scispace - formally typeset
R

Richard H. G. Field

Researcher at University of Alberta

Publications -  36
Citations -  2304

Richard H. G. Field is an academic researcher from University of Alberta. The author has contributed to research in topics: Normative model of decision-making & Vroom–Yetton decision model. The author has an hindex of 16, co-authored 36 publications receiving 2220 citations. Previous affiliations of Richard H. G. Field include Claremont Graduate University & Simon Fraser University.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Culture specific and cross-culturally generalizable implicit leadership theories: Are attributes of charismatic/transformational leadership universally endorsed?

Deanne N. Den Hartog, +143 more
- 01 Jun 1999 - 
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors focus on culturally endorsed implicit theories of leadership (CLTs) and show that attributes associated with charismatic/transformational leadership will be universally endorsed as contributing to outstanding leadership.
Journal ArticleDOI

The Evolution of Leadership Theory

TL;DR: In this article, an evolutionary developmental perspective is used to create an evolutionary tree of leadership theory and reveal the path along which it has evolved, and nine evolutionary eras are identified, and requirements for a tenth era of leadership theories are discussed.
Posted Content

Climate: A Reconceptualization and Proposed Model

TL;DR: The climate construct is defined and key issues concerning climate, which have been identified by past research, are addressed and a model which represents the traditional conceptualization of climate is given.
Journal ArticleDOI

Constructive controversy, the Vroom-Yetton model, and managerial decision-making

TL;DR: The authors found that constructive controversy accounts for 45 per cent of variance of decision success whereas the Vroom-Yetton model accounted for 5 per cent, and that the contribution is provided by constructive discussions of opposing opinions when actually generating the decision.
Posted Content

Effects of Social Context on Consensus and Majority Vote Decision Making

TL;DR: This paper found that social context (competitive or cooperative) and decision strategy (consensus or majority voting) affected decision acceptance, understanding, decision time, and affective reactions to the group, although decision quality was not affected.