Two-dimensional defect mapping of the SiO 2 /4 H −SiC interface
read more
Citations
Physical Modeling of Charge Trapping in 4H-SiC DMOSFET Technologies
Interfacial electrical and chemical properties of deposited SiO2 layers in lateral implanted 4H-SiC MOSFETs subjected to different nitridations
Optically Active Defects at the Si C / Si O 2 Interface
References
Room temperature coherent control of defect spin qubits in silicon carbide
Fundamentals of Silicon Carbide Technology: Growth, Characterization, Devices and Applications
Coherent control of single spins in silicon carbide at room temperature
A room temperature single photon source in silicon carbide
Coherent control of single spins in silicon carbide at room temperature
Related Papers (5)
A Novel Intrinsic Interface State Controlled by Atomic Stacking Sequence at Interfaces of SiC/SiO2.
SiC SURFACE RECONSTRUCTION: RELEVANCY OF ATOMIC STRUCTURE FOR GROWTH TECHNOLOGY
Frequently Asked Questions (15)
Q2. What are the future works in "Two-dimensional defect mapping of the sio 2 / 4 h – sic interface" ?
Further information on the National Research Programme can be found at www. H. Yoshioka, T. Nakamura, and T. Kimoto, Accurate evaluation of interface state density in SiC metal-oxide-semiconductor structures using surface potential based on depletion capacitance, J. Appl. Phys. 111, 014502 ( 2012 ). [ 31 ] 3. 084602 for additional AFM and EELS profiles as well as further details on the capacitancevoltage and DLTS analysis.
Q3. What was the energy depth of the interface traps?
Assuming a capture cross section of the interface traps of σS = 4 × 10−16 cm2 (obtained from standard-DLTS measurements), an energy depth of 0.38 eV below the conduction band was probed.
Q4. What is the EELS profile of a SiC terrace?
In order to correlate the observed thickness variations of the transition region with the density of interface defects, a mapping of the SiO2/SiC interface was performed using confocal PL measurements.
Q5. How many facets have strong step bunching?
While the riser facets with strong step bunching exhibit Dit values up to 1 × 1014 cm−2eV−1, the flat terrace regions in Fig. 6(b) have average defect densities of 4 × 1013 cm−2eV−1.
Q6. What is the EELS profile of a flat SiC terrace?
For a flat SiC terrace where a few single steps are present [Fig. 3(b)], the drop of the SiOxCy signal moves away from the interface, which is interpreted as an increased contribution of an only partially oxidized SiC plane containing some residual Si, C, and O bonds.
Q7. What is the energy range of the EELS?
By choosing this energy range, fully oxidized Si+4 atoms at energies above 104 eV do not contribute to the EELS signal and the profile quickly decreases in the SiO2 bulk where all Si atoms are surrounded by oxygen.
Q8. What was the atomic orientation of the samples?
For this study, 10 mm × 10 mm samples of a Wolfspeed (0001) 4H-C wafer with a 4◦ off-axis orientation towards the 〈112̄0〉 direction were used.
Q9. What was the radius of the Pt-coated probing tip?
The radius of the Pt-coated probing tip forming a capacitor with the SiO2/SiC stack was 150 nm and the scan size was 1 μm × 1 μm.
Q10. What is the EELS profile of the SiO2 bilayer?
the SiOxCy signal extends more than 1 nm into the SiO2 bulk, suggesting an increased thickness of the transition layer and a larger contribution of a substoichiometric SiOxCy region.
Q11. What are the two types of facets on the untreated surface?
Similarly to the isolated macrosteps on the untreated surface, they are composed of two types of facets: step-free terraces and step-bunched risers, as depicted in Fig. 2(d).
Q12. What is the EELS spectrum of the flat terraces?
Flat terraces, depicted in Fig. 3(a), exhibit a complete last SiC bilayer stacking without any observable steps in the DFimage and a very good overlap of the C and SiOxCy signals in the EELS spectrum.
Q13. What was the Bruker Dimension 3100 AFM?
AFM analysis was conducted with either a Bruker MultiMode 8 AFM or a Bruker Dimension 3100 AFM in tapping mode with a tapping frequency of 150 kHz.
Q14. What was the exposure time for all PL spectra?
The exposure time for all PL spectra was 50 s.Local-DLTS measurements were performed using a commercial contact-mode AFM (Bruker Icon) with a home-built scanning nonlinear dielectric microscopy (SNDM) probe oscillating at a frequency of 1 GHz [see Fig. 6(a)] [25,26].
Q15. How much Dit is greater than the terrace regions?
On the sample where no Si-melt process was performed, the average Dit value is 5 × 1013 cm−2eV−1 which is slightly greater compared to the terrace regions.