scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

Risk as feelings.

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
This article proposed the risk-as-feelings hypothesis, which highlights the role of affect experienced at the moment of decision making, and showed that emotional reactions to risky situations often diverge from cognitive assessments of those risks.
Abstract
Virtually all current theories of choice under risk or uncertainty are cognitive and consequentialist. They assume that people assess the desirability and likelihood of possible outcomes of choice alternatives and integrate this information through some type of expectation-based calculus to arrive at a decision. The authors propose an alternative theoretical perspective, the risk-as-feelings hypothesis, that highlights the role of affect experienced at the moment of decision making. Drawing on research from clinical, physiological, and other subfields of psychology, they show that emotional reactions to risky situations often diverge from cognitive assessments of those risks. When such divergence occurs, emotional reactions often drive behavior. The risk-as-feelings hypothesis is shown to explain a wide range of phenomena that have resisted interpretation in cognitive-consequentialist terms.

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

A Biosocial-Affect Model of Adolescent Sensation Seeking: The Role of Affect Evaluation and Peer-Group Influence in Adolescent Drug Use

TL;DR: The findings indicate that although adolescents recognize the risks of drug use, they are subject to both biological and social influences that encourage risk taking.
Journal ArticleDOI

The Functions of Affect in Health Communications and in the Construction of Health Preferences.

TL;DR: It is demonstrated that experienced affect influences information processes, judgments, and decisions in the area of cancer screening and treatment decision making.
Journal ArticleDOI

When risk seeking becomes a motivational necessity.

TL;DR: The authors discuss the benefits of complementing existing accounts of risky decision making under loss with regulatory focus motivational mechanisms and demonstrate the importance of self-regulatory mechanisms for understanding risk-seeking behavior under loss.
Journal ArticleDOI

Losses as Modulators of Attention: Review and Analysis of the Unique Effects of Losses over Gains.

TL;DR: It is shown that as predicted by the attentional model, asymmetric effects of losses on behavior emerge where gains and losses are presented separately but not concurrently, yet, even in the absence of loss aversion, losses have distinct effects on performance, arousal, frontal cortical activation, and behavioral consistency.
Journal ArticleDOI

Insights from socio-hydrology modelling on dealing with flood risk – Roles of collective memory, risk-taking attitude and trust

TL;DR: In this article, the authors analyzed the interplay of community risk coping culture, flooding damage and economic growth in urban floodplains, focusing on three aspects: (i) collective memory, (ii) risk-taking attitude, and (iii) trust of the community in risk reduction measures.
References
More filters
Book ChapterDOI

Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors present a critique of expected utility theory as a descriptive model of decision making under risk, and develop an alternative model, called prospect theory, in which value is assigned to gains and losses rather than to final assets and in which probabilities are replaced by decision weights.
Book

Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior

TL;DR: In this paper, the author explains "theory and reasoned action" model and then applies the model to various cases in attitude courses, such as self-defense and self-care.
Book

Handbook of social psychology

TL;DR: In this paper, Neuberg and Heine discuss the notion of belonging, acceptance, belonging, and belonging in the social world, and discuss the relationship between friendship, membership, status, power, and subordination.
Book

Descartes' Error: Emotion, Reason, and the Human Brain

TL;DR: The authors argued that rational decisions are not the product of logic alone - they require the support of emotion and feeling, drawing on his experience with neurological patients affected with brain damage, Dr Damasio showed how absence of emotions and feelings can break down rationality.