scispace - formally typeset
P

Peter M. Rothwell

Researcher at University of Oxford

Publications -  815
Citations -  77220

Peter M. Rothwell is an academic researcher from University of Oxford. The author has contributed to research in topics: Stroke & Population. The author has an hindex of 134, co-authored 779 publications receiving 67382 citations. Previous affiliations of Peter M. Rothwell include Leicester Royal Infirmary & University of Edinburgh.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Underestimation of Cognitive Impairment by Mini-Mental State Examination Versus the Montreal Cognitive Assessment in Patients With Transient Ischemic Attack and Stroke A Population-Based Study

TL;DR: The MoCA picked up substantially more cognitive abnormalities after transient ischemic attack and stroke than the Mini-Mental State Examination, demonstrating deficits in executive function, attention, and delayed recall.
Journal ArticleDOI

Genetic risk factors for ischaemic stroke and its subtypes (the METASTROKE collaboration): a meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies.

Matthew Traylor, +91 more
- 01 Nov 2012 - 
TL;DR: The results show that, although genetic variants can be detected in patients with ischaemic stroke when compared with controls, all associations validated are specific to a stroke subtype, and this finding has two implications.
Journal ArticleDOI

Assessing and reporting heterogeneity in treatment effects in clinical trials: a proposal

TL;DR: This work proposes a framework that prioritizes the analysis and reporting of multivariate risk-based HTE and suggests that other subgroup analyses should be explicitly labeled either as primary sub group analyses (well-motivated by prior evidence and intended to produce clinically actionable results) or secondary (exploratory) subgroups analyses (performed to inform future research).
Journal ArticleDOI

Global Stroke Statistics

TL;DR: This work aims to provide a repository of the most current incidence and mortality data on stroke available by country and illustrate the gaps in these data to promote discussion and provide insights into the worldwide burden of stroke.
Journal ArticleDOI

Reanalysis of the Final Results of the European Carotid Surgery Trial

TL;DR: Results of the ECST and NASCET were consistent when analyzed in the same way, and contrary to clinical recommendations and current practice, surgery was of little benefit in patients with carotid near occlusion.