Binding, Domain Orientation, and Dynamics of the Lck SH3−SH2 Domain Pair and Comparison with Other Src-Family Kinases†
read more
Citations
T-cell receptor proximal signaling via the Src-family kinases, Lck and Fyn, influences T-cell activation, differentiation, and tolerance.
Structure and dynamic regulation of Src-family kinases.
NMR identification of transient complexes critical to adenylate kinase catalysis.
Progress towards the development of SH2 domain inhibitors
Binding of the proline-rich segment of myelin basic protein to SH3 domains: spectroscopic, microarray, and modeling studies of ligand conformation and effects of posttranslational modifications.
References
Model-free approach to the interpretation of nuclear magnetic resonance relaxation in macromolecules. 1. Theory and range of validity
SH2 domains recognize specific phosphopeptide sequences
Cellular functions regulated by src family kinases
Related Papers (5)
Three-dimensional structure of the tyrosine kinase c-Src
Frequently Asked Questions (14)
Q2. What was used to produce the Lck and Fyn peptides?
Minimal medium with 15NH4Cl and if necessary D2O instead of H2O was used to produce 15N-labeled Lck SH32 and 15N,2H-labeled Fyn SH32.
Q3. What was the method used for the peptide titrations?
For the peptide titrations, aliquots of peptide of known concentration were first dried using a Speed-Vac apparatus and successive aliquots were then dissolved in the sample solution.
Q4. What is the role of a ligand in the interaction between Lck and Fy?
With respect to domain-domain interactions, chemical shift changes in the domain that is not involved in direct binding of the respective ligand are of particular interest, because these indicate possible propagation of structural changes from one domain to the other.
Q5. What is the reason for the greater flexibility of the linker region in Lck SH32?
The greater flexibility of the linker region in Lck SH32 as compared to Fyn SH32 (14), and the absence of interdomain coupling, can be rationalized by the different composition of its linker.
Q6. Why was the Lck linker chosen for these rotations?
Residue E123 in the Lck SH32 linker was chosen as a hinge for theserotations because, in heteronuclear NOE, experiments revealed an exceptionally high flexibility (see below).
Q7. How many relaxation spectra were used for each experiment?
Each series of T1 and T2 measurements consisted of 8 autocorrelation spectra with increasing 15N relaxation time delays, chosen to sample approximately the entirety of the observed intensity decays.
Q8. How was the dissociation constant for Tip(167199) determined?
The dissociation constant, Kd, for the Tip(167199):Lck SH32 complex was determined to be 3.8 ( 0.2 µM using fluorescence spectroscopy.
Q9. What is the peptide from Herpesvirus saimiri?
The Tip peptide comprises residues 167-199 of the tyrosine-kinase interacting (Tip) protein from Herpesvirus saimiri strain C488 and the phosphorylated HMTA peptide the CQ(pY)EEIP sequence from the middle T antigen of hamster polyomavirus.
Q10. What is the description of the Lck SH32?
The presence of significant interdomain motion in Lck SH32 means that in solution this domain pair is best described as an ensemble of many possible domain orientations.
Q11. What is the role of a proline-rich sequence in the interaction between Lck and?
The herpesviral tyrosine kinase interacting protein (Tip) contains a proline-rich sequence [Tip(167-199)] that binds to the SH3 domains of several Src-family kinases (33), and this interaction was shown to be sufficient for a moderate activation of Lck (34).
Q12. What is the description of the rotational diffusion of Lck SH32?
According to this analysis the overall best description of the rotational diffusion of Lck SH32 treats the SH3 domains and SH2 as independent with a prolate diffusion tensor for the SH3 and an asymmetric tensor for SH2 domain.
Q13. How is the SH3-SH2 interface in LckRDC?
Compared to the conformations present in the crystal structures, the SH3-SH2 domain interface in LckRDC is approximately 3-4 times smaller, suggesting a decrease in stabilizing interactions.
Q14. What is the tumbling time for Lck SH32?
Treating Lck SH32 as one unit, the tumbling of the protein is best characterized by a prolate diffusion tensor with a tumbling time of 8.0 ( 0.02 ns and an axial ratio of 1.32 ( 0.05.