scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

University of Iowa

EducationIowa City, Iowa, United States
About: University of Iowa is a education organization based out in Iowa City, Iowa, United States. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Poison control. The organization has 49229 authors who have published 109171 publications receiving 5021465 citations. The organization is also known as: UI & The University of Iowa.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Treatment with lutetium‐177 (177Lu)–Dotatate resulted in markedly longer progression‐free survival and a significantly higher response rate than high‐dose octreotide LAR among patients with advanced midgut neuroendocrine tumors.
Abstract: BackgroundPatients with advanced midgut neuroendocrine tumors who have had disease progression during first-line somatostatin analogue therapy have limited therapeutic options. This randomized, controlled trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of lutetium-177 (177Lu)–Dotatate in patients with advanced, progressive, somatostatin-receptor–positive midgut neuroendocrine tumors. MethodsWe randomly assigned 229 patients who had well-differentiated, metastatic midgut neuroendocrine tumors to receive either 177Lu-Dotatate (116 patients) at a dose of 7.4 GBq every 8 weeks (four intravenous infusions, plus best supportive care including octreotide long-acting repeatable [LAR] administered intramuscularly at a dose of 30 mg) (177Lu-Dotatate group) or octreotide LAR alone (113 patients) administered intramuscularly at a dose of 60 mg every 4 weeks (control group). The primary end point was progression-free survival. Secondary end points included the objective response rate, overall survival, safety, and the side-ef...

1,975 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The first consensus-based operational criteria for symptomatic remission in schizophrenia are based on distinct thresholds for reaching and maintaining improvement, as opposed to change criteria, allowing for alignment with traditional concepts of remission in both psychiatric and nonpsychiatric illness.
Abstract: New advances in the understanding of schizophrenia etiology, course, and treatment have increased interest on the part of patients, families, advocates, and professionals in the development of consensus-defined standards for clinical status and improvement, including illness remission and recovery As demonstrated in the area of mood disorders, such standards provide greater clarity around treatment goals, as well as an improved framework for the design and comparison of investigational trials and the subsequent evaluation of the effectiveness of interventions Unlike the approach to mood disorders, however, the novel application of the concept of standard outcome criteria to schizophrenia must reflect the wide heterogeneity of its long-term course and outcome, as well as the variable effects of different treatments on schizophrenia symptoms As an initial step in developing operational criteria, an expert working group reviewed available definitions and assessment instruments to provide a conceptual framework for symptomatic, functional, and cognitive domains in schizophrenia as they relate to remission of illness The first consensus-based operational criteria for symptomatic remission in schizophrenia are based on distinct thresholds for reaching and maintaining improvement, as opposed to change criteria, allowing for alignment with traditional concepts of remission in both psychiatric and nonpsychiatric illness This innovative approach for standardizing the definition for outcome in schizophrenia will require further examination of its validity and utility, as well as future refinement, particularly in relation to psychosocial and cognitive function and dysfunction These criteria should facilitate research and support a positive, longer-term approach to studying outcome in patients with schizophrenia

1,964 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors examined how consumer decision making is influenced by automatically evoked task-induced affect and by cognitions that are generated in a more controlled manner on exposure to alternatives in a choice task.
Abstract: This article examines how consumer decision making is influenced by automatically evoked task-induced affect and by cognitions that are generated in a more controlled manner on exposure to alternatives in a choice task. Across two experiments respondents chose between two alternatives: one (chocolate cake) associated with more intense positive affect but less favorable cognitions, compared to a second (fruit salad) associated with less favorable affect but more favorable cognitions. Findings from the two experiments suggest that if processing resources are limited, spontaneously evoked affective reactions rather than cognitions tend to have a greater impact on choice. As a result, the consumer is more likely to choose the alternative that is superior on the affective dimension but inferior on the cognitive dimension (e.g., chocolate cake). In contrast, when the availability of processing resources is high, cognitions related to the consequences of choosing the alternatives tend to have a bigger impact on choice compared to when the availability of these resources is low. As a result, the consumer is more likely to choose the alternative that is inferior on the affective dimension but superior on the cognitive dimension (e.g., fruit salad). The moderating roles of the mode of presentation of the alternatives and of a personality variable related to impulsivity are also reported.

1,955 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, a field test of two shorter forms of the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression (CES-D) symptoms index was conducted in a multisite survey of persons 65 and older.
Abstract: Brief measurement devices can alleviate respondent burden and lower refusal rates in surveys. This article reports on a field test of two shorter forms of the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression (CES-D) symptoms index in a multisite survey of persons 65 and older. Factor analyses demonstrate that the briefer forms tap the same symptoms dimensions as does the original CES-D, and reliability statistics indicate that they sacrifice little precision. Simple transformations are presented to how scores from the briefer forms can be compared to those of the original.

1,949 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Little evidence is found that estimates of treatment effects in observational studies reported after 1984 are either consistently larger than or qualitatively different from those obtained in randomized, controlled trials.
Abstract: Background For many years it has been claimed that observational studies find stronger treatment effects than randomized, controlled trials We compared the results of observational studies with those of randomized, controlled trials Methods We searched the Abridged Index Medicus and Cochrane data bases to identify observational studies reported between 1985 and 1998 that compared two or more treatments or interventions for the same condition We then searched the Medline and Cochrane data bases to identify all the randomized, controlled trials and observational studies comparing the same treatments for these conditions For each treatment, the magnitudes of the effects in the various observational studies were combined by the Mantel-Haenszel or weighted analysis-of-variance procedure and then compared with the combined magnitude of the effects in the randomized, controlled trials that evaluated the same treatment Results There were 136 reports about 19 diverse treatments, such as calcium-channel-blocker therapy for coronary artery disease, appendectomy, and interventions for subfertility In most cases, the estimates of the treatment effects from observational studies and randomized, controlled trials were similar In only 2 of the 19 analyses of treatment effects did the combined magnitude of the effect in observational studies lie outside the 95 percent confidence interval for the combined magnitude in the randomized, controlled trials Conclusions We found little evidence that estimates of treatment effects in observational studies reported after 1984 are either consistently larger than or qualitatively different from those obtained in randomized, controlled trials

1,946 citations


Authors

Showing all 49661 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
Stephen V. Faraone1881427140298
Jie Zhang1784857221720
D. M. Strom1763167194314
Bradley T. Hyman169765136098
John H. Seinfeld165921114911
David Jonathan Hofman1591407140442
Stephen J. O'Brien153106293025
John T. Cacioppo147477110223
Mark Raymond Adams1471187135038
E. L. Barberio1431605115709
Andrew Ivanov142181297390
Stephen J. Lippard141120189269
Russell Richard Betts140132395678
Barry Blumenfeld1401909105694
Marcus Hohlmann140135694739
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
University of Washington
305.5K papers, 17.7M citations

95% related

Columbia University
224K papers, 12.8M citations

95% related

University of California, San Diego
204.5K papers, 12.3M citations

94% related

University of Michigan
342.3K papers, 17.6M citations

94% related

Harvard University
530.3K papers, 38.1M citations

94% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
2023154
2022727
20214,129
20203,902
20193,763
20183,659