scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Electron beam nanosculpting of suspended graphene sheets

TLDR
In this article, high-resolution modification of suspended multi-layer graphene sheets by controlled exposure to the focused electron beam of a transmission electron microscope was demonstrated, on timescales of a few seconds, including nanometer-scale pores, slits and gaps that are stable and do not evolve over time.
Abstract
We demonstrate high-resolution modification of suspended multi-layer graphene sheets by controlled exposure to the focused electron beam of a transmission electron microscope. We show that this technique can be used to realize, on timescales of a few seconds, a variety of features, including nanometer-scale pores, slits, and gaps that are stable and do not evolve over time. Despite the extreme thinness of the suspended graphene sheets, extensive removal of material to produce the desired feature geometries is found to not introduce long-range distortion of the suspended sheet structure.

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

$4/<+89/:?5, +449?2<'4/'$4/<+89/:?5, +449?2<'4/'
").52'82?533549").52'82?533549
+6'8:3+4:5, .?9/)9 '6+89 +6'8:3+4:5, .?9/)9

2+):854+'3'459);26:/4-5,";96+4*+*8'6.+4+".++:92+):854+'3'459);26:/4-5,";96+4*+*8'6.+4+".++:9
/).'+2/9).(+/4
$4/<+89/:?5, +449?2<'4/'
'8/0'84*/ć
$4/<+89/:?5, +449?2<'4/'
*84*/)6.?9/)9;6+44+*;
5225=:./9'4*'**/:/54'2=5819':.::698+659/:58?;6+44+*;6.?9/)9&6'6+89
 '8:5,:.+ .?9/)9533549
!+)533+4*+*/:':/54!+)533+4*+*/:':/54
/9).(+/484*/ć2+):854+'3'459);26:/4-5,";96+4*+*8'6.+4+".++:9
!+:8/+<+*,853.::698+659/:58?;6+44+*;6.?9/)9&6'6+89
";--+9:+*/:':/54
/9).(+/4'4*84*/ć2+):854(+'34'459);26:/4-5,9;96+4*+*-8'6.+4+9.++:9
662/+*
.?9/)9+::+89

B3+8/)'449:/:;:+5, .?9/)9#./9'8:/)2+3'?(+*5=425'*+*,586+8954'2;9+542?4?5:.+8;9+
8+7;/8+968/586+83/99/545,:.+';:.58'4*:.+3+8/)'449:/:;:+5, .?9/)9#.+,5225=/4-'8:/)2+'66+'8+*/4
662/+* .?9/)9+::+89
'4*3'?(+,5;4*':.::6*>*5/58-
#./96'6+8/9659:+*':").52'82?533549.::698+659/:58?;6+44+*;6.?9/)9&6'6+89
58358+/4,583':/5462+'9+)54:'):8+659/:58?65(5>;6+44+*;

2+):854+'3'459);26:/4-5,";96+4*+*8'6.+4+".++:92+):854+'3'459);26:/4-5,";96+4*+*8'6.+4+".++:9
(9:8'):(9:8'):
%+*+3549:8':+./-.8+952;:/5435*/C)':/545,9;96+4*+*3;2:/2'?+8-8'6.+4+9.++:9(?)54:8522+*
+>659;8+:5:.+,5);9+*+2+):854(+'35,':8'493/99/54+2+):8543/)859)56+%+9.5=:.'::./9
:+).4/7;+)'4(+;9+*:58+'2/@+54:/3+9)'2+95,',+=9+)54*9'<'8/+:?5,,+':;8+9/4)2;*/4-
4'453+:+89)'2+658+992/:9'4*-'69:.':'8+9:'(2+'4**545:+<52<+5<+8:/3++96/:+:.++>:8+3+
:./44+995,:.+9;96+4*+*-8'6.+4+9.++:9+>:+49/<+8+35<'25,3':+8/'2:5685*;)+:.+*+9/8+*,+':;8+
-+53+:8/+9/9,5;4*45::5/4:85*;)+254-8'4-+*/9:58:/545,:.+9;96+4*+*9.++:9:8;):;8+
/9)/62/4+9/9)/62/4+9
.?9/)'2")/+4)+9'4*':.+3':/)9A .?9/)9
533+4:9533+4:9
";--+9:+*/:':/54
/9).(+/4'4*84*/ć2+):854(+'34'459);26:/4-5,9;96+4*+*-8'6.+4+9.++:9
662/+* .?9/)9+::+89

