analytic results for those 23 direct replications of this study tested whether performance on a 30-item general-knowledge trivia task differed between these two priming conditions and observed no overall difference in trivia performance between participants primed with the “professor” category and those primed with a category associated with a lack of intelligence.

TL;DR: The authors used supervised machine learning to identify social and non-social factors that relate to core body temperature and found that complex social integration (CSI), defined as the number of high-contact roles one engages in, is a critical predictor of core temperature.