Loma Linda University

About: Loma Linda University is a education organization based out in Loma Linda, California, United States. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Medicine. The organization has 9220 authors who have published 13485 publications receiving 447094 citations. The organization is also known as: University of Loma Linda.

Effect of aging on stem cells.

Abstract: Pluripotent stem cells have the remarkable self-renewal ability and are capable of differentiating into multiple diverse cells. There is increasing evidence that the aging process can have adverse effects on stem cells. As stem cells age, their renewal ability deteriorates and their ability to differentiate into the various cell types is altered. Accordingly, it is suggested aging-induced deterioration of stem cell functions may play a key role in the pathophysiology of the various aging-associated disorders. Understanding the role of the aging process in deterioration of stem cell function is crucial, not only in understanding the pathophysiology of aging-associated disorders, but also in future development of novel effective stem cell-based therapies to treat aging-associated diseases. This review article first focuses on the basis of the various aging disease-related stem cell dysfunction. It then addresses the several concepts on the potential mechanism that causes aging-related stem cell dysfunction. It also briefly discusses the current potential therapies under development for aging-associated stem cell defects.

Modulation of insulin-like growth factor actions in L6A1 myoblasts by insulin-like growth factor binding protein (IGFBP)-4 and IGFBP-5: a dual role for IGFBP-5

Abstract: We have previously shown that the insulin-like growth factors (IGFs) stimulate both proliferation and differentiation of skeletal muscle cells in culture, and that these actions in L6A1 muscle cells may be modulated by three secreted IGF binding proteins (IGFBPs), IGFBP-4, -5, and -6. Since we found that the temporal expression pattern of IGFBP-4 and IGFBP-5 differed dramatically during the transition from proliferating myoblasts to differentiated myotubes, we undertook the current study to examine the effects of purified IGFBP-4 and IGFBP-5 on IGF-stimulated actions in L6A1 muscle cells. As has been shown for other cell types, we found that IGFBP-4 had only inhibitory actions, inhibiting IGF-I and IGF-II-stimulated proliferation and differentiation. In contrast, IGFBP-5 exhibited both inhibitory and stimulatory actions. When added in the presence of 30 ng/ml IGF-I, IGFBP-5 (250 ng/ml) inhibited all markers of the early proliferative response: the tyrosine phosphorylation of the cytoplasmic signaling molecules IRS-1 and Shc, the activation of the MAP kinases, ERK1 and 2, the elevation of c-fos mRNA, the early inhibition of the elevation in myogenin mRNA, and the increase in cell number. In contrast, IGFBP-5 stimulated all aspects of the myogenic response to IGF-I: the later rise in myogenin mRNA, the elevation of creatine kinase activity, and the fusion of myoblasts into myotubes. This dual response to IGFBP-5 was greatest when it was added at a molar ratio of IGFBP-5 to IGF-I of 2:1. In contrast, when IGFBP-5 was added in the presence of IGF-II, it inhibited both proliferation and differentiation. Neither IGFBP had any effect when added in the presence of R3 IGF-I, an analog with substantially reduced affinity for IGFBPs. Our results suggest that the role of IGFBP-4 is mainly to sequester excess IGFs, and thus inhibit all actions. IGFBP-5, however, is capable of eliciting a dual response, possibly due to its unique ability to associate with the cell membrane.

Not All Soy Products Are Created Equal: Caution Needed in Interpretation of Research Results

Abstract: Interest in the health benefits of soy foods has been intense among the research community, health professionals, and the public. At the same time, potential concerns associated with soy consumption, especially as related to soy isoflavones, have tempered the enthusiasm for making public health recommendations. On both accounts, the primary soybean isoflavone, genistein, has received the most attention. Because consumers are becoming increasingly confused by the often conflicting dietary messages, a balanced and accurate view of the risks and benefits of soy foods and soy food components is essential. Even among health professionals, confusion exists about proper nomenclature and about the precise composition of the agents under investigation. Levels of isoflavones are frequently assumed to be constant within categories of soy foods, and intakes are estimated rather than being directly analyzed. Furthermore, all too often research dealing singularly with genistein is interpreted by both health professionals and the media as equating directly with soy. Researchers often fail to fully understand the implications of their research outcomes and the context in which those outcomes should be placed. With the hundreds of publications yearly on soy and isoflavones, it is especially important to consider the literature in its entirety when making pronouncements about health effects. Efforts are needed by all to reduce the public confusion by adapting standardized approaches to the reporting of data. This paper provides a framework for both standardization of nomenclature and appropriate interpretation of data.