scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

National Institutes of Health

GovernmentBethesda, Maryland, United States
About: National Institutes of Health is a government organization based out in Bethesda, Maryland, United States. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Gene. The organization has 149298 authors who have published 297896 publications receiving 21337431 citations. The organization is also known as: NIH & U.S. National Institutes of Health.
Topics: Population, Gene, Cancer, Receptor, Immune system


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Theo Vos1, Ryan M Barber1, Brad Bell1, Amelia Bertozzi-Villa1  +686 moreInstitutions (287)
TL;DR: In the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013 (GBD 2013) as mentioned in this paper, the authors estimated the quantities for acute and chronic diseases and injuries for 188 countries between 1990 and 2013.

4,510 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: A new software tool called Primer-BLAST is presented to alleviate the difficulty in designing target-specific primers and combines BLAST with a global alignment algorithm to ensure a full primer-target alignment and is sensitive enough to detect targets that have a significant number of mismatches to primers.
Abstract: Choosing appropriate primers is probably the single most important factor affecting the polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Specific amplification of the intended target requires that primers do not have matches to other targets in certain orientations and within certain distances that allow undesired amplification. The process of designing specific primers typically involves two stages. First, the primers flanking regions of interest are generated either manually or using software tools; then they are searched against an appropriate nucleotide sequence database using tools such as BLAST to examine the potential targets. However, the latter is not an easy process as one needs to examine many details between primers and targets, such as the number and the positions of matched bases, the primer orientations and distance between forward and reverse primers. The complexity of such analysis usually makes this a time-consuming and very difficult task for users, especially when the primers have a large number of hits. Furthermore, although the BLAST program has been widely used for primer target detection, it is in fact not an ideal tool for this purpose as BLAST is a local alignment algorithm and does not necessarily return complete match information over the entire primer range. We present a new software tool called Primer-BLAST to alleviate the difficulty in designing target-specific primers. This tool combines BLAST with a global alignment algorithm to ensure a full primer-target alignment and is sensitive enough to detect targets that have a significant number of mismatches to primers. Primer-BLAST allows users to design new target-specific primers in one step as well as to check the specificity of pre-existing primers. Primer-BLAST also supports placing primers based on exon/intron locations and excluding single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) sites in primers. We describe a robust and fully implemented general purpose primer design tool that designs target-specific PCR primers. Primer-BLAST offers flexible options to adjust the specificity threshold and other primer properties. This tool is publicly available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/tools/primer-blast .

4,433 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: A model for the organization of this system that emphasizes a distinction between the representation of invariant and changeable aspects of faces is proposed and is hierarchical insofar as it is divided into a core system and an extended system.

