scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

Risk as feelings.

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
This article proposed the risk-as-feelings hypothesis, which highlights the role of affect experienced at the moment of decision making, and showed that emotional reactions to risky situations often diverge from cognitive assessments of those risks.
Abstract
Virtually all current theories of choice under risk or uncertainty are cognitive and consequentialist. They assume that people assess the desirability and likelihood of possible outcomes of choice alternatives and integrate this information through some type of expectation-based calculus to arrive at a decision. The authors propose an alternative theoretical perspective, the risk-as-feelings hypothesis, that highlights the role of affect experienced at the moment of decision making. Drawing on research from clinical, physiological, and other subfields of psychology, they show that emotional reactions to risky situations often diverge from cognitive assessments of those risks. When such divergence occurs, emotional reactions often drive behavior. The risk-as-feelings hypothesis is shown to explain a wide range of phenomena that have resisted interpretation in cognitive-consequentialist terms.

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Fair play in energy policy decisions: Procedural fairness, outcome fairness and acceptance of the decision to rebuild nuclear power plants

TL;DR: In this article, the authors examined the influence of procedural fairness and outcome fairness on the acceptance of this decision, as well as other factors such as risk perception and benefit perception, and investigated the moderating influence of general attitudes towards nuclear power on the relation between fairness and decision acceptance.
Journal ArticleDOI

A model of procedural and distributive fairness

TL;DR: In this article, a new model aimed at predicting behavior in games involving a randomized allocation procedure is presented, which is designed to capture the relative importance and interaction between procedural justice and distributive justice, defined crudely in terms of the difference between one's expected payoff and average expected payoff in the group.
Journal ArticleDOI

Backpackers and mainstreamers: Realities and Myths

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors address the issue of the budget traveler (backpacker) as compared to mainstream tourists, highlighting travel motivations, subjective judgments of risk, tourist worries and tourists' self identifications.
Journal ArticleDOI

Examining the willingness of Americans to alter behaviour to mitigate climate change

TL;DR: In this article, the degree to which residents living in the US are willing to alter their behaviour to mitigate climate change impacts, and identifying the major factors contributing to this willingness are investigated.
Journal ArticleDOI

Feelings of the future.

TL;DR: The function of affective forecasts is considered as signals of biological value, drivers of goal pursuit, and tools for eliciting collaboration, which may ultimately serve adaptive functions.
References
More filters
Book ChapterDOI

Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors present a critique of expected utility theory as a descriptive model of decision making under risk, and develop an alternative model, called prospect theory, in which value is assigned to gains and losses rather than to final assets and in which probabilities are replaced by decision weights.
Book

Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior

TL;DR: In this paper, the author explains "theory and reasoned action" model and then applies the model to various cases in attitude courses, such as self-defense and self-care.
Book

Handbook of social psychology

TL;DR: In this paper, Neuberg and Heine discuss the notion of belonging, acceptance, belonging, and belonging in the social world, and discuss the relationship between friendship, membership, status, power, and subordination.
Book

Descartes' Error: Emotion, Reason, and the Human Brain

TL;DR: The authors argued that rational decisions are not the product of logic alone - they require the support of emotion and feeling, drawing on his experience with neurological patients affected with brain damage, Dr Damasio showed how absence of emotions and feelings can break down rationality.