University of South Florida

About: University of South Florida is a education organization based out in Tampa, Florida, United States. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Poison control. The organization has 34231 authors who have published 72644 publications receiving 2538044 citations. The organization is also known as: USF.

Quandle cohomology and state-sum invariants of knotted curves and surfaces

Abstract: The 2-twist spun trefoil is an example of a sphere that is knotted in 4-dimensional space. A proof is given in this paper that this sphere is distinct from the same sphere with its orientation reversed. Our proof is based on a state-sum invariant for knotted surfaces developed via a cohomology theory of racks and quandles (also known as distributive groupoids). A quandle is a set with a binary operation - the axioms of which model the Reidemeister moves in classical knot theory. Colorings of diagrams of knotted curves and surfaces by quandle elements, together with cocycles of quandles, are used to define state-sum invariants for knotted circles in 3-space and knotted surfaces in 4-space. Cohomology groups of various quandles are computed herein and applied to the study of the state-sum invariants. Non-triviality of the invariants is proved for a variety of knots and links, and conversely, knot invariants are used to prove non-triviality of cohomology for a variety of quandles.

Cross-national differences in relationships of work demands, job satisfaction, and turnover intentions with work-family conflict

Abstract: A study of work interference with family (WIF) among managers is described, contrasting four clusters of countries, one of which is individualistic (Anglo) and three of which are collectivistic (Asia, East Europe, and Latin America). Country cluster (Anglo vs. each of the others) moderated the relation of work demands with strain-based WIF, with the Anglo country cluster having the strongest relationships. Country cluster moderated some of the relationships of strain-based WIF with both job satisfaction and turnover intentions, with Anglos showing the strongest relationships. Cluster differences in domestic help were ruled out as the possible explanation for these moderator results.

The geochemistry of young volcanism throughout western Panama and southeastern Costa Rica: an overview

Abstract: Oblique aseismic subduction below western Panama and southeastern Costa Rica has produced Recent arc-related volcanism. The aseismicity is probably related to the subduction of relatively hot oceanic lithosphere. The volcanism throughout this region over the past 2 Ma has been quite distinct, consisting of felsic magmas (andesites to rhyolites but mainly dacites) with geochemical signatures suggesting a metamorphosed basaltic source. It is believed that the subduction of young oceanic crust sets up conditions under which the slab melts rather than the overlying mantle wedge. Rocks with slab-melt geochemistries and associated with young subducted crust have been termed adakites elsewhere. The young adakite melts are sometimes associated with a few rare young high-Nb basalts, but there is no obvious genetic link between them through differentiation. High-Nb basalts may also be derived from the partial melting of the subducted oceanic crust. High-Nb basalt migmatites have been found with pegmatites of adakite compositions in the exposed subduction terrain of the Catalina Schist, California. Alternatively, the high-Nb basalts may be partial melts of phlogopite-rich mantle that has previously reacted with adakite magmas. Eruption of adakites and high-Nb basalts was preceded by a 2-3 Ma period of relative quiescence. Prior to this, there was a 7 Ma period of calc-alkaline volcanism typical of the present-day magmatism (associated with a distinct Benioff zone) found throughout the Central American arc. The abrupt transition in volcanism with time from an early calc-alkaline sequence to a later adakite-high-Nb basalt sequence may record a change in the tectonic setting of western Panama and southeastern Costa Rica over the past 12 Ma.

Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score: An Analysis of Reliability and Validity From the Spine Oncology Study Group

Abstract: Purpose Standardized indications for treatment of tumor-related spinal instability are hampered by the lack of a valid and reliable classification system. The objective of this study was to determine the interobserver reliability, intraobserver reliability, and predictive validity of the Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score (SINS). Methods Clinical and radiographic data from 30 patients with spinal tumors were classified as stable, potentially unstable, and unstable by members of the Spine Oncology Study Group. The median category for each patient case (consensus opinion) was used as the gold standard for predictive validity testing. On two occasions at least 6 weeks apart, each rater also scored each patient using SINS. Each total score was converted into a three-category data field, with 0 to 6 as stable, 7 to 12 as potentially unstable, and 13 to 18 as unstable. Results The statistics for interobserver reliability were 0.790, 0.841, 0.244, 0.456, 0.462, and 0.492 for the fields of location, pain, bone quality, alignment, vertebral body collapse, and posterolateral involvement, respectively. The statistics for intraobserver reliability were 0.806, 0.859, 0.528, 0.614, 0.590, and 0.662 for the same respective fields. Intraclass correlation coefficients for inter- and intraobserver reliability of total SINS score were 0.846 (95% CI, 0.773 to 0.911) and 0.886 (95% CI, 0.868 to 0.902), respectively. The statistic for predictive validity was 0.712 (95% CI, 0.676 to 0.766). Conclusion SINS demonstrated near-perfect inter- and intraobserver reliability in determining three clinically relevant categories of stability. The sensitivity and specificity of SINS for potentially unstable or unstable lesions were 95.7% and 79.5%, respectively. J Clin Oncol 29:3072-3077. © 2011 by American Society of Clinical Oncology

Osteopontin identified as lead marker of colon cancer progression, using pooled Sample expression profiling

Abstract: Background: New tumor markers and markers of tumor progression are needed for improved staging and for better assessment of treatment of many cancers. Gene expression profiling techniques offer the opportunity to discover such markers. We investigated the feasibility of sample pooling strategy in combination with a novel analysis algorithm to identify markers. Methods: Total RNA from human colon tumors (n = 60) of multiple stages (adenomas; cancers with modified Astler Collier stages B, C, and D; and liver metastases) were pooled within stages and compared with pooled normal mucosal specimens (n = 10) by using oligonucleotide expression arrays. Genes that showed consistent increases or decreases in their expression through tumor progression were identified. Northern blot analysis was used to validate the findings. All statistical tests were two-sided. Results: More than 300 candidate tumor markers and more than 100 markers of tumor progression were identified. Northern analysis of 11 candidate tumor markers confirmed the gene expression changes. The gene for the secreted integrinbinding protein osteopontin was most consistently differentially expressed in conjunction with tumor progression. Its potential as a progression marker was validated (Spearman’s = 0.903; P<.001) with northern blot analysis using RNA from an independent set of 10 normal and 43 tumor samples representing all stages. Moreover, a statistically significant correlation between osteopontin protein expression and advancing tumor stage was identified with the use of 303 additional specimens (human cancer = 185, adenomas = 67, and normal mucosal specimens = 51) (Spearman’s = 0.667; P<.001). Conclusions: Sample pooling can be a powerful, cost-effective, and rapid means of identifying the most common changes in a gene expression profile. We identified osteopontin as a clinically useful marker of tumor progression by use of gene expression profiling on pooled samples. [J Natl Cancer Inst 2002;94:513–21]