scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

EducationChapel Hill, North Carolina, United States
About: University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill is a education organization based out in Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Poison control. The organization has 81393 authors who have published 185327 publications receiving 9948508 citations. The organization is also known as: University of North Carolina & North Carolina.


Papers
More filters
Book ChapterDOI
01 Jan 2003
TL;DR: The life histories and future trajectories of individuals and groups were largely neglected by early sociological research as discussed by the authors, and the life course perspective is perhaps the pre-eminent theoretical orientation in the study of lives.
Abstract: Today, the life course perspective is perhaps the pre-eminent theoretical orientation in the study of lives, but this has not always been the case. The life histories and future trajectories of individuals and groups were largely neglected by early sociological research. In the pioneering study, The Polish Peasant in Europe and America (1918-1920), W. I. Thomas (with Florian Znaniecki) first made use of such histories and trajectories and argued strongly that they be investigated more fully by sociologists. By the mid-1920s, Thomas was emphasizing the vital need for a “longitudinal approach to life history” using life record data (Volkart, 1951, p. 593). He advocated that studies investigate “many types of individuals with regard to their experiences and various past periods of life in different situations” and follow “groups of individuals into the future, getting a continuous record of experiences as they occur.” Though this advice went unheeded for decades, Thomas’s early recommendations anticipated study of the life course and longitudinal research that has become such a central part of modern sociology and other disciplines.

2,401 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This document is developed for physicians and healthcare providers who are involved in athlete care, whether at a recreational, elite or professional level, and provides an overview of issues that may be of importance to healthcare providers involved in the management of SRC.
Abstract: The 2017 Concussion in Sport Group (CISG) consensus statement is designed to build on the principles outlined in the previous statements1–4 and to develop further conceptual understanding of sport-related concussion (SRC) using an expert consensus-based approach. This document is developed for physicians and healthcare providers who are involved in athlete care, whether at a recreational, elite or professional level. While agreement exists on the principal messages conveyed by this document, the authors acknowledge that the science of SRC is evolving and therefore individual management and return-to-play decisions remain in the realm of clinical judgement. This consensus document reflects the current state of knowledge and will need to be modified as new knowledge develops. It provides an overview of issues that may be of importance to healthcare providers involved in the management of SRC. This paper should be read in conjunction with the systematic reviews and methodology paper that accompany it. First and foremost, this document is intended to guide clinical practice; however, the authors feel that it can also help form the agenda for future research relevant to SRC by identifying knowledge gaps. A series of specific clinical questions were developed as part of the consensus process for the Berlin 2016 meeting. Each consensus question was the subject of a specific formal systematic review, which is published concurrently with this summary statement. Readers are directed to these background papers in conjunction with this summary statement as they provide the context for the issues and include the scope of published research, search strategy and citations reviewed for each question. This 2017 consensus statement also summarises each topic and recommendations in the context of all five CISG meetings (that is, 2001, 2004, 2008, 2012 as well as 2016). Approximately 60 000 published articles were screened by the expert panels for the Berlin …

2,388 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Stochasticity in gene expression can provide the flexibility needed by cells to adapt to fluctuating environments or respond to sudden stresses, and a mechanism by which population heterogeneity can be established during cellular differentiation and development.
Abstract: Genetically identical cells exposed to the same environmental conditions can show significant variation in molecular content and marked differences in phenotypic characteristics. This variability is linked to stochasticity in gene expression, which is generally viewed as having detrimental effects on cellular function with potential implications for disease. However, stochasticity in gene expression can also be advantageous. It can provide the flexibility needed by cells to adapt to fluctuating environments or respond to sudden stresses, and a mechanism by which population heterogeneity can be established during cellular differentiation and development.

