Institution
St Thomas' Hospital
Healthcare•London, United Kingdom•
About: St Thomas' Hospital is a healthcare organization based out in London, United Kingdom. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Pregnancy. The organization has 12105 authors who have published 15596 publications receiving 624309 citations. The organization is also known as: St Thomas's Hospital & St. Thomas's.
Topics: Population, Pregnancy, Antiphospholipid syndrome, Medicine, Cancer
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
••
TL;DR: Between May 1, 1976, and May 14, 1977, 343 of 1056 5-day-old babies in newborn nurseries excreted rotaviruses, and infection appeared in the new wards, including those admitting only new patients, within a short period.
184 citations
••
TL;DR: These interim results show that this schedule of oral etoposide is inferior to intravenous chemotherapy in the treatment of advanced SCLC and should not be used as first-line treatment of this disease.
Abstract: Background: Oral etoposide is an active single agent in small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) and is widely prescribed as first-line treatment as an alternative to intravenous combination chemotherapy in patients with extensive disease. Purpose: The intention of this study was to determine if the effects of oral etoposide therapy on survival and quality of life are equivalent to those of intravenous chemotherapy. Methods: In a randomized trial of palliative treatment in advanced SCLC, oral etoposide (100 mg given twice daily for 5 days) was compared with intravenous chemotherapy consisting of alternating cycles of cisplatin and etoposide (PE) and cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and vincristine (CAV). Six cycles of chemotherapy were administered every 21 days in both regimens. Symptom control and quality of life were measured with the Rotterdam Symptom Checklist and a daily diary card. In January 1996, after 155 patients had been randomly assigned from a projected intake of 365 patients, an independent Data Monitoring Committee examined the interim results. Survival was determined by the Kaplan-Meier method, and the logrank test was used to compare treatments. For quality-of-life comparisons, average scores were calculated for each time point. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to determine any significant overall differences between treatments. For the Rotterdam Symptom Checklist, separate analyses were done for each subset (psychological well-being, physical symptoms, lung cancer symptoms, treatment symptoms, activity, and quality of life). Response rates and toxicity scores were compared by using X 2 . All statistical tests were two-sided. Results: Survival was inferior at 1 year in the oral etoposide group compared with intravenous therapy (9.8% for oral versus 19.3% for intravenous; difference = 9.5%; 95% confidence interval of difference = 0.3%-18.7%; P<.05), and there was a trend toward inferior overall survival. Median survival was 4.8 months for oral treatment and 5.9 months for intravenous therapy. Progression-free survival was worse in the oral etoposide arm (median = 3.6 months versus 5.6 months; P<.001), as well as overall response rate (32.9% versus 46.3%; P<.01). With the exception of acute nausea and vomiting associated with intravenous chemotherapy, all aspects of symptom control and quality of life were either the same or worse in the oral etoposide group. Study closure was recommended. Conclusions: These interim results show that this schedule of oral etoposide is inferior to intravenous chemotherapy in the treatment of advanced SCLC and should not be used as first-line treatment of this disease.
184 citations
••
TL;DR: Quantitative methods to perform PET in standardized ways have also been developed which may further improve response assessment including a quantitative extension to the DC (qPET), which may have advantages in providing a continuous scale to refine the threshold for adequate/inadequate response in specific clinical situations or treatment optimization in trials.
Abstract: PET using 18F-FDG for treatment monitoring in patients with lymphoma is one of the most well-developed clinical applications. PET/CT is nowadays used during treatment to assess chemosensitivity, with response-adapted therapy given according to ‘interim’ PET in clinical practice to adults and children with Hodgkin lymphoma. PET is also used to assess remission from disease and to predict prognosis in the pretransplant setting. Mature data have been reported for the common subtypes of aggressive B-cell lymphomas, with more recent data also supporting the use of PET for response assessment in T-cell lymphomas. The Deauville five-point scale incorporating the Deauville criteria (DC) is recommended for response assessment in international guidelines. FDG uptake is graded in relation to the reference regions of normal mediastinum and liver. The DC have been validated in most lymphoma subtypes. The DC permit the threshold for adequate or inadequate response to be adapted according to the clinical context or research question. It is important for PET readers to understand how the DC have been applied in response-adapted trials for correct interpretation and discussion with the multidisciplinary team. Quantitative methods to perform PET in standardized ways have also been developed which may further improve response assessment including a quantitative extension to the DC (qPET). This may have advantages in providing a continuous scale to refine the threshold for adequate/inadequate response in specific clinical situations or treatment optimization in trials. qPET is also less observer-dependent and limits the problem of optical misinterpretation due to the influence of background activity.
184 citations
••
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center1, Leiden University2, Ruhr University Bochum3, University of Hamburg4, St Thomas' Hospital5, Houston Methodist Hospital6, University of Alabama at Birmingham7, Technische Universität München8, University of Bern9, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston10, NewYork–Presbyterian Hospital11, Université de Montréal12, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre13, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust14, Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust15, University of Zurich16, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón17, Valve Corporation18, Brigham and Women's Hospital19
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors evaluated the outcomes of transcatheter mitral valve replacement in patients with failed mitral bioprosthetic valves (ViV) and annuloplasty rings (valve-in-ring [ViR]).
183 citations
••
183 citations
Authors
Showing all 12132 results
Name | H-index | Papers | Citations |
---|---|---|---|
David J. Hunter | 213 | 1836 | 207050 |
Rory Collins | 162 | 489 | 193407 |
Steven Williams | 144 | 1375 | 86712 |
Geoffrey Burnstock | 141 | 1488 | 99525 |
Nick C. Fox | 139 | 748 | 93036 |
Christopher D.M. Fletcher | 138 | 674 | 82484 |
David A. Jackson | 136 | 1095 | 68352 |
Paul Harrison | 133 | 1400 | 80539 |
Roberto Ferrari | 133 | 1654 | 103824 |
David Taylor | 131 | 2469 | 93220 |
Keith Hawton | 125 | 657 | 55138 |
Nicole Soranzo | 124 | 316 | 74494 |
Roger Williams | 122 | 1455 | 72416 |
John C. Chambers | 122 | 645 | 71028 |
Derek M. Yellon | 122 | 638 | 54319 |