Institution
University of Potsdam
Education•Potsdam, Germany•
About: University of Potsdam is a education organization based out in Potsdam, Germany. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Computer science. The organization has 9629 authors who have published 26740 publications receiving 759745 citations. The organization is also known as: Universität Potsdam.
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
••
TL;DR: A suite of ecological interactions previously underestimated in importance have become research foci: overwintering of key organisms, the microbial food web, parasitism, and food quality as a limiting factor and an extended role of higher order predators.
Abstract: The seasonal succession of plankton is an annually repeated process of community assembly during which all major external factors and internal interactions shaping communities can be studied. A quarter of a century ago, the state of this understanding was described by the verbal plankton ecology group (PEG) model. It emphasized the role of physical factors, grazing and nutrient limitation for phytoplankton, and the role of food limitation and fish predation for zooplankton. Although originally targeted at lake ecosystems, it was also adopted by marine plankton ecologists. Since then, a suite of ecological interactions previously underestimated in importance have become research foci: overwintering of key organisms, the microbial food web, parasitism, and food quality as a limiting factor and an extended role of higher order predators. A review of the impact of these novel interactions on plankton seasonal succession reveals limited effects on gross seasonal biomass patterns, but strong effects on species replacements.
558 citations
••
TL;DR: The question of how to communicate the performance of a model to potential end-users is currently receiving increasing interest, and it is observed that researchers take much less care when communicating model performance amongst ourselves.
Abstract: How Do We Communicate Model Performance? The process of model performance evaluation is of primary importance, not only in the model development and calibration process, but also when communicating the results to other researchers and to stakeholders. The basic ‘rule’ is that every modelling result should be put into context, for example, by indicating the model performance using appropriate indicators, and by highlighting potential sources of uncertainty, and this practice has found its entry into the large majority of papers and conference presentations. While the question of how to communicate the performance of a model to potential end-users is currently receiving increasing interest (e.g. Pappenberger and Beven, 2006), we–as well as many other colleagues–observe regularly that researchers take much less care when communicating model performance amongst ourselves. We seem to assume that we are speaking about familiar performance concepts and that they have comparable significance for various types of model applications and case studies. In doing so, we do not pay sufficient attention to making clear what the values represented by our performance measures really mean. Even concepts as simple as the bias between an observed and a simulated time series need to be put into proper context: whereas a 10% bias in simulation of simulated discharge may be unacceptable in a climate change impact assessment, it may be of less concern in the context of real-time flood forecasting. While some performance measures can have an absolute meaning, such as the common measure of linear correlation, the vast majority of performance measures, and in particular quadratic-error-based measures, can only be properly interpreted when viewed in the context of a reference value (..)
557 citations
••
Vienna University of Technology1, University of Potsdam2, Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute3, University of Messina4, University of Split5, University of Padua6, University of Zagreb7, University of Bologna8, University of Naples Federico II9, Polytechnic University of Turin10, Moscow State University11, Dokuz Eylül University12, University of Bath13, Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava14, Finnish Environment Institute15, Czech Hydrometeorological Institute16, University of Liverpool17, University of Architecture, Civil Engineering and Geodesy18, Technical University of Madrid19, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ20, ETH Zurich21, Maynooth University22, Polish Academy of Sciences23, ODESSA24, University of Ljubljana25, Roma Tre University26, Norwegian Water Resources and Energy Directorate27, Polytechnic University of Tirana28, University of Belgrade29
TL;DR: Analysis of the timing of river floods in Europe over the past 50 years found clear patterns of changes in flood timing that can be ascribed to climate effects, and highlights the existence of a clear climate signal in flood observations at the continental scale.
Abstract: A warming climate is expected to have an impact on the magnitude and timing of river floods; however, no consistent large-scale climate change signal in observed flood magnitudes has been identified so far. We analyzed the timing of river floods in Europe over the past five decades, using a pan-European database from 4262 observational hydrometric stations, and found clear patterns of change in flood timing. Warmer temperatures have led to earlier spring snowmelt floods throughout northeastern Europe; delayed winter storms associated with polar warming have led to later winter floods around the North Sea and some sectors of the Mediterranean coast; and earlier soil moisture maxima have led to earlier winter floods in western Europe. Our results highlight the existence of a clear climate signal in flood observations at the continental scale.
557 citations
••
TL;DR: The aim of the present review is to summarize the recent advances in research on ROS-induced PCD related to abiotic stress and the role of the organelles in the process.