2,381 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Mingxun Wang1, Jeremy Carver1, Vanessa V. Phelan2, Laura M. Sanchez2, Neha Garg2, Yao Peng1, Don D. Nguyen1, Jeramie D. Watrous2, Clifford A. Kapono1, Tal Luzzatto-Knaan2, Carla Porto2, Amina Bouslimani2, Alexey V. Melnik2, Michael J. Meehan2, Wei-Ting Liu3, Max Crüsemann4, Paul D. Boudreau4, Eduardo Esquenazi, Mario Sandoval-Calderón5, Roland D. Kersten6, Laura A. Pace2, Robert A. Quinn7, Katherine R. Duncan8, Cheng-Chih Hsu1, Dimitrios J. Floros1, Ronnie G. Gavilan, Karin Kleigrewe4, Trent R. Northen9, Rachel J. Dutton10, Delphine Parrot11, Erin E. Carlson12, Bertrand Aigle13, Charlotte Frydenlund Michelsen14, Lars Jelsbak14, Christian Sohlenkamp5, Pavel A. Pevzner1, Anna Edlund15, Anna Edlund16, Jeffrey S. McLean17, Jeffrey S. McLean16, Jörn Piel18, Brian T. Murphy19, Lena Gerwick4, Chih-Chuang Liaw20, Yu-Liang Yang21, Hans-Ulrich Humpf22, Maria Maansson14, Robert A. Keyzers23, Amy C. Sims24, Andrew R. Johnson25, Ashley M. Sidebottom25, Brian E. Sedio26, Andreas Klitgaard14, Charles B. Larson4, Charles B. Larson2, Cristopher A. Boya P., Daniel Torres-Mendoza, David Gonzalez2, Denise Brentan Silva27, Denise Brentan Silva28, Lucas Miranda Marques27, Daniel P. Demarque27, Egle Pociute, Ellis C. O’Neill4, Enora Briand4, Enora Briand11, Eric J. N. Helfrich18, Eve A. Granatosky29, Evgenia Glukhov4, Florian Ryffel18, Hailey Houson, Hosein Mohimani1, Jenan J. Kharbush4, Yi Zeng1, Julia A. Vorholt18, Kenji L. Kurita30, Pep Charusanti1, Kerry L. McPhail31, Kristian Fog Nielsen14, Lisa Vuong, Maryam Elfeki19, Matthew F. Traxler32, Niclas Engene33, Nobuhiro Koyama2, Oliver B. Vining31, Ralph S. Baric24, Ricardo Pianta Rodrigues da Silva27, Samantha J. Mascuch4, Sophie Tomasi11, Stefan Jenkins9, Venkat R. Macherla, Thomas Hoffman, Vinayak Agarwal4, Philip G. Williams34, Jingqui Dai34, Ram P. Neupane34, Joshua R. Gurr34, Andrés M. C. Rodríguez27, Anne Lamsa1, Chen Zhang1, Kathleen Dorrestein2, Brendan M. Duggan2, Jehad Almaliti2, Pierre-Marie Allard35, Prasad Phapale, Louis-Félix Nothias36, Theodore Alexandrov, Marc Litaudon36, Jean-Luc Wolfender35, Jennifer E. Kyle37, Thomas O. Metz37, Tyler Peryea38, Dac-Trung Nguyen38, Danielle VanLeer38, Paul Shinn38, Ajit Jadhav38, Rolf Müller, Katrina M. Waters37, Wenyuan Shi16, Xueting Liu39, Lixin Zhang39, Rob Knight1, Paul R. Jensen4, Bernhard O. Palsson1, Kit Pogliano1, Roger G. Linington30, Marcelino Gutiérrez, Norberto Peporine Lopes27, William H. Gerwick4, William H. Gerwick2, Bradley S. Moore4, Bradley S. Moore2, Pieter C. Dorrestein2, Pieter C. Dorrestein4, Nuno Bandeira2, Nuno Bandeira1 
TL;DR: In GNPS, crowdsourced curation of freely available community-wide reference MS libraries will underpin improved annotations and data-driven social-networking should facilitate identification of spectra and foster collaborations.
Abstract: The potential of the diverse chemistries present in natural products (NP) for biotechnology and medicine remains untapped because NP databases are not searchable with raw data and the NP community has no way to share data other than in published papers. Although mass spectrometry (MS) techniques are well-suited to high-throughput characterization of NP, there is a pressing need for an infrastructure to enable sharing and curation of data. We present Global Natural Products Social Molecular Networking (GNPS; http://gnps.ucsd.edu), an open-access knowledge base for community-wide organization and sharing of raw, processed or identified tandem mass (MS/MS) spectrometry data. In GNPS, crowdsourced curation of freely available community-wide reference MS libraries will underpin improved annotations. Data-driven social-networking should facilitate identification of spectra and foster collaborations. We also introduce the concept of 'living data' through continuous reanalysis of deposited data.

2,365 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
26 Aug 2010-Nature
TL;DR: It is demonstrated that all three mouse Tet proteins (Tet1, Tet2 and Tet3) can also catalyse a similar reaction, uncover the enzymatic activity of the Tet proteins, and demonstrate a role for Tet1 in ES cell maintenance and inner cell mass cell specification.
Abstract: DNA methylation is one of the best-characterized epigenetic modifications. Although the enzymes that catalyse DNA methylation have been characterized, enzymes responsible for demethylation have been elusive. A recent study indicates that the human TET1 protein could catalyse the conversion of 5-methylcytosine (5mC) of DNA to 5-hydroxymethylcytosine (5hmC), raising the possibility that DNA demethylation may be a Tet1-mediated process. Here we extend this study by demonstrating that all three mouse Tet proteins (Tet1, Tet2 and Tet3) can also catalyse a similar reaction. Tet1 has an important role in mouse embryonic stem (ES) cell maintenance through maintaining the expression of Nanog in ES cells. Downregulation of Nanog via Tet1 knockdown correlates with methylation of the Nanog promoter, supporting a role for Tet1 in regulating DNA methylation status. Furthermore, knockdown of Tet1 in pre-implantation embryos results in a bias towards trophectoderm differentiation. Thus, our studies not only uncover the enzymatic activity of the Tet proteins, but also demonstrate a role for Tet1 in ES cell maintenance and inner cell mass cell specification.

2,364 citations


Authors

Showing all 82249 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
Walter C. Willett3342399413322
Salim Yusuf2311439252912
David J. Hunter2131836207050
Irving L. Weissman2011141172504
Eric J. Topol1931373151025
Dennis W. Dickson1911243148488
Scott M. Grundy187841231821
Peidong Yang183562144351
Patrick O. Brown183755200985
Eric Boerwinkle1831321170971
Alan C. Evans183866134642
Anil K. Jain1831016192151
Terrie E. Moffitt182594150609
Aaron R. Folsom1811118134044
Valentin Fuster1791462185164
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
University of Washington
305.5K papers, 17.7M citations

98% related

Yale University
220.6K papers, 12.8M citations

97% related

University of Pennsylvania
257.6K papers, 14.1M citations

97% related

Columbia University
224K papers, 12.8M citations

97% related

Harvard University
530.3K papers, 38.1M citations

97% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
2023311
20221,325
202110,885
20209,949
20199,108
20188,477