B3+8/)'449:/:;:+5, .?9/)9#./9'8:/)2+3'?(+*5=425'*+*,586+8954'2;9+542?4?5:.+8
;9+8+7;/8+968/586+83/99/545,:.+';:.58'4*:.+3+8/)'449:/:;:+5, .?9/)9#.+,5225=/4-'8:/)2+
'66+'8+*/4
662/+* .?9/)9+::+89
'4*3'?(+,5;4*':.::6*>*5/58-
#./905;84'2'8:/)2+/9'<'/2'(2+':").52'82?533549.::698+659/:58?;6+44+*;6.?9/)9&6'6+89

Electron beam nanosculpting of suspended graphene sheets
Michael D. Fischbein and Marija Drndić
a
Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA
Received 5 August 2008; accepted 21 August 2008; published online 16 September 2008
We demonstrate high-resolution modification of suspended multilayer graphene sheets by controlled
exposure to the focused electron beam of a transmission electron microscope. We show that this
technique can be used to realize, on time scales of a few seconds, a variety of features, including
nanometer-scale pores, slits, and gaps that are stable and do not evolve over time. Despite the
extreme thinness of the suspended graphene sheets, extensive removal of material to produce the
desired feature geometries is found not to introduce long-range distortion of the suspended sheet
structure. © 2008 American Institute of Physics. DOI: 10.1063/1.2980518
Graphene, a two-dimensional carbon crystal, has been
the focus of intense research since techniques were devel-
oped to extract it from graphite in the form of multilayers
1
and single layers.
2
Graphene-based devices measured on
substrates have revealed an impressive set of exotic elec-
tronic and optical properties with promising applications.
37
Furthermore, suspended graphene has been shown to have
exceptionally high electron mobilities
8
and high strength.
9,10
Due to its single-atom thickness and the relatively low
atomic number of carbon, suspended graphene is emerging
as powerful platform for transmission electron microscopy
TEM.
1012
In addition to serving as a nearly ideal substrate
for TEM analysis,
13
it has been shown that electron-beam-
induced deposition EBID of carbon onto graphene can be
achieved with high accuracy in a TEM.
14
In this letter, we show that suspended multilayer
graphene sheets can be controllably nanosculpted with few-
nanometer precision by ablation via focused electron-beam
irradiation in a TEM at room temperature. We demonstrate
nanopores, nanobridges, and nanogaps. These examples and
other nanometer-scale patterns of arbitrary design may prove
useful in graphene-based electronic and mechanical applica-
tions. For instance, fabricating narrow constrictions in
graphene layers is of interest for electronic property
engineering.
1523
Structures made by electron-beam irradia-
tion are stable and do not evolve over time. Furthermore, we
find that extensive removal of carbon does not introduce sig-
nificant long-range distortions of the graphene sheet. Specifi-
cally, the sheets do not begin to fold, wrinkle, curl, or warp
out of the focal plane during cutting.
Graphene sheets were extracted from graphite by me-
chanical exfoliation
2
on 300 nm SiO
2
substrates coated
with 100 nm of polymethyl methacrylate PMMA and
then transferred to a 50-nm-thick suspended SiN
x
mem-
brane substrate.
24
Prior to transfer, arrays of 1
m square
holes were patterned into the SiN
x
membranes by exposing
the surface to a SF
