scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

DNA damage signalling guards against activated oncogenes and tumour progression.

Jiri Bartek, +2 more
- 10 Dec 2007 - 
- Vol. 26, Iss: 56, pp 7773-7779
TLDR
Recent advances in DNA damage response are highlighted, with particular emphasis on mechanistic insights, emerging issues of special conceptual significance and discussion of major remaining challenges and implications of the concept of DDR as a tumorigenesis barrier for experimental and clinical oncology.
Abstract
DNA damage response (DDR), the guardian of genomic integrity, emerges as an oncogene-inducible biological barrier against progression of cancer beyond its early stages. Recent evidence from both cell culture and animal models as well as analyses of clinical specimens show that activation of numerous oncogenes and loss of some tumour suppressors result in DNA replication stress and DNA damage that alarm the cellular DDR machinery, a multifaceted response orchestrated by the ATR-Chk1 and ATM-Chk2 kinase signalling pathways. Such activation of the DDR network leads to cellular senescence or death of oncogene-transformed cells, resulting in delay or prevention of tumorigenesis. At the same time, the ongoing chronic DDR activation creates selective pressure that eventually favours outgrowth of malignant clones with genetic or epigenetic defects in the genome maintenance machinery, such as aberrations in the ATM-Chk2-p53 cascade and other DDR components. Furthermore, the executive DDR machinery is shared by at least two anticancer barriers, as both the oncogene-induced DNA replication stress and telomere shortening impact the cell fate decisions through convergence on DNA damage signalling. In this study, we highlight recent advances in this rapidly evolving area of cancer research, with particular emphasis on mechanistic insights, emerging issues of special conceptual significance and discussion of major remaining challenges and implications of the concept of DDR as a tumorigenesis barrier for experimental and clinical oncology.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

The DNA Damage Response: Making It Safe to Play with Knives

TL;DR: This review will focus on how the DDR controls DNA repair and the phenotypic consequences of defects in these critical regulatory functions in mammals.
Journal ArticleDOI

DNA Damage, Aging, and Cancer

TL;DR: Evidence that cancer and diseases of aging are two sides of the DNAdamage problem is presented, followed by an account of the derailment of genome guardian mechanisms in cancer and of how this cancerspecific phenomenon can be exploited for treatment.
Journal ArticleDOI

Telomeres: protecting chromosomes against genome instability

TL;DR: This work has shown that the sequestration of the telomeric sequence into a protective nucleoprotein cap that masks the ends from constitutive exposure to the DNA damage response machinery reduces the risk of genome instability.
Journal ArticleDOI

Feedback between p21 and reactive oxygen production is necessary for cell senescence

TL;DR: There exists a dynamic feedback loop that is triggered by a DNA damage response (DDR) and, which after a delay of several days, locks the cell into an actively maintained state of ‘deep’ cellular senescence, and is both necessary and sufficient for the stability of growth arrest during the establishment of the senescent phenotype.
Journal ArticleDOI

A cell-based screen identifies ATR inhibitors with synthetic lethal properties for cancer-associated mutations

TL;DR: A cell-based screening strategy is described that has allowed us to identify compounds with ATR inhibitory activity in the nanomolar range that are being tested for cancer chemotherapy and are also very potent against ATM, ATR and the catalytic subunit of DNA-dependent protein kinase (DNA-PKcs).
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Targeting the DNA repair defect in BRCA mutant cells as a therapeutic strategy

TL;DR: BRCA1 or BRCA2 dysfunction unexpectedly and profoundly sensitizes cells to the inhibition of PARP enzymatic activity, resulting in chromosomal instability, cell cycle arrest and subsequent apoptosis, illustrating how different pathways cooperate to repair damage.
Journal ArticleDOI

Specific killing of BRCA2-deficient tumours with inhibitors of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase

TL;DR: It is proposed that, in the absence of PARP1, spontaneous single-strand breaks collapse replication forks and trigger homologous recombination for repair and exploited in order to kill BRCA2-deficient tumours by PARP inhibition alone.
Journal ArticleDOI

Genome maintenance mechanisms for preventing cancer

TL;DR: This review summarizes the main DNA caretaking systems and their impact on genome stability and carcinogenesis.
Journal ArticleDOI

Cellular senescence: when bad things happen to good cells

TL;DR: Understanding the causes and consequences of cellular senescence has provided novel insights into how cells react to stress, especially genotoxic stress, and how this cellular response can affect complex organismal processes such as the development of cancer and ageing.
Journal ArticleDOI

Cell-cycle checkpoints and cancer

TL;DR: All life on earth must cope with constant exposure to DNA-damaging agents such as the Sun's radiation, and how cells respond to DNA damage are critical determinants of whether that individual will develop cancer.
Related Papers (5)