scispace - formally typeset
M

Michael Taborsky

Researcher at University of Bern

Publications -  227
Citations -  14843

Michael Taborsky is an academic researcher from University of Bern. The author has contributed to research in topics: Neolamprologus pulcher & Cooperative breeding. The author has an hindex of 63, co-authored 218 publications receiving 13523 citations. Previous affiliations of Michael Taborsky include Universidad Iberoamericana (UNIBE) & Max Planck Society.

Papers
More filters
Book ChapterDOI

Sneakers, Satellites, and Helpers: Parasitic and Cooperative Behavior in Fish Reproduction

TL;DR: This chapter reviews the current knowledge of the ways in which fish compete at different levels of sexual reproduction and describes how competition for resources may lead to cooperative behavior, even between the competitors themselves.
Journal ArticleDOI

Sperm competition in fish: `bourgeois' males and parasitic spawning

TL;DR: Recent theoretical, empirical and comparative evidence suggests that adaptations to sperm competition in fish might be responsible for some of the most intriguing examples of reproductive design known.
Book

Alternative Reproductive Tactics: An Integrative Approach

TL;DR: The evolution of alternative mating tactics: concepts and questions Michael Taborsky, Rui F. Oliveira and H. Jane Brockmann examine the role of genes and the environment in the expression and evolution ofAlternative reproductive tactics.
Journal ArticleDOI

Animal personality due to social niche specialisation

TL;DR: How animal personality research might benefit from insights into the study of alternative tactics and how selection can favour behavioural diversification and consistency due to fitness benefits resulting from conflict reduction among social partners are discussed.
Journal ArticleDOI

Inclusive fitness theory and eusociality

Patrick Abbot, +137 more
- 24 Mar 2011 - 
TL;DR: It is argued that inclusive fitness theory has been of little value in explained the natural world, and that it has led to negligible progress in explaining the evolution of eusociality, but these arguments are based upon a misunderstanding of evolutionary theory and a misrepresentation of the empirical literature.