6
reactive ion etch through a resist mask
made by electron beam lithography. In order to transfer
graphene sheets onto the SiN
x
membranes, we followed a
method used by Meyer et al.
14
for transferring graphene to
TEM-compatible holey carbon grids. After locating graphene
sheets on the PMMA surface with an optical microscope, a
drop of isopropanol is added to the surface.
A SiN
x
membrane substrate is then placed onto the drop over
a region containing graphene sheets, with its surface facing
the PMMA surface. As the isopropanol evaporates, its sur-
face tension brings the two surfaces into close contact, which
is further improved by heating at 200° C for 5 min. Fi-
nally, the PMMA is dissolved in acetone, which releases the
graphene sheets on the PMMA side and allows them to trans-
fer and stick to the SiN
x
membrane substrate.
Graphene sheets suspended over a hole in the SiN
x
membrane were identified in a TEM JEOL 2010F operating
at 200 kV. The number of graphene layers in a sheet could
often be determined by imaging the edge of a folded
region,
11
in a manner similar to counting the number of tubes
in a multiwalled nanotube. We have worked with samples
ranging in thickness roughly from 1–20 graphene layers,
though the majority of graphene sheets used in this work
were composed of approximately five layers. Using a method
described previously, arbitrary patterns were created in the
graphene sheets by increasing the TEM magnification to
800 000, condensing the imaging electron beam to its
minimum diameter, 1 nm, and moving the beam position
with the condenser deflectors.
25
To avoid EBID of carbon,
likely to occur for a spot-mode beam setting, nanosculpting
was performed with the beam at crossover in a diffusive
mode. With the beam at crossover, the current density mea-
sured on the imaging screen was 50 pA/ cm
2
which, after
accounting for magnification, corresponds to an estimated
0.3 pA/ nm
2
at the sample position. The exposure of the
graphene sheets to the beam was 1s/ nm
2
. All of the struc-
tures shown were made at room temperature.
Figures 1a1c show TEM images of a graphene sheet
before and after creating a 3.5 nm diameter nanopore by
irradiating this spot with the condensed electron beam for
5 s. We have also observed that very brief 共⬃500 ms ex-
posure of graphene sheets to the condensed electron beam
can be used to create a partial nanopore by removing a frac-
tion of the graphene layers, while leaving other layers intact.
A single nanopore is the simplest structure that can be made
by ablation, yet nanopores have proven extremely valuable
in studies of molecular translocation, DNA in particular.
26
Given that graphene is the thinnest possible membrane while
at the same time structurally robust
9
and impermeable,
27
na-
nopores in graphene sheets may be useful for achieving sig-
nificant resolution enhancement in molecular translocation
measurements. As shown in Fig. 1d, multiple nanopores
a
Electronic mail: drndic@physics.upenn.edu.
APPLIED PHYSICS LETTERS 93, 113107 2008
0003-6951/2008/9311/113107/3/$23.00 © 2008 American Institute of Physics93, 113107-1
Downloaded 11 Jan 2011 to 130.91.117.41. Redistribution subject to AIP license or copyright; see http://apl.aip.org/about/rights_and_permissions

