Frank A. Bosco

TL;DR: A large-scale assessment suggests that experimental reproducibility in psychology leaves a lot to be desired, and correlational tests suggest that replication success was better predicted by the strength of original evidence than by characteristics of the original and replication teams.

TL;DR: This study extracted 147,328 correlations and developed a hierarchical taxonomy of variables reported in Journal of Applied Psychology and Personnel Psychology from 1980 to 2010 to produce empirical effect size benchmarks at the omnibus level, for 20 common research domains, and for an even finer grained level of generality.

TL;DR: This paper conducted a meta-analytic review in which they test and provide support for a portion of Hausknecht and Trevor's model of collective turnover and found that the mean corrected correlation between turnover and organizational performance is −.03.

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors analyzed 196 meta-analyses including 5,581 effect-size estimates published in Academy of Management Journal, Journal of Applied Psychology and Journal of Management, Personnel Psychology and Strategic Management Journal from January 1982 through August 2009 to assess the presumed effects of each of 21 methodological choices and judgment calls on substantive conclusions.

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors discuss seven meta-analytic practices, misconceptions, claims, and assumptions that have reached the status of myths and urban legends (MULs), including issues related to data collection, consequences of choices made in the process of gathering primary-level studies to be included in a meta-analysis, data analysis, and interpretation of results.