scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

Risk as feelings.

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
This article proposed the risk-as-feelings hypothesis, which highlights the role of affect experienced at the moment of decision making, and showed that emotional reactions to risky situations often diverge from cognitive assessments of those risks.
Abstract
Virtually all current theories of choice under risk or uncertainty are cognitive and consequentialist. They assume that people assess the desirability and likelihood of possible outcomes of choice alternatives and integrate this information through some type of expectation-based calculus to arrive at a decision. The authors propose an alternative theoretical perspective, the risk-as-feelings hypothesis, that highlights the role of affect experienced at the moment of decision making. Drawing on research from clinical, physiological, and other subfields of psychology, they show that emotional reactions to risky situations often diverge from cognitive assessments of those risks. When such divergence occurs, emotional reactions often drive behavior. The risk-as-feelings hypothesis is shown to explain a wide range of phenomena that have resisted interpretation in cognitive-consequentialist terms.

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Agreed but not preferred: expert views on taboo options for biodiversity conservation, given climate change.

TL;DR: It is argued that expert views are converging on agreement across a set of taboo components in ways that differ from earlier published positions, and that these views are tempered by preferences for existing conventional actions and discomfort toward interventionist options.
Journal ArticleDOI

Positioning terrorism in management and marketing: Research propositions

TL;DR: In this article, the pivotal roles of sourcing, production, distribution, pricing, communications, and general business strategy as functions influenced by, or capable of influencing, terrorism are highlighted.
Journal ArticleDOI

The Relative State Model: Integrating Need-Based and Ability-Based Pathways to Risk-Taking

TL;DR: A conceptual model of decision-making under risk—the relative state model—is provided that integrates both pathways and explicates how situational and embodied factors influence the estimated costs and benefits of risk-taking in different contexts.
Journal ArticleDOI

Intuition and Emotion in Bank Loan Officers' Credit Decisions

TL;DR: Within the framework of judgment and decision making (JDM), considerable progress has been made in research on how intuitions and emotions affect decision making as mentioned in this paper, and much of this research has been con
Book ChapterDOI

An Emotion-Based View of Strategic Renewal

TL;DR: In this article, the authors discuss how appropriate emotion management can increase the ability of organizations to realize continuous or radical change to exploit the shifting conditions of their environments, such as receptivity to change, sharing of knowledge, collective action, creativity, and retention of key personnel.
References
More filters
Book ChapterDOI

Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors present a critique of expected utility theory as a descriptive model of decision making under risk, and develop an alternative model, called prospect theory, in which value is assigned to gains and losses rather than to final assets and in which probabilities are replaced by decision weights.
Book

Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior

TL;DR: In this paper, the author explains "theory and reasoned action" model and then applies the model to various cases in attitude courses, such as self-defense and self-care.
Book

Handbook of social psychology

TL;DR: In this paper, Neuberg and Heine discuss the notion of belonging, acceptance, belonging, and belonging in the social world, and discuss the relationship between friendship, membership, status, power, and subordination.
Book

Descartes' Error: Emotion, Reason, and the Human Brain

TL;DR: The authors argued that rational decisions are not the product of logic alone - they require the support of emotion and feeling, drawing on his experience with neurological patients affected with brain damage, Dr Damasio showed how absence of emotions and feelings can break down rationality.