4,430 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Michael S. Lawrence1, Petar Stojanov1, Petar Stojanov2, Paz Polak1, Paz Polak2, Paz Polak3, Gregory V. Kryukov1, Gregory V. Kryukov2, Gregory V. Kryukov3, Kristian Cibulskis1, Andrey Sivachenko1, Scott L. Carter1, Chip Stewart1, Craig H. Mermel1, Craig H. Mermel2, Steven A. Roberts4, Adam Kiezun1, Peter S. Hammerman1, Peter S. Hammerman2, Aaron McKenna5, Aaron McKenna1, Yotam Drier, Lihua Zou1, Alex H. Ramos1, Trevor J. Pugh2, Trevor J. Pugh1, Nicolas Stransky1, Elena Helman6, Elena Helman1, Jaegil Kim1, Carrie Sougnez1, Lauren Ambrogio1, Elizabeth Nickerson1, Erica Shefler1, Maria L. Cortes1, Daniel Auclair1, Gordon Saksena1, Douglas Voet1, Michael S. Noble1, Daniel DiCara1, Pei Lin1, Lee Lichtenstein1, David I. Heiman1, Timothy Fennell1, Marcin Imielinski2, Marcin Imielinski1, Bryan Hernandez1, Eran Hodis2, Eran Hodis1, Sylvan C. Baca1, Sylvan C. Baca2, Austin M. Dulak2, Austin M. Dulak1, Jens G. Lohr1, Jens G. Lohr2, Dan A. Landau2, Dan A. Landau7, Dan A. Landau1, Catherine J. Wu2, Jorge Melendez-Zajgla, Alfredo Hidalgo-Miranda, Amnon Koren2, Amnon Koren1, Steven A. McCarroll1, Steven A. McCarroll2, Jaume Mora8, Ryan S. Lee9, Ryan S. Lee2, Brian D. Crompton9, Brian D. Crompton2, Robert C. Onofrio1, Melissa Parkin1, Wendy Winckler1, Kristin G. Ardlie1, Stacey Gabriel1, Charles W. M. Roberts9, Charles W. M. Roberts2, Jaclyn A. Biegel10, Kimberly Stegmaier1, Kimberly Stegmaier2, Kimberly Stegmaier9, Adam J. Bass2, Adam J. Bass1, Levi A. Garraway2, Levi A. Garraway1, Matthew Meyerson2, Matthew Meyerson1, Todd R. Golub, Dmitry A. Gordenin4, Shamil R. Sunyaev3, Shamil R. Sunyaev1, Shamil R. Sunyaev2, Eric S. Lander1, Eric S. Lander6, Eric S. Lander2, Gad Getz1, Gad Getz2 
11 Jul 2013-Nature
TL;DR: A fundamental problem with cancer genome studies is described: as the sample size increases, the list of putatively significant genes produced by current analytical methods burgeons into the hundreds and the list includes many implausible genes, suggesting extensive false-positive findings that overshadow true driver events.
Abstract: Major international projects are underway that are aimed at creating a comprehensive catalogue of all the genes responsible for the initiation and progression of cancer. These studies involve the sequencing of matched tumour-normal samples followed by mathematical analysis to identify those genes in which mutations occur more frequently than expected by random chance. Here we describe a fundamental problem with cancer genome studies: as the sample size increases, the list of putatively significant genes produced by current analytical methods burgeons into the hundreds. The list includes many implausible genes (such as those encoding olfactory receptors and the muscle protein titin), suggesting extensive false-positive findings that overshadow true driver events. We show that this problem stems largely from mutational heterogeneity and provide a novel analytical methodology, MutSigCV, for resolving the problem. We apply MutSigCV to exome sequences from 3,083 tumour-normal pairs and discover extraordinary variation in mutation frequency and spectrum within cancer types, which sheds light on mutational processes and disease aetiology, and in mutation frequency across the genome, which is strongly correlated with DNA replication timing and also with transcriptional activity. By incorporating mutational heterogeneity into the analyses, MutSigCV is able to eliminate most of the apparent artefactual findings and enable the identification of genes truly associated with cancer.

4,411 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The DBP results suggest that for the large majority of individuals, whether conventionally "hypertensive" or "normotensive", a lower blood pressure should eventually confer a lower risk of vascular disease.

4,397 citations


Authors

Showing all 149386 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
Walter C. Willett3342399413322
Eric S. Lander301826525976
Robert Langer2812324326306
Meir J. Stampfer2771414283776
JoAnn E. Manson2701819258509
Albert Hofman2672530321405
Frank B. Hu2501675253464
Paul M. Ridker2331242245097
Solomon H. Snyder2321222200444
Salim Yusuf2311439252912
Eugene Braunwald2301711264576
Ralph B. D'Agostino2261287229636
John Q. Trojanowski2261467213948
Steven A. Rosenberg2181204199262
Yi Chen2174342293080
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
79.2K papers, 4.7M citations

98% related

University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
75.2K papers, 4.4M citations

98% related

University of California, San Francisco
186.2K papers, 12M citations

98% related

Baylor College of Medicine
94.8K papers, 5M citations

97% related

Emory University
122.4K papers, 6M citations

96% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
202347
2022298
202112,291
202012,261
201911,464
201810,991