scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

Queen's University Belfast

EducationBelfast, United Kingdom
About: Queen's University Belfast is a education organization based out in Belfast, United Kingdom. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Context (language use). The organization has 25457 authors who have published 55463 publications receiving 1751346 citations. The organization is also known as: Queen's College, Belfast & Queen's College.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Some of the recent findings on resistance mechanisms are summarized, some recommendations for limiting its impact are put forward and some priorities for research in this area are suggested.

799 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
08 Sep 2005-Polymer
TL;DR: In this article, the electrical conductivity and linear viscoelastic behavior of polyethylene (PE) multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) with weight fractions ranging from 0.1 to 10 wt% were prepared by melt blending using a mini-twin screw extruder.

796 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This review focuses on the monophyletic group of animal RNA viruses united in the order Nidovirales, which includes the largest known RNA genomes and will therefore be called ‘large’ nidoviruses in this review.

796 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Radiotherapy to the prostate did not improve overall survival for unselected patients with newly diagnosed metastatic prostate cancer, and the benefit would be greatest in patients with a low metastatic burden.

794 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The purpose of this review was to update existing knowledge of "How many steps/day are enough?", and to inform step-based recommendations consistent with current physical activity guidelines.
Abstract: Physical activity guidelines from around the world are typically expressed in terms of frequency, duration, and intensity parameters. Objective monitoring using pedometers and accelerometers offers a new opportunity to measure and communicate physical activity in terms of steps/day. Various step-based versions or translations of physical activity guidelines are emerging, reflecting public interest in such guidance. However, there appears to be a wide discrepancy in the exact values that are being communicated. It makes sense that step-based recommendations should be harmonious with existing evidence-based public health guidelines that recognize that "some physical activity is better than none" while maintaining a focus on time spent in moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA). Thus, the purpose of this review was to update our existing knowledge of "How many steps/day are enough?", and to inform step-based recommendations consistent with current physical activity guidelines. Normative data indicate that healthy adults typically take between 4,000 and 18,000 steps/day, and that 10,000 steps/day is reasonable for this population, although there are notable "low active populations." Interventions demonstrate incremental increases on the order of 2,000-2,500 steps/day. The results of seven different controlled studies demonstrate that there is a strong relationship between cadence and intensity. Further, despite some inter-individual variation, 100 steps/minute represents a reasonable floor value indicative of moderate intensity walking. Multiplying this cadence by 30 minutes (i.e., typical of a daily recommendation) produces a minimum of 3,000 steps that is best used as a heuristic (i.e., guiding) value, but these steps must be taken over and above habitual activity levels to be a true expression of free-living steps/day that also includes recommendations for minimal amounts of time in MVPA. Computed steps/day translations of time in MVPA that also include estimates of habitual activity levels equate to 7,100 to 11,000 steps/day. A direct estimate of minimal amounts of MVPA accumulated in the course of objectively monitored free-living behaviour is 7,000-8,000 steps/day. A scale that spans a wide range of incremental increases in steps/day and is congruent with public health recognition that "some physical activity is better than none," yet still incorporates step-based translations of recommended amounts of time in MVPA may be useful in research and practice. The full range of users (researchers to practitioners to the general public) of objective monitoring instruments that provide step-based outputs require good reference data and evidence-based recommendations to be able to design effective health messages congruent with public health physical activity guidelines, guide behaviour change, and ultimately measure, track, and interpret steps/day.

792 citations


Authors

Showing all 25808 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
George Davey Smith2242540248373
David J. Hunter2131836207050
Grant W. Montgomery157926108118
Caroline S. Fox155599138951
Debbie A Lawlor1471114101123
Markus Ackermann14661071071
Hermann Kolanoski145127996152
Paul Jackson141137293464
Alan Ashworth13457872089
Conor Henderson133138788725
David Smith1292184100917
Stuart J. Connolly12561075925
G. Merino12368766163
Richard J.H. Smith118130861779
Yong-Guan Zhu11568446973
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
University of Manchester
168K papers, 6.4M citations

96% related

University College London
210.6K papers, 9.8M citations

95% related

University of Edinburgh
151.6K papers, 6.6M citations

95% related

University of Cambridge
282.2K papers, 14.4M citations

94% related

Imperial College London
209.1K papers, 9.3M citations

94% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
2023140
2022493
20213,360
20203,192
20192,769
20182,448