scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

EducationChapel Hill, North Carolina, United States
About: University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill is a education organization based out in Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Poison control. The organization has 81393 authors who have published 185327 publications receiving 9948508 citations. The organization is also known as: University of North Carolina & North Carolina.


Papers
More filters
Proceedings ArticleDOI
01 Jul 2000
TL;DR: This paper describes an efficient image-based approach to computing and shading visual hulls from silhouette image data that takes advantage of epipolar geometry and incremental computation to achieve a constant rendering cost per rendered pixel.
Abstract: In this paper, we describe an efficient image-based approach to computing and shading visual hulls from silhouette image data. Our algorithm takes advantage of epipolar geometry and incremental computation to achieve a constant rendering cost per rendered pixel. It does not suffer from the computation complexity, limited resolution, or quantization artifacts of previous volumetric approaches. We demonstrate the use of this algorithm in a real-time virtualized reality application running off a small number of video streams.

1,018 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This article presents international consensus criteria for and classification of AbAR developed based on discussions held at the Sixth Banff Conference on Allograft Pathology in 2001, to be revisited as additional data accumulate in this important area of renal transplantation.

1,018 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
17 Apr 2009-Immunity
TL;DR: Mechanistically, NLRP3 inflammasome activation by the influenza virus was dependent on lysosomal maturation and reactive oxygen species (ROS), and inhibition of ROS induction eliminated IL-1beta production in animals during influenza infection.

1,017 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: A detailed review of the physical properties of molecular brushers can be found in this article, with particular focus on synthesis via controlled radical polymerization techniques, where the authors present several strategies for their preparation.

1,015 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In addition to frequency-dependent attenuation, two kinds of degradation during atmospheric transmission will limit a receiver's ability to resolve differences among acoustic signals: the accumulation of irregular amplitude fluctuations from nonstationary heterogeneities, often atmospheric turbulence, and reverberation.
Abstract: 1. Acoustic communication requires not only detection of the signal but also discrimination of differences among signals by the receiver. Attenuation and degradation of acoustic signals during transmission through the atmosphere will impose limits on acoustic communication. Attenuation of sound during atmospheric transmission results primarily from atmospheric absorption, ground attenuation, scattering of a sound beam, and deflection of sound by stratified media. For maximum range of detection, therefore, animals should favor optimal positions in their habitat and optimal weather conditions. Frequency-dependent attenuation seems not to differ consistently among major classes of terrestrial habitats, such as forests and fields. Increased scattering of higher frequencies from vegetation in forests is in part matched by scattering from micrometerological heterogeneities in the open. 2. In addition to frequency-dependent attenuation, two kinds of degradation during atmospheric transmission will limit a receiver's ability to resolve differences among acoustic signals: the accumulation of irregular amplitude fluctuations from nonstationary heterogeneities, often atmospheric turbulence, and reverberation. Both types of degradation affect temporal patterns of amplitude or intensity modulation more than patterns of frequency modulation. Both effects should increase with carrier frequency, as they depend on the relationship between wavelength and the dimensions of scattering heterogeneities. Irregular amplitude fluctuations are more severe in open habitats and primarily mask low frequencies of amplitude modulation; reverberations are more severe in forested habitats and primarily mask high frequencies of amplitude modulation and rapid, repetitive frequency modulation. This difference between forested and open habitats could explain previous reports that birds in the undergrowth of tropical forests avoid rapid frequency modulation in their long-range vocalizations. 3. Maximum range of detection is probably not the primary selection pressure on many animal vocalizations, even for territorial advertisement, except perhaps in tropical forests. Instead, acoustic signals might incorporate features that degrade predictably with range to permit a receiver to estimate the signaler's distance. Future investigations might explore the propagation of animal vocalizations in relation to the usual spacing of animals in their habitat. Features that encode different kinds of information, such as individual and species identity, might propagate to different distances. 4. Measurements of the transmission of sound in natural environments have often not controlled several important parameters. First, the effects of gound attenuation and scattering are not linear with range; consequently measurements of excess attenuation over different ranges in the same environment might differ. Second, the directionality of speakers and microphones will affect measurements of attenuation and reverberations in scattering environments. Third, as stationary waves shift with frequency, any single microphone placement will lie in a null for some frequencies and in a maximum for others.

1,015 citations


Authors

Showing all 82249 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
Walter C. Willett3342399413322
Salim Yusuf2311439252912
David J. Hunter2131836207050
Irving L. Weissman2011141172504
Eric J. Topol1931373151025
Dennis W. Dickson1911243148488
Scott M. Grundy187841231821
Peidong Yang183562144351
Patrick O. Brown183755200985
Eric Boerwinkle1831321170971
Alan C. Evans183866134642
Anil K. Jain1831016192151
Terrie E. Moffitt182594150609
Aaron R. Folsom1811118134044
Valentin Fuster1791462185164
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
University of Washington
305.5K papers, 17.7M citations

98% related

Yale University
220.6K papers, 12.8M citations

97% related

University of Pennsylvania
257.6K papers, 14.1M citations

97% related

Columbia University
224K papers, 12.8M citations

97% related

Harvard University
530.3K papers, 38.1M citations

97% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
2023311
20221,325
202110,885
20209,949
20199,108
20188,477