can be made in close proximity to each other, indicating that
large arrays of closely packed nanopore arrays can be
achieved. Since the average irradiation exposure time per
nanopore is on the order of seconds, serial processing is not
prohibitively time intensive and large arrays or more compli-
cated geometries can be made quickly. Moreover, parallel
fabrication with multiple electron beams would allow for
substantial scalability.
All of the nanopores that we have made have a concen-
tric ringlike structure extending several nanometers away
from their edges. This ringlike structure, evident in Figs. 1c
and 1d, bears a close resemblance to the dark lines often
observed at the edge of a folded graphene sheet, an example
of which is shown in Fig. 1e. The orientation of a folded
graphene layers edge is locally parallel to the TEM beam
and consequently each layer in a folded graphene sheet in-
troduces a dark line along the edge of the fold,
11
similar to
what is seen at the radial edges of a multiwalled carbon
nanotube. Intensity cross sections Figs. 1f and 1g ob-
tained from the images of the folded graphene sheet Fig.
1e and nanopore Fig. 1c reveal an average spacing be-
tween dark lines of 0.38 0.02 and 0.39 0.02 nm, respec-
tively. These values are equivalent within the error intro-
duced by finite TEM resolution and are close to the interlayer
distance of highly oriented pyrolitic graphite 共⬃0.34 nm.
These observations suggest that irradiation can induce coor-
dinated interlayer bonding between freshly exposed layer
edges, leading in this case to an “inverted-onion-like” struc-
ture. Irradiation of carbon systems has been previously
shown to be capable of inducing a variety of structural
changes,
28
and our results demonstrate that graphene sheets
can provide a valuable initial system for deriving carbon
morphologies.
Figure 2a shows two parallel 6-nm-wide lines, i.e.,
regions where graphene has been removed, separated by
25 nm. Starting with these lines, additional focused irra-
diation was used to gradually increase the lines’ widths until
their separation was reduced to 5 nm, resulting in a “nano-
bridge” Figs. 2b and 2c. Although the final nanobridge
is highly crystalline Fig. 2c, the extensive exposure to
irradiation may have induced significant interlayer rebonding
and atomic restructuring within individual layers. Nano-
bridges can be cut with the TEM beam to create a gap Fig.
2d with initial size less than a nanopore diameter but
quickly increasing with continued irradiation. In the regions
near the cut, irradiation induces morphological changes of
the crystalline structure and, in particular, we observe that
cut ends close completely, similar to fullerene capping ob-
served for irradiated nanotubes.
28
Such carbon-based point
contacts and nanobridges directly connected to a larger
graphene structure may find use in mechanical and electrical
applications.
In conclusion, we have demonstrated that suspended
graphene sheets can be controllably nanosculpted with
electron-beam irradiation. The ability to introduce features
into suspended graphene sheets by electron-beam-induced
FIG. 1. Color online TEM images of a suspended graphene sheet a
before and b after a nanopore is made by electron beam ablation. c
Higher magnification image of the nanopore. d Multiple nanopores made
in close proximity to each other. e Folded edge of a graphene sheet show-
ing lines corresponding to layer number. These lines are similar to those
seen around the nanopores Scale bars are 50, 50, 2, 10, and 5 nm. f
Average of intensity cross sections taken along six different radial directions
of the nanopore in c, each starting at the edge and proceeding radially
outward. g Average of six intensity cross sections of the graphene sheet in
e, each taken perpendicular to and starting at the sheet edge.
FIG. 2. a Two 6 nm lines cut into a graphene sheet. b Electron irra-
diation is continued to create a 5 nm wide bridge. c Higher resolution of
the bridge shows clear atomic order. d Small gap opened in the nanobridge
by additional electron irradiation. We note that the cut ends are closed.
Scale bars are 20, 10, 5, 5 nm.
113107-2 M. D. Fischbein and M. Drndić Appl. Phys. Lett. 93, 113107 2008
Downloaded 11 Jan 2011 to 130.91.117.41. Redistribution subject to AIP license or copyright; see http://apl.aip.org/about/rights_and_permissions

