scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessPosted Content

Not always co-creation: introducing interactional co-destruction of value in service-dominant logic

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
This study is apparently the first to have introduced the notion of value co‐destruction into the conceptual framework of S‐D logic, showing that value can be co‐destroyed through the interactions between different systems, resulting in value destruction‐through‐misuse.
Abstract
– Noting that a fundamental tenet of service‐dominant (S‐D) logic is the co‐creation of value‐in‐use, this paper aims to explore the theoretical possibility that the interactions between service systems cannot only co‐create value, but also have adverse consequences leading to actual value co‐destruction., – This conceptual paper critically reviews the dominance of value co‐creation and value‐in‐use in S‐D logic. Noting the relative lack of research in the converse possibility, the study proposes and explores the implications of value co‐destruction as a new concept which should be introduced within the framework of S‐D logic., – The study proposes a formal definition for the new proposed concept of value co‐destruction. It describes in detail the process by which it occurs, showing that value can be co‐destroyed through the interactions between different systems, resulting in value destruction‐through‐misuse. Indeed, value co‐destruction occurs when a service system accidentally or intentionally misuses resources (its own resources and/or those of another service system) by acting in an inappropriate or unexpected manner., – This paper is purely conceptual and exploratory. Empirical examination of the theoretical findings regarding value‐co‐destruction is required. Possible avenues of interest for such empirical research of value co‐destruction are suggested., – Limiting the occurrence of misuse by aligning the mutual expectations of interacting service systems should reduce the risks of value co‐destruction. Recovering from misuse should also be considered., – This study is apparently the first to have introduced the notion of value co‐destruction into the conceptual framework of S‐D logic.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Service Research Priorities in a Rapidly Changing Context

TL;DR: In this article, the authors engaged in an international and interdisciplinary research effort to identify research priorities that have the potential to advance the service field and benefit customers, organizations, and society.
Journal ArticleDOI

Co-creation and co-destruction: A practice-theory based study of interactive value formation

TL;DR: In this article, the authors studied interactive value formation at the provider-customer interface from a practice-theory perspective, and argued that interactive value creation is not only associated with value co-creation but also with value destroying.
Journal ArticleDOI

Co-production and the co-creation of value in public services: A suitable case for treatment?

TL;DR: A conceptualization of co-production that is theoretically rooted in both public management and service management theory is presented in this paper. But this conceptualization is limited to the case of public service reform.
Journal ArticleDOI

Social media engagement behaviour: a uses and gratifications perspective

TL;DR: In this article, the role of social media content in facilitating engagement behavior within a social media context is discussed. But, theoretically based guidance concerning marketing practice and engagement in new media social networks is limited.
Journal ArticleDOI

Co-production versus co-creation : a process based continuum in the hotel service context

TL;DR: In this paper, the theoretical underpinnings of co-production and co-creation are reviewed and discussed in a hotel context, and the benefits for hotels of moving from Co-production to Co-creation on this continuum are discussed.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

How can online marketplaces reduce rating manipulation? A new approach on dynamic aggregation of online ratings

TL;DR: A novel method that instead of displaying every new rating immediately, aggregates a sequence of most recent ratings to k -values, with k determined dynamically based on the distribution of the recent ratings is proposed and evaluated.
Journal ArticleDOI

A critical analysis of service ecosystems research: rethinking its premises to move forward

TL;DR: In this article, the authors examine the development of service ecosystems literature and its four premises as follows: loosely coupled systems, the existence of shared institutional arrangements among actors, the occurrence of resource-integrating interactions among actors and value co-creation.
Dissertation

‘Friction’ in cross-cultural service interactions: narratives from guests and service-providers of a five star luxury hotel

Jason Cheok
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors studied the impact of cross-cultural service interactions in international tourism and how these factors might influence the outcomes of crosscultural service interaction in international tourists' and service hosts' experiences.
Journal ArticleDOI

Pathologies and Paradoxes of Co-Creation: A Contribution to the Discussion about Corporate Social Responsibility in Building a Competitive Advantage in the Age of Industry 4.0

Anna Adamik, +1 more
- 11 Sep 2019 - 
Abstract: Research problem: Revolution Industry 4.0. forces companies to face specific competence-related, technological, organizational and even ethical challenges. The use of innovative “tools” associated with that revolution not only brings new technological challenges, opportunities to build new competitive advantages, new areas of activity, and new types of business benefits but also doubts, questions, or even pathologies and paradoxes. Sometimes, entities that do not fully understand the essence of the new concepts, methods, or techniques use them incorrectly or abuse them for private goals and expose themselves to criticism—sometimes even social condemnation. These are examples of the lack of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) of these organizations. This situation also has reached co-creation. In theory, it is a very positive concept, aimed at building competitiveness, or various types of competitive advantages of companies by creating value for clients with their participation. In economic practice, unfortunately, it is not always successful. Purpose: The main purpose of this paper is to identify and characterize the key paradoxes and areas of potential pathologies of creating competitive advantage based on co-creation without CSR in the case of companies operating in the age of Industry 4.0. Originality/value of the paper: A theoretical study based on the extensive literature review describing paradoxes, ethical and CSR problems of co-creation in organizations creating competitive advantage in the age of the Fourth Industrial Revolution and a qualitative methodology of research. This study attempts to systematize paradoxes of co-creation and the areas and industries in which the related pathologies of co-creation occur particularly often and distinctively in economic practice. The empirical studies were conducted as a review of case studies of companies that use the concept of co-creation in an irregular way (paradoxical or with pathologies). This study identified and characterized the key 31 paradoxes and pathologies of creating competitive advantage based on co-creation in the case of 14 companies operating in the age of Industry 4.0. Implications: The identification of main dilemmas, paradoxes and pathologies of co-creation; signaling the role of governance and CSR in processes of the valuable use of co-creation in the age of Industry 4.0. Based on the observations described in the paper, it is worth recommending that when becoming involved in co-creation, one should observe ethical standards and assumptions of CSR, and require the same from partners and other parties involved. Otherwise, the risk is that instead of co-creation, the result achieved will be exactly the opposite to that intended, which is co-destruction, and condemnation instead of glory. This is why it is worth considering the paradoxes that are key to co-creation and approaching solutions in a conscious way.
Journal ArticleDOI

Examining the relationship between customer bonding, customer participation, and customer satisfaction

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors empirically analyzed the relationship between customer bonding, customer participation, and customer satisfaction using data from 804 VIP customers of South Korea's commercial banks and found that social and structural bonding are the main antecedents of customer participation.
Related Papers (5)