Institution
Queen's University Belfast
Education•Belfast, United Kingdom•
About: Queen's University Belfast is a education organization based out in Belfast, United Kingdom. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Context (language use). The organization has 25457 authors who have published 55463 publications receiving 1751346 citations. The organization is also known as: Queen's College, Belfast & Queen's College.
Topics: Population, Context (language use), Laser, Catalysis, Ionic liquid
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
••
TL;DR: Women who had previously given birth to one or more infants with a neural-tube defect were recruited into a trial of periconceptional multivitamin supplementation and found no difference in the number of infants/fetuses with an NTD.
560 citations
••
27 Jun 2016TL;DR: A novel recurrent neural network architecture for video-based person re-identification that makes use of colour and optical flow information in order to capture appearance and motion information which is useful for video re- identification.
Abstract: In this paper we propose a novel recurrent neural network architecture for video-based person re-identification. Given the video sequence of a person, features are extracted from each frame using a convolutional neural network that incorporates a recurrent final layer, which allows information to flow between time-steps. The features from all timesteps are then combined using temporal pooling to give an overall appearance feature for the complete sequence. The convolutional network, recurrent layer, and temporal pooling layer, are jointly trained to act as a feature extractor for video-based re-identification using a Siamese network architecture. Our approach makes use of colour and optical flow information in order to capture appearance and motion information which is useful for video re-identification. Experiments are conduced on the iLIDS-VID and PRID-2011 datasets to show that this approach outperforms existing methods of video-based re-identification.
559 citations
••
International Agency for Research on Cancer1, University of Leicester2, Karolinska Institutet3, Cancer Institute of New South Wales4, Cancer Council Victoria5, Alberta Health Services6, St. John's University7, Nova Scotia Health Authority8, Cancer Care Ontario9, McGill University10, Public Health England11, Queen's University Belfast12, Cardiff University13, Canadian Partnership Against Cancer14, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust15, University of Oxford16, King's College London17
TL;DR: Progress in cancer control over the study period was evident for stomach, colon, lung (in males), and ovarian cancer, and the impact of comorbidity are likely the main determinants of patient outcomes.
Abstract: Summary Background Population-based cancer survival estimates provide valuable insights into the effectiveness of cancer services and can reflect the prospects of cure. As part of the second phase of the International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership (ICBP), the Cancer Survival in High-Income Countries (SURVMARK-2) project aims to provide a comprehensive overview of cancer survival across seven high-income countries and a comparative assessment of corresponding incidence and mortality trends. Methods In this longitudinal, population-based study, we collected patient-level data on 3·9 million patients with cancer from population-based cancer registries in 21 jurisdictions in seven countries (Australia, Canada, Denmark, Ireland, New Zealand, Norway, and the UK) for seven sites of cancer (oesophagus, stomach, colon, rectum, pancreas, lung, and ovary) diagnosed between 1995 and 2014, and followed up until Dec 31, 2015. We calculated age-standardised net survival at 1 year and 5 years after diagnosis by site, age group, and period of diagnosis. We mapped changes in incidence and mortality to changes in survival to assess progress in cancer control. Findings In 19 eligible jurisdictions, 3 764 543 cases of cancer were eligible for inclusion in the study. In the 19 included jurisdictions, over 1995–2014, 1-year and 5-year net survival increased in each country across almost all cancer types, with, for example, 5-year rectal cancer survival increasing more than 13 percentage points in Denmark, Ireland, and the UK. For 2010–14, survival was generally higher in Australia, Canada, and Norway than in New Zealand, Denmark, Ireland, and the UK. Over the study period, larger survival improvements were observed for patients younger than 75 years at diagnosis than those aged 75 years and older, and notably for cancers with a poor prognosis (ie, oesophagus, stomach, pancreas, and lung). Progress in cancer control (ie, increased survival, decreased mortality and incidence) over the study period was evident for stomach, colon, lung (in males), and ovarian cancer. Interpretation The joint evaluation of trends in incidence, mortality, and survival indicated progress in four of the seven studied cancers. Cancer survival continues to increase across high-income countries; however, international disparities persist. While truly valid comparisons require differences in registration practice, classification, and coding to be minimal, stage of disease at diagnosis, timely access to effective treatment, and the extent of comorbidity are likely the main determinants of patient outcomes. Future studies are needed to assess the impact of these factors to further our understanding of international disparities in cancer survival. Funding Canadian Partnership Against Cancer; Cancer Council Victoria; Cancer Institute New South Wales; Cancer Research UK; Danish Cancer Society; National Cancer Registry Ireland; The Cancer Society of New Zealand; National Health Service England; Norwegian Cancer Society; Public Health Agency Northern Ireland, on behalf of the Northern Ireland Cancer Registry; The Scottish Government; Western Australia Department of Health; and Wales Cancer Network.
