Institution
University of Cambridge
Education•Cambridge, United Kingdom•
About: University of Cambridge is a education organization based out in Cambridge, United Kingdom. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Galaxy. The organization has 118293 authors who have published 282289 publications receiving 14497093 citations. The organization is also known as: Cambridge University & Cambridge.
Topics: Population, Galaxy, Context (language use), Gene, Transplantation
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
••
University of Edinburgh1, University of Calgary2, Medical University of Graz3, The George Institute for Global Health4, University of Cambridge5, VU University Amsterdam6, University of British Columbia7, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre8, German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases9, Paris Diderot University10, University of California, Davis11, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre12, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich13, University College London14, Harvard University15, University of Western Ontario16, The Chinese University of Hong Kong17, Maastricht University18, University of Florence19, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg20, Newcastle University21, National University of Singapore22, Leiden University Medical Center23, University of Saint Mary24
TL;DR: This Position Paper summarises the main outcomes of this international effort to provide the STandards for ReportIng Vascular changes on nEuroimaging (STRIVE).
Abstract: Cerebral small vessel disease (SVD) is a common accompaniment of ageing. Features seen on neuroimaging include recent small subcortical infarcts, lacunes, white matter hyperintensities, perivascular spaces, microbleeds, and brain atrophy. SVD can present as a stroke or cognitive decline, or can have few or no symptoms. SVD frequently coexists with neurodegenerative disease, and can exacerbate cognitive deficits, physical disabilities, and other symptoms of neurodegeneration. Terminology and definitions for imaging the features of SVD vary widely, which is also true for protocols for image acquisition and image analysis. This lack of consistency hampers progress in identifying the contribution of SVD to the pathophysiology and clinical features of common neurodegenerative diseases. We are an international working group from the Centres of Excellence in Neurodegeneration. We completed a structured process to develop definitions and imaging standards for markers and consequences of SVD. We aimed to achieve the following: first, to provide a common advisory about terms and definitions for features visible on MRI; second, to suggest minimum standards for image acquisition and analysis; third, to agree on standards for scientific reporting of changes related to SVD on neuroimaging; and fourth, to review emerging imaging methods for detection and quantification of preclinical manifestations of SVD. Our findings and recommendations apply to research studies, and can be used in the clinical setting to standardise image interpretation, acquisition, and reporting. This Position Paper summarises the main outcomes of this international effort to provide the STandards for ReportIng Vascular changes on nEuroimaging (STRIVE).
3,691 citations
••
TL;DR: New MRC guidance provides a framework for conducting and reporting process evaluation studies that will help improve the quality of decision-making in the design and testing of complex interventions.
Abstract: Process evaluation is an essential part of designing and testing complex interventions. New MRC guidance provides a framework for conducting and reporting process evaluation studies
3,662 citations
••
TL;DR: The authors tried to answer the question: When is a random variable Y "more variable" than another random variable X "less variable" by asking when a variable X is more variable than another variable Y.
3,655 citations
••
3,645 citations
••
University of Trento1, University of California, San Francisco2, Johns Hopkins University3, Northwestern University4, University of Western Ontario5, University of California, Los Angeles6, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University7, University College London8, University of Toronto9, Mayo Clinic10, University of California, Davis11, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven12, University of Cambridge13, University of New South Wales14, University of Pennsylvania15
TL;DR: This article provides a classification of primary progressive aphasia (PPA) and its 3 main variants to improve the uniformity of case reporting and the reliability of research results.
Abstract: This article provides a classification of primary progressive aphasia (PPA) and its 3 main variants to improve the uniformity of case reporting and the reliability of research results. Criteria for the 3 variants of PPA—nonfluent/agrammatic, semantic, and logopenic—were developed by an international group of PPA investigators who convened on 3 occasions to operationalize earlier published clinical descriptions for PPA subtypes. Patients are first diagnosed with PPA and are then divided into clinical variants based on specific speech and language features characteristic of each subtype. Classification can then be further specified as “imaging-supported” if the expected pattern of atrophy is found and “with definite pathology” if pathologic or genetic data are available. The working recommendations are presented in lists of features, and suggested assessment tasks are also provided. These recommendations have been widely agreed upon by a large group of experts and should be used to ensure consistency of PPA classification in future studies. Future collaborations will collect prospective data to identify relationships between each of these syndromes and specific biomarkers for a more detailed understanding of clinicopathologic correlations.
3,635 citations
Authors
Showing all 119522 results
Name | H-index | Papers | Citations |
---|---|---|---|
Albert Hofman | 267 | 2530 | 321405 |
Zhong Lin Wang | 245 | 2529 | 259003 |
Solomon H. Snyder | 232 | 1222 | 200444 |
Trevor W. Robbins | 231 | 1137 | 164437 |
George Davey Smith | 224 | 2540 | 248373 |
Nicholas J. Wareham | 212 | 1657 | 204896 |
Cyrus Cooper | 204 | 1869 | 206782 |
Eric B. Rimm | 196 | 988 | 147119 |
Martin White | 196 | 2038 | 232387 |
Simon D. M. White | 189 | 795 | 231645 |
Michael Rutter | 188 | 676 | 151592 |
George Efstathiou | 187 | 637 | 156228 |
Mark Hallett | 186 | 1170 | 123741 |
David H. Weinberg | 183 | 700 | 171424 |
Paul G. Richardson | 183 | 1533 | 155912 |