cutting and reshaping with high spatial resolution expands
their value as TEM compatible platforms and offers a route
to fabricating graphitic structures for potential use in electri-
cal, mechanical, and molecular translocation studies.
This work has been partially supported by NSF NSF
Career Award DMR-0449533 and MRSEC DMR05-20020,
ONR YIP N000140410489, the Penn Genome Frontiers In-
stitute and a grant with the Pennsylvania Department of
Health. The Department of Health specifically disclaims re-
sponsibility for any analyses, interpretations, or conclusions.
1
Y. Zhang, J. P. Small, W. V. Pontius, and P. Kim, Appl. Phys. Lett. 86,
073104 2005.
2
K. S. Novoselov, D. Jiang, F. Schedin, T. J. Booth, V. V. Khotkevich, S. V.
Morozov, and A. K. Geim, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 102, 10451
2005.
3
A. K. Geim and K. S. Novoselov, Nat. Mater. 6, 183 2007.
4
A. H. Castro Neto, F. Guinea, N. M. R. Peres, K. S. Novoselov, and A. K.
Geim, arXiv:cond-mat/0709.1163 2007.
5
R. R. Nair, P. Blake, A. N. Grigorenko, K. S. Novoselov, T. J. Booth, T.
Stauber, N. M. R. Peres, and A. K. Geim, Science 320, 1308 2008.
6
N. Tombros, C. Jozsa, M. Popinciuc, H. T. Jonkman, and B. J. van Wees,
Nature London 448,5712007.
7
K. S. Novoselov, Z. Jiang, Y. Zhang, S. V. Morozov, H. L. Stormer, U.
Zeitler, J. C. Maan, G. S. Boebinger, P. Kim, and A. K. Geim, Science
315, 1379 2008.
8
K. I. Bolotin, K. J. Sikes, Z. Jiang, M. Klima, G. Fudenberg, J. Hone, P.
Kim, and H. L. Stormer, Solid State Commun. 146,3512008.
9
C. Lee, X. Wei, J. W. Kysar, and J. Hone, Science 321, 385 2008.
10
T. J. Booth, P. Blake, R. R. Nair, D. Jiang, E. W. Hill, U. Bangert, A.
Bleloch, M. Gass, K. S. Novoselov, M. I. Katsnelson, and A. K. Geim,
Nano Lett. 8, 2442 2008.
11
J. C. Meyer, A. K. Geim, M. I. Katsnelson, K. S. Novoselov, T. J. Booth,
and S. Roth, Nature London 446,602007.
12
J. C. Meyer, D. Kisielowski, R. Erni, M. D. Rossell, M. F. Crommie, and
A. Zettl, Nano Lett. unpublished.
13
J. C. Meyer, C. O. Girit, M. F. Crommie, and A. Zettl, Nature London
454, 319 2008.
14
J. C. Meyer, C. O. Girit, M. F. Crommie, and A. Zettl, Appl. Phys. Lett.
92, 123110 2008.
15
C. Berger, Z. Song, X. Li, X. Wu, N. Brown, C. Naud, D. Mayou, T. Li,
J. Hass, A. N. Marchenkov, E. H. Conrad, P. N. First, and W. A. de Heer,
Science 3012, 1191 2006.
16
J. S. Bunch, Y. Yaish, M. Brink, K. Bolotin, and P. L. McEuen, Nano Lett.
5, 287 2005.
17
L. A. Ponomarenko, F. Schedin, M. I. Katsnelson, R. Yang, E. W. Hill, K.
S. Novoselov, and A. K. Geim, Science 320,3562008.
18
M. Y. Han, B. Ozylmaz, Y. Zhang, and P. Kim, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98,
206805 2007.
19
C. Stampfer, J. Guttinger, F. Molitor, D. Graf, T. Ihn, and K. Ensslin,
Appl. Phys. Lett. 92, 012102 2008.
20
Z. Chen, Y.-M. Lin, M. J. Rooks, and P. Avouris, Physica E Amsterdam
40, 228 2007.
21
X. Li, X. Wang, L. Zhang, S. Lee, and H. Dai, Science 319, 1229 2008.
22
S. S. Datta, D. R. Strachan, S. M. Khamis, and A. T. Johnson, Nano Lett.
8, 1912 2008.
23
L. Tapaszto, G. Dobrik, P. Lambin, and L. P. Biro, Nat. Nanotechnol. 3,
397 2008.
24
M. D. Fischbein and M. Drndic, Appl. Phys. Lett. 88, 063116 2006.
25
M. D. Fischbein and M. Drndic, Nano Lett. 7,13292007.
26
K. Healy, B. Schiedt, and A. P. Morrison, Nanomedicine 2,8752007.
27
J. S. Bunch, S. S. Verbridge, J. S. Alden, A. M. van der Zande, J. M.
Parpia, H. G. Craighead, and P. L. McEuen, Nano Lett. 8, 1399 2008.
28
For review see, A. V. Krasheninnikov and F. Banhart, Nat. Mater. 6,723
2007 and references therein.
113107-3 M. D. Fischbein and M. Drndić Appl. Phys. Lett. 93, 113107 2008
Downloaded 11 Jan 2011 to 130.91.117.41. Redistribution subject to AIP license or copyright; see http://apl.aip.org/about/rights_and_permissions
Citations
More filters

