scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Osteopontin as a Potential Diagnostic Biomarker for Ovarian Cancer

TLDR
The findings provide evidence for an association between levels of a biomarker, osteopontin, and ovarian cancer and suggest that future research assessing its clinical usefulness would be worthwhile.
Abstract
ContextDevelopment of new biomarkers for ovarian cancer is needed for early detection and disease monitoring. Analyses involving complementary DNA (cDNA) microarray data can be used to identify up-regulated genes in cancer cells, whose products may then be further validated as potential biomarkers.ObjectiveTo describe validation studies of an up-regulated gene known as osteopontin, previously identified using a cDNA microarray system.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsExperimental and cross-sectional studies were conducted involving ovarian cancer and healthy human ovarian surface epithelial cell lines and cultures, archival paraffin-embedded ovarian tissue collected between June 1992 and June 2001, and fresh tissue and preoperative plasma from 144 patients evaluated for a pelvic mass between June 1992 and June 2001 in gynecologic oncology services at 2 US academic institutions. Plasma samples from 107 women selected from an epidemiologic study of ovarian cancer initiated between May 1992 and March 1997 were used as healthy controls.Main Outcome MeasuresRelative messenger RNA expression in cancer cells and fresh ovarian tissue, measured by real-time polymerase chain reaction as 2−ΔΔCT(a quantitative value representing the amount of osteopontin expression); osteopontin production, localized and scored in ovarian healthy and tumor tissue with immunohistochemical studies; and amount of osteopontin in patient vs control plasma, measured using an enzyme-linked immunoassay.ResultsThe geometric mean for 2−ΔΔCTfor osteopontin expression in 5 healthy ovarian epithelial cell cultures was 4.1 compared with 270.4 in 14 ovarian cancer cell lines (P = .03). The geometric mean 2−ΔΔCTfor osteopontin expression in tissue from 2 healthy ovarian epithelial samples was 9.0 compared with 164.0 in 27 microdissected ovarian tumor tissue samples (P = .06). Immunolocalization of osteopontin showed that tissue samples from 61 patients with invasive ovarian cancer and 29 patients with borderline ovarian tumors expressed higher levels of osteopontin than tissue samples from 6 patients with benign tumors and samples of healthy ovarian epithelium from 3 patients (P = .03). Osteopontin levels in plasma were significantly higher (P<.001) in 51 patients with epithelial ovarian cancer (486.5 ng/mL) compared with those of 107 healthy controls (147.1 ng/mL), 46 patients with benign ovarian disease (254.4 ng/mL), and 47 patients with other gynecologic cancers (260.9 ng/mL).ConclusionsOur findings provide evidence for an association between levels of a biomarker, osteopontin, and ovarian cancer and suggest that future research assessing its clinical usefulness would be worthwhile.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Proteomic applications for the early detection of cancer.

TL;DR: Proteomic analyses of early-stage cancers have provided new insights into the changes that occur in the early phases of tumorigenesis and represent a new resource of candidate biomarkers for early stage disease as discussed by the authors.
Journal ArticleDOI

The use of multiple novel tumor biomarkers for the detection of ovarian carcinoma in patients with a pelvic mass

TL;DR: As a single tumor marker, HE4 had the highest sensitivity for detecting ovarian cancer, especially Stage I disease and combined CA125 and HE4 is a more accurate predictor of malignancy than either alone.
Journal ArticleDOI

Mass Spectrometry as a Diagnostic and a Cancer Biomarker Discovery Tool Opportunities and Potential Limitations

TL;DR: This review focuses more on questions that cast doubt on the results reported and proposes experiments to investigate these questions in detail, before the technique is used at the clinic.
Journal ArticleDOI

National Academy of Clinical Biochemistry Laboratory Medicine Practice Guidelines for Use of Tumor Markers in Testicular, Prostate, Colorectal, Breast, and Ovarian Cancers

TL;DR: Recommendations to encourage optimal use of tumor markers for 5 cancer sites were critically reviewed and alpha-fetoprotein, human chorionic gonadotropin, and lactate dehydrogenase are recommended for diagnosis/case finding, staging, prognosis determination, recurrence detection, and therapy monitoring.
Journal ArticleDOI

Clinical proteomics: translating benchside promise into bedside reality

TL;DR: Proteomic technologies that are being developed to detect cancer earlier, to discover the next generation of targets and imaging biomarkers, and finally to tailor the therapy to the patient are described.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Real time quantitative PCR.

TL;DR: Unlike other quantitative PCR methods, real-time PCR does not require post-PCR sample handling, preventing potential PCR product carry-over contamination and resulting in much faster and higher throughput assays.
Journal ArticleDOI

Tissue microarrays for high-throughput molecular profiling of tumor specimens

TL;DR: In this paper, an array-based high-throughput technique that facilitates gene expression and copy number surveys of very large numbers of tumors is presented. But, it is limited to a single tumor tissue microarray.
Journal ArticleDOI

Cancer statistics, 2000.

TL;DR: The Surveillance Research Program of the American Cancer Society's Department of Epidemiology and Surveillance Research reports its annual compilation of estimated cancer incidence, mortality, and survival data for the United States in the year 2000.
Journal ArticleDOI

Cancer statistics, 1999.

TL;DR: The Surveillance Research Program of the American Cancer Society's Department of Epidemiology and Surveillance Research reports its 33rd annual compilation of cancer frequency, incidence, mortality, and survival data for the United States.
Journal ArticleDOI

Real-time quantitative PCR.

Thomas D. Schmittgen
- 01 Dec 2001 - 
TL;DR: Benefits of real-time PCR include enhanced sensitivity, high throughput, use of a closed-tube system, reduced variation, the ability to simultaneously multiplex reactions, and lack of post-PCR manipulations.
Related Papers (5)