scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

University of Pittsburgh

EducationPittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
About: University of Pittsburgh is a education organization based out in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Transplantation. The organization has 87042 authors who have published 201012 publications receiving 9656783 citations. The organization is also known as: Pitt & Western University of Pennsylvania.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The results provide further evidence that a substantial proportion of heritability is captured by common SNPs, that height, BMI and QTi are highly polygenic traits, and that the additive variation explained by a part of the genome is approximately proportional to the total length of DNA contained within genes therein.
Abstract: We estimate and partition genetic variation for height, body mass index (BMI), von Willebrand factor and QT interval (QTi) using 586,898 SNPs genotyped on 11,586 unrelated individuals. We estimate that ∼45%, ∼17%, ∼25% and ∼21% of the variance in height, BMI, von Willebrand factor and QTi, respectively, can be explained by all autosomal SNPs and a further ∼0.5-1% can be explained by X chromosome SNPs. We show that the variance explained by each chromosome is proportional to its length, and that SNPs in or near genes explain more variation than SNPs between genes. We propose a new approach to estimate variation due to cryptic relatedness and population stratification. Our results provide further evidence that a substantial proportion of heritability is captured by common SNPs, that height, BMI and QTi are highly polygenic traits, and that the additive variation explained by a part of the genome is approximately proportional to the total length of DNA contained within genes therein.

912 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Most qualitative and quantitative antibody tests measure secondary effects of primary antigen-antibody interactions, but they do not always reflect the total antibody content of the antiserum with respect to the test antigen.
Abstract: Most qualitative and quantitative antibody tests measure secondary effects of primary antigen-antibody interactions. Some of these secondary effects are observed in vivo, such as the Arthus phenomenon and anaphylaxis; whereas some are observed in vitro, such as complement fixation, precipitation, erythrocyte agglutination, and hemolysis. These tests measure the capacity of an antiserum to produce the secondary effect selected as the indicator, but they do not always reflect the total antibody content of the antiserum with respect to the test antigen, since antibody in a given antiserum is heterogeneous with respect to the biological or physical effects it produces.1 Examples of diversity of antibody in a single antiserum are numerous even when considering one

912 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In the B-32 trial as discussed by the authors, women with invasive breast cancer were randomly assigned to receive either axillary-lymph-node (SLN) resection followed by immediate conventional ALND or SLN resection without ALND if SLNs were negative on intraoperative cytology and histological examination.
Abstract: Summary Background The goals of axillary-lymph-node dissection (ALND) are to maximise survival, provide regional control, and stage the patient. However, this technique has substantial side-effects. The purpose of the B-32 trial is to establish whether sentinel-lymph-node (SLN) resection can achieve the same therapeutic goals as conventional ALND but with decreased side-effects. The aim of this paper is to report the technical success and accuracy of SLN resection plus ALND versus SLN resection alone. Methods 5611 women with invasive breast cancer were randomly assigned to receive either SLN resection followed by immediate conventional ALND (n=2807; group 1) or SLN resection without ALND if SLNs were negative on intraoperative cytology and histological examination (n=2804; group 2) in the B-32 trial. Patients in group 2 underwent ALND if no SLNs were identified or if one or more SLNs were positive on intraoperative cytology or subsequent histological examination. Primary endpoints, including survival, regional control, and morbidity, will be reported later. Secondary endpoints are accuracy and technical success and are reported here. This trial is registered with the Clinical Trial registry, number NCT00003830. Findings Data for technical success were available for 5536 of 5611 patients; 75 declined protocol treatment, had no SLNs removed, or had no SLN resection done. SLNs were successfully removed in 97·2% of patients (5379 of 5536) in both groups combined. Identification of a preincision hot spot was associated with greater SLN removal (98·9% [5072 of 5128]). Only 1·4% (189 of 13171) of SLN specimens were outside of axillary levels I and II. 65·1% (8571 of 13 171) of SLN specimens were both radioactive and blue; a small percentage was identified by palpation only (3·9% [515 of 13 171]). The overall accuracy of SLN resection in patients in group 1 was 97·1% (2544 of 2619; 95% CI 96·4–97·7), with a false-negative rate of 9·8% (75 of 766; 95% CI 7·8–12·2). Differences in tumour location, type of biopsy, and number of SLNs removed significantly affected the false-negative rate. Allergic reactions related to blue dye occurred in 0·7% (37 of 5588) of patients with data on toxic effects. Interpretation The findings reported here indicate excellent balance in clinical patient characteristics between the two randomised groups and that the success of SLN resection was high. These findings are important because the B-32 trial is the only trial of sufficient size to provide definitive information related to the primary outcome measures of survival and regional control. Removal of more than one SLN and avoidance of excisional biopsy are important variables in reducing the false-negative rate.

912 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the influence of organization structure on the relationship between top management's entrepreneurial orientation and financial performance was examined, and it was found that an entrepreneurial top management style has a positive effect on the performance of organically-structured firms and a negative effect on mechanistically-structureured firms.
Abstract: This study examined the influence of organization structure on the relationship between top management's entrepreneurial orientation and financial performance. Moderated regression analysis was used to analyse data collected from 80 business organizations. the findings suggest that an entrepreneurial top management style has a positive effect on the performance of organically-structured firms and a negative effect on the performance of mechanistically-structured firms.

912 citations


Authors

Showing all 87737 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
JoAnn E. Manson2701819258509
Graham A. Colditz2611542256034
Yi Chen2174342293080
David J. Hunter2131836207050
David Miller2032573204840
Rakesh K. Jain2001467177727
Lewis C. Cantley196748169037
Dennis W. Dickson1911243148488
Terrie E. Moffitt182594150609
Dennis S. Charney179802122408
Ronald C. Petersen1781091153067
David L. Kaplan1771944146082
Jasvinder A. Singh1762382223370
Richard K. Wilson173463260000
Deborah J. Cook173907148928
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
University of Pennsylvania
257.6K papers, 14.1M citations

98% related

Johns Hopkins University
249.2K papers, 14M citations

97% related

Yale University
220.6K papers, 12.8M citations

97% related

Columbia University
224K papers, 12.8M citations

97% related

University of Washington
305.5K papers, 17.7M citations

97% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
2023260
20221,089
202111,152
202010,408
20199,333
20188,577