疟原虫var基因转换速率变化导致抗原变异[英]/Paul H, Robert P, Christodoulou Z, et al//Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A

宁北芳, +1 more
TL;DR: PfPMP1)与感染红细胞、树突状组胞以及胎盘的单个或多个受体作用,在黏附及免疫逃避中起关键的作�ly.
Journal ArticleDOI

Nanopore sensors for nucleic acid analysis

TL;DR: This article reviews the use of nanopore technology in DNA sequencing, genetics and medical diagnostics and suggests that nanopore-based sensors could be competitive with other third-generation DNA sequencing technologies.
Journal ArticleDOI

Environmental applications of graphene-based nanomaterials.

TL;DR: This critical review assesses the recent developments in the use of graphene-based materials as sorbent or photocatalytic materials for environmental decontamination, as building blocks for next generation water treatment and desalination membranes, and as electrode materials for contaminant monitoring or removal.
Journal ArticleDOI

Ion and electron irradiation-induced effects in nanostructured materials

TL;DR: In this article, the authors review recent progress in the understanding of effects of irradiation on various zero-dimensional and one-dimensional nanoscale systems, such as semiconductor and metal nanoclusters and nanowires, nanotubes, and fullerenes.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

The rise of graphene

TL;DR: Owing to its unusual electronic spectrum, graphene has led to the emergence of a new paradigm of 'relativistic' condensed-matter physics, where quantum relativistic phenomena can now be mimicked and tested in table-top experiments.

疟原虫var基因转换速率变化导致抗原变异[英]/Paul H, Robert P, Christodoulou Z, et al//Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A

宁北芳, +1 more
TL;DR: PfPMP1)与感染红细胞、树突状组胞以及胎盘的单个或多个受体作用,在黏附及免疫逃避中起关键的作�ly.
Journal ArticleDOI

Measurement of the Elastic Properties and Intrinsic Strength of Monolayer Graphene

TL;DR: Graphene is established as the strongest material ever measured, and atomically perfect nanoscale materials can be mechanically tested to deformations well beyond the linear regime.
Journal ArticleDOI

Two-dimensional atomic crystals

TL;DR: By using micromechanical cleavage, a variety of 2D crystals including single layers of boron nitride, graphite, several dichalcogenides, and complex oxides are prepared and studied.
Journal ArticleDOI

Fine Structure Constant Defines Visual Transparency of Graphene

TL;DR: It is shown that the opacity of suspended graphene is defined solely by the fine structure constant, a = e2/hc � 1/137 (where c is the speed of light), the parameter that describes coupling between light and relativistic electrons and that is traditionally associated with quantum electrodynamics rather than materials science.
Related Papers (5)
Frequently Asked Questions (1)
Q1. What are the contributions in "Electron beam nanosculpting of suspended graphene sheets" ?

The authors demonstrate high-resolution modification of suspended multilayer graphene sheets by controlled exposure to the focused electron beam of a transmission electron microscope. The authors show that this technique can be used to realize, on time scales of a few seconds, a variety of features, including nanometer-scale pores, slits, and gaps that are stable and do not evolve over time. Despite the extreme thinness of the suspended graphene sheets, extensive removal of material to produce the desired feature geometries is found not to introduce long-range distortion of the suspended sheet structure.