555 citations
••
Centre national de la recherche scientifique1, Pasteur Institute2, University of Milan3, Queen's University Belfast4, Palacký University, Olomouc5, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia6, Schrödinger7, Forschungszentrum Jülich8, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne9, Nankai University10, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign11, Pawsey Supercomputing Centre12, University of California, Davis13, Moscow State University14, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai15, University of California, San Francisco16, Thomas Young Centre17, University of Cambridge18, New York University19, University of Zurich20, ETH Zurich21, University of Lugano22, Imperial College London23, Technische Universität München24, International Centre for Theoretical Physics25, University of Naples Federico II26, Max Planck Society27, University of Rochester28
TL;DR: These efforts to promote transparency and reproducibility by disseminating protocols for enhanced-sampling molecular simulations are outlined.
Abstract: The PLUMED consortium unifies developers and contributors to PLUMED, an open-source library for enhanced- sampling, free-energy calculations and the analysis of molecular dynamics simulations. Here, we outline
our efforts to promote transparency and reproducibility by disseminating protocols for enhanced-sampling molecular simulations.
552 citations
••
ETH Zurich1, University of California, Davis2, Bielefeld University3, Nanyang Technological University4, Wageningen University and Research Centre5, Brigham Young University6, Aligarh Muslim University7, Colorado State University8, University of Manchester9, University of Cologne10, University of La Rioja11, University of Brasília12, Queen's University Belfast13, Nanjing Agricultural University14, University of Minho15, Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária16, Zealand Institute of Business and Technology17, Spanish National Research Council18, Scotland's Rural College19, American Museum of Natural History20, Russian Academy of Sciences21, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences22, University of Göttingen23, Chinese Academy of Sciences24, University of Catania25, University of Nebraska–Lincoln26, James Hutton Institute27, Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology28, University of Sydney29, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences30, Universidade Federal de Lavras31, University of Helsinki32, University of Montpellier33, Aarhus University34, Lancaster University35, National Taiwan University36
TL;DR: High-resolution spatial maps of the global abundance of soil nematodes and the composition of functional groups show that soil nematode are found in higher abundances in sub-Arctic regions, than in temperate or tropical regions.
Abstract: Soil organisms are a crucial part of the terrestrial biosphere. Despite their importance for ecosystem functioning, few quantitative, spatially explicit models of the active belowground community currently exist. In particular, nematodes are the most abundant animals on Earth, filling all trophic levels in the soil food web. Here we use 6,759 georeferenced samples to generate a mechanistic understanding of the patterns of the global abundance of nematodes in the soil and the composition of their functional groups. The resulting maps show that 4.4 ± 0.64 × 1020 nematodes (with a total biomass of approximately 0.3 gigatonnes) inhabit surface soils across the world, with higher abundances in sub-Arctic regions (38% of total) than in temperate (24%) or tropical (21%) regions. Regional variations in these global trends also provide insights into local patterns of soil fertility and functioning. These high-resolution models provide the first steps towards representing soil ecological processes in global biogeochemical models and will enable the prediction of elemental cycling under current and future climate scenarios.
552 citations
Authors
Showing all 25808 results
Name | H-index | Papers | Citations |
---|---|---|---|
George Davey Smith | 224 | 2540 | 248373 |
David J. Hunter | 213 | 1836 | 207050 |
Grant W. Montgomery | 157 | 926 | 108118 |
Caroline S. Fox | 155 | 599 | 138951 |
Debbie A Lawlor | 147 | 1114 | 101123 |
Markus Ackermann | 146 | 610 | 71071 |
Hermann Kolanoski | 145 | 1279 | 96152 |
Paul Jackson | 141 | 1372 | 93464 |
Alan Ashworth | 134 | 578 | 72089 |
Conor Henderson | 133 | 1387 | 88725 |
David Smith | 129 | 2184 | 100917 |
Stuart J. Connolly | 125 | 610 | 75925 |
G. Merino | 123 | 687 | 66163 |
Richard J.H. Smith | 118 | 1308 | 61779 |
Yong-Guan Zhu | 115 | 684 | 46973 |