Abstract: During the course of their ontogenesis plants are continuously exposed to a large variety of abiotic stress factors which can damage tissues and jeopardize the survival of the organism unless properly countered. While animals can simply escape and thus evade stressors, plants as sessile organisms have developed complex strategies to withstand them. When the intensity of a detrimental factor is high, one of the defense programs employed by plants is the induction of programmed cell death (PCD). This is an active, genetically controlled process which is initiated to isolate and remove damaged tissues thereby ensuring the survival of the organism. The mechanism of PCD induction usually includes an increase in the levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS) which are utilized as mediators of the stress signal. Abiotic stress-induced PCD is not only a process of fundamental biological importance, but also of considerable interest to agricultural practice as it has the potential to significantly influence crop yield. Therefore, numerous scientific enterprises have focused on elucidating the mechanisms leading to and controlling PCD in response to adverse conditions in plants. This knowledge may help develop novel strategies to obtain more resilient crop varieties with improved tolerance and enhanced productivity. The aim of the present review is to summarize the recent advances in research on ROS-induced PCD related to abiotic stress and the role of the organelles in the process.
550 citations
••
TL;DR: In this article, the authors provide an assessment of key impacts of climate change at warming levels of 1.5°C and 2°C, including extreme weather events, water availability, agricultural yields, sea-level rise and risk of coral reef loss.
Abstract: . Robust appraisals of climate impacts at different levels of global-mean temperature increase are vital to guide assessments of dangerous anthropogenic interference with the climate system. The 2015 Paris Agreement includes a two-headed temperature goal: "holding the increase in the global average temperature to well below 2 °C above pre-industrial levels and pursuing efforts to limit the temperature increase to 1.5 °C". Despite the prominence of these two temperature limits, a comprehensive overview of the differences in climate impacts at these levels is still missing. Here we provide an assessment of key impacts of climate change at warming levels of 1.5 °C and 2 °C, including extreme weather events, water availability, agricultural yields, sea-level rise and risk of coral reef loss. Our results reveal substantial differences in impacts between a 1.5 °C and 2 °C warming that are highly relevant for the assessment of dangerous anthropogenic interference with the climate system. For heat-related extremes, the additional 0.5 °C increase in global-mean temperature marks the difference between events at the upper limit of present-day natural variability and a new climate regime, particularly in tropical regions. Similarly, this warming difference is likely to be decisive for the future of tropical coral reefs. In a scenario with an end-of-century warming of 2 °C, virtually all tropical coral reefs are projected to be at risk of severe degradation due to temperature-induced bleaching from 2050 onwards. This fraction is reduced to about 90 % in 2050 and projected to decline to 70 % by 2100 for a 1.5 °C scenario. Analyses of precipitation-related impacts reveal distinct regional differences and hot-spots of change emerge. Regional reduction in median water availability for the Mediterranean is found to nearly double from 9 % to 17 % between 1.5 °C and 2 °C, and the projected lengthening of regional dry spells increases from 7 to 11 %. Projections for agricultural yields differ between crop types as well as world regions. While some (in particular high-latitude) regions may benefit, tropical regions like West Africa, South-East Asia, as well as Central and northern South America are projected to face substantial local yield reductions, particularly for wheat and maize. Best estimate sea-level rise projections based on two illustrative scenarios indicate a 50 cm rise by 2100 relative to year 2000-levels for a 2 °C scenario, and about 10 cm lower levels for a 1.5 °C scenario. In a 1.5 °C scenario, the rate of sea-level rise in 2100 would be reduced by about 30 % compared to a 2 °C scenario. Our findings highlight the importance of regional differentiation to assess both future climate risks and different vulnerabilities to incremental increases in global-mean temperature. The article provides a consistent and comprehensive assessment of existing projections and a good basis for future work on refining our understanding of the difference between impacts at 1.5 °C and 2 °C warming.
549 citations
Authors
Showing all 9969 results
Name | H-index | Papers | Citations |
---|---|---|---|
Cyrus Cooper | 204 | 1869 | 206782 |
Markus Antonietti | 176 | 1068 | 127235 |
Marc Weber | 167 | 2716 | 153502 |
Peter Capak | 147 | 679 | 70483 |
Heiner Boeing | 140 | 1024 | 92580 |
Alisdair R. Fernie | 133 | 1010 | 64026 |
Klaus-Robert Müller | 129 | 764 | 79391 |
Claudia Felser | 113 | 1198 | 58589 |
Guochun Zhao | 113 | 406 | 40886 |
Matthias Steinmetz | 112 | 461 | 67802 |
Jürgen Kurths | 105 | 1038 | 62179 |
Peter Schmidt | 105 | 638 | 61822 |
Erwin P. Bottinger | 102 | 342 | 42089 |
Knud Jahnke | 94 | 352 | 31542 |
Gerd Gigerenzer | 94 | 533 | 52356 |