Institution
National Institutes of Health
Government•Bethesda, Maryland, United States•
About: National Institutes of Health is a government organization based out in Bethesda, Maryland, United States. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Gene. The organization has 149298 authors who have published 297896 publications receiving 21337431 citations. The organization is also known as: NIH & U.S. National Institutes of Health.
Topics: Population, Gene, Cancer, Receptor, Immune system
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
••
TL;DR: Various approaches to combating multidrug-resistant cancer are described, including the development of drugs that engage, evade or exploit efflux by ABC transporters.
Abstract: Effective treatment of metastatic cancers usually requires the use of toxic chemotherapy. In most cases, multiple drugs are used, as resistance to single agents occurs almost universally. For this reason, elucidation of mechanisms that confer simultaneous resistance to different drugs with different targets and chemical structures - multidrug resistance - has been a major goal of cancer biologists during the past 35 years. Here, we review the most common of these mechanisms, one that relies on drug efflux from cancer cells mediated by ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters. We describe various approaches to combating multidrug-resistant cancer, including the development of drugs that engage, evade or exploit efflux by ABC transporters.
3,147 citations
••
TL;DR: A bioinformatics tool was developed and used to identify proteomic patterns in serum that distinguish neoplastic from non-neoplastic disease within the ovary, justifying a prospective population-based assessment of proteomic pattern technology as a screening tool for all stages of ovarian cancer in high-risk and general populations.
3,144 citations
••
TL;DR: Results indicate that miRNA expression profiles are diagnostic and prognostic markers of lung cancer.
3,135 citations
••
Auckland University of Technology1, Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation2, National Institutes of Health3, Clinical Trial Service Unit4, Columbia University Medical Center5, University of Miami6, Washington State Institute for Public Policy7, Copenhagen University Hospital8, National University of Ireland, Galway9, National University of Singapore10, University of Auckland11, Capital Medical University12, Imperial College London13
TL;DR: Regional and country-specific estimates of stroke incidence, prevalence, mortality, and disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) lost by age group and country income level are calculated, to improve understanding of stroke determinants and burden worldwide.
3,127 citations
••
TL;DR: The 2001 Bethesda System terminology reflects important advances in biological understanding of cervical neoplasia and cervical screening technology.
Abstract: ObjectivesThe Bethesda 2001 Workshop was convened to evaluate and update the 1991
Bethesda System terminology for reporting the results of cervical cytology.
A primary objective was to develop a new approach to broaden participation
in the consensus process.ParticipantsForum groups composed of 6 to 10 individuals were responsible for developing
recommendations for discussion at the workshop. Each forum group included
at least 1 cytopathologist, cytotechnologist, clinician, and international
representative to ensure a broad range of views and interests. More than 400
cytopathologists, cytotechnologists, histopathologists, family practitioners,
gynecologists, public health physicians, epidemiologists, patient advocates,
and attorneys participated in the workshop, which was convened by the National
Cancer Institute and cosponsored by 44 professional societies. More than 20
countries were represented.EvidenceLiterature review, expert opinion, and input from an Internet bulletin
board were all considered in developing recommendations. The strength of evidence
of the scientific data was considered of paramount importance.Consensus ProcessBethesda 2001 was a year-long iterative review process. An Internet
bulletin board was used for discussion of issues and drafts of recommendations.
More than 1000 comments were posted to the bulletin board over the course
of 6 months. The Bethesda Workshop, held April 30-May 2, 2001, was open to
the public. Postworkshop recommendations were posted on the bulletin board
for a last round of critical review prior to finalizing the terminology.ConclusionsBethesda 2001 was developed with broad participation in the consensus
process. The 2001 Bethesda System terminology reflects important advances
in biological understanding of cervical neoplasia and cervical screening technology.
3,122 citations
Authors
Showing all 149386 results
Name | H-index | Papers | Citations |
---|---|---|---|
Walter C. Willett | 334 | 2399 | 413322 |
Eric S. Lander | 301 | 826 | 525976 |
Robert Langer | 281 | 2324 | 326306 |
Meir J. Stampfer | 277 | 1414 | 283776 |
JoAnn E. Manson | 270 | 1819 | 258509 |
Albert Hofman | 267 | 2530 | 321405 |
Frank B. Hu | 250 | 1675 | 253464 |
Paul M. Ridker | 233 | 1242 | 245097 |
Solomon H. Snyder | 232 | 1222 | 200444 |
Salim Yusuf | 231 | 1439 | 252912 |
Eugene Braunwald | 230 | 1711 | 264576 |
Ralph B. D'Agostino | 226 | 1287 | 229636 |
John Q. Trojanowski | 226 | 1467 | 213948 |
Steven A. Rosenberg | 218 | 1204 | 199262 |
Yi Chen | 217 | 4342 | 293080 |