Copper Oxide Films Grown by Atomic Layer Deposition from Bis(tri-n-butylphosphane)copper(I)acetylacetonate on Ta, TaN, Ru, and SiO2
read more
Citations
Crystallinity of inorganic films grown by atomic layer deposition: Overview and general trends
Damascene copper electroplating for chip interconnections
Mixed Copper States in Anodized Cu Electrocatalyst for Stable and Selective Ethylene Production from CO2 Reduction.
Copper oxide as inorganic hole transport material for lead halide perovskite based solar cells
Atomic and molecular layer deposition: off the beaten track
References
Surface chemistry of atomic layer deposition: A case study for the trimethylaluminum/water process
Electronic structure of Cu2O and CuO
Damascene Copper electroplating for chip interconnections
Damascene copper electroplating for chip interconnections
Atomic Layer Deposition Chemistry: Recent Developments and Future Challenges†
Related Papers (5)
Atomic Layer Deposition of Ultrathin Copper Metal Films from a Liquid Copper(I) Amidinate Precursor
Frequently Asked Questions (23)
Q2. What are the contributions in "Copper oxide films grown by atomic layer deposition from bis(tri-n-butylphosphane)- copper(i)acetylacetonate on ta, tan, ru, and sio2" ?
The thermal atomic layer deposition ( ALD ) of copper oxide films from the non-fluorinated yet liquid precursor bis ( tri-n-butylphosphane ) copper ( I ) acetylacetonate, [ ( Bu3P ) 2Cu ( acac ) ], and wet O2 on Ta, TaN, Ru and SiO2 substrates at temperatures of < 160◦C is reported. With excellent adhesion of the ALD films on all substrates studied, the results are a promising basis for Cu seed layer ALD applicable to electrochemical Cu metallization in interconnects of ultralarge-scale integrated circuits.
Q3. What are the future works mentioned in the paper "Copper oxide films grown by atomic layer deposition from bis(tri-n-butylphosphane)- copper(i)acetylacetonate on ta, tan, ru, and sio2" ?
This is further supported by electron diffraction studies ( Fig. 9 ). Because the Cu 2p3/2 core level signal as well as an Auger peak for CuO are not developed, the authors can further conclude that Cu ( OH ) 2 is present in addition to Cu2O. The respective spectra displayed in Fig. 10 suggest that Cu ( OH ) 2 is only present toward the sample surface, while in the bulk of the ALD films Cu2O dominates as the Cu ( OH ) 2 peaks considerably decrease with increasing XPS take-off angle. The investigations further reveal the influence of TaN composition and processing temperature on the ALD film composition:
Q4. How did the temperature of the substrates affect the ALD process?
Temperatureindependent growth regimes, essential for ALD, were found at least up to 120◦C with GPC values of ∼ 0.1 Å for the metallic substrates.
Q5. What is the effect of higher process temperature on TaN?
higher process temperature also led to the formation of clusters of ∼ 20 nm on TaN and an increase of the GPC with temperature, being a clear sign of beginning CVD modes and thermal decomposition of the Cu precursor.
Q6. What was the process of evaporating the precursor?
After evaporating between 85 and 100◦C at a flow rate of 10 to 20 mg/min and mixing with carrier gas, the precursor vapor was transported to the deposition chamber via heated stainless steel tubes.
Q7. What is the name for the precursor?
As differential scanning calorimetric studies (DSC) of the molecule showed major decomposition peaks only at 237 and 255◦C [57], the authors chose the precursor as a viable candidate for low-temperature ALD studies.
Q8. Why did the ALD process not produce continuous films?
Due to apparent precursor self-decomposition on Ta, a bimodalgrowth was experienced, leading to the parallel formation of continuous films and isolated clusters.
Q9. What was the preferred diffusion barrier system for ULSI Cu interconnects?
As starting layers, 40 nm of TaN or combinations with Ta (Ta/TaN, i. e., 20 nm Ta on top of 20 nm TaN), the preferred diffusion barrier system for ULSI Cu interconnects, were sputtered onto the Si prior to the ALD processes.
Q10. Why is the stronger CVD effect seen on TaN?
the stronger CVD effects in this case are due to enhanced precursor self-decomposition caused by the metallic Ta as theoretically predicted by Machado et al. [65], [66].
Q11. Why did the ALD on Ru undergo an additional oxidative step?
This may be due to the ability of catalytic dissociation of O2 on Ru [72] toward atomic oxygen, so that Cu2O formed during ALD could undergo an additional oxidative step, either during the ALD itself or afterward as a result of air exposure.
Q12. What is the way to reduce the liner thickness of the ALD films?
For a later application in ULSI metallization systems, this could open up an opportunity to reduce the liner thickness by avoiding the Ta layer between the TaN diffusion barrier and Cu conductor, and appears encouraging also with respect to novel liner materials, such as ruthenium.
Q13. What is the effect of the increased GPC on the precursor?
While for the deposition on stoichiometric TaNup to a temperature of 135◦C only small or no temperature dependence (Fig. 11) and thus saturated growth are observed (Fig. 6), there is a considerable increase in the GPC seen at higher temperatures, resulting from beginning self-decomposition of the precursor and CVD growth modes setting in.
Q14. What is the reason for the good adhesion of the ALD films?
On both Ta and TaN as well as on Ru, the ALD films showed very good adhesion in the tape test, most likely due to the absence of fluorine in the precursor, which is in strong contrast to the typical behavior of CVD grown Cu [30]–[32].
Q15. How many cycles of ALD growth are shown in Fig. 7?
6. The growth characteristic for this process shown in Fig. 7 displays a linear behavior with increasing number of ALD cycles in the lower range, while for more than about 200 cycles, the data suggest a steeper increase.
Q16. What is the way to reduce Cu?
For this purpose, reduction methods have to be found to convert the oxidic films into metallic Cu. Experiments with isopropanol and formic acid as the reducing agents gave very promising results and will be reported in due course.
Q17. Why did the ALD on Ta occur at higher processing temperatures?
In contrast to the ALD on Ta where considerable formation of clusters was experienced, smooth films could be obtained on Ru also at the higher processing temperatures.
Q18. Why is Cu(OH)2 not present in the XPS core level spectra?
Because the Cu 2p3/2 core level signal as well as an Auger peak for CuO are not developed, the authors can further conclude that Cu(OH)2 is present in addition to Cu2O.
Q19. What is the general tendency of Cu2O formation on TaN?
XPS analyses carried out approximately 40 days after deposition as well as 100days later reveal that there is a general tendency of Cu2O formation, which is in accordance with other reports where preferably Cu(I) oxide was produced from [Cu(hfac)2] [45], [67] or [Cu(acac)2] [46] and H2O or H2O2.
Q20. Why did the films grow so poorly on TaN?
Apart from the fact that in those cases no continuous films but only isolated clusters were grown on Ta, their adhesion to the substrate was so poor that they could be wiped off the wafer quite easily.
Q21. Why is the ALD on TaN grown at higher temperatures more pronounced?
With respect to the chemical composition of the films grown under enhanced CVD conditions, one could expect metallic Cu to be present due to disproportionation of the precursor.
Q22. What is the effect of Cu(OH)2 on the surface of the ALD?
As the authors had alsoobserved such effects on sputter-deposited Cu films, angleresolved XPS analyses were carried out on the ALD samples in order to elucidate whether the Cu(OH)2 results from a surface effect or if it is present throughout the entire ALD films.
Q23. How did the ALD growth on Ru differ from the other substrates?
On all substrates investigated, nearly temperatureindependent ALD growth was observed at least up to 120◦C, as depicted by Fig. 11.