Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses
Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
A new quantity is developed, I 2, which the authors believe gives a better measure of the consistency between trials in a meta-analysis, which is susceptible to the number of trials included in the meta- analysis.Abstract:
Cochrane Reviews have recently started including the quantity I 2 to help readers assess the consistency of the results of studies in meta-analyses. What does this new quantity mean, and why is assessment of heterogeneity so important to clinical practice?
Systematic reviews and meta-analyses can provide convincing and reliable evidence relevant to many aspects of medicine and health care.1 Their value is especially clear when the results of the studies they include show clinically important effects of similar magnitude. However, the conclusions are less clear when the included studies have differing results. In an attempt to establish whether studies are consistent, reports of meta-analyses commonly present a statistical test of heterogeneity. The test seeks to determine whether there are genuine differences underlying the results of the studies (heterogeneity), or whether the variation in findings is compatible with chance alone (homogeneity). However, the test is susceptible to the number of trials included in the meta-analysis. We have developed a new quantity, I 2, which we believe gives a better measure of the consistency between trials in a meta-analysis.
Assessment of the consistency of effects across studies is an essential part of meta-analysis. Unless we know how consistent the results of studies are, we cannot determine the generalisability of the findings of the meta-analysis. Indeed, several hierarchical systems for grading evidence state that the results of studies must be consistent or homogeneous to obtain the highest grading.2–4
Tests for heterogeneity are commonly used to decide on methods for combining studies and for concluding consistency or inconsistency of findings.5 6 But what does the test achieve in practice, and how should the resulting P values be interpreted?
A test for heterogeneity examines the null hypothesis that all studies are evaluating the same effect. The usual test statistic …read more
Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Thrombolysis for acute ischaemic stroke
TL;DR: Thrombolytic therapy, mostly administered up to six hours after ischaemic stroke, significantly reduced the proportion of participants who were dead or dependent at three to six months after stroke and increased the risk of symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage.
Journal ArticleDOI
Risk factors for suicide in individuals with depression: a systematic review.
TL;DR: A systematic review of the international literature on cohort and case-control studies of people with depression in which suicide was an outcome and meta-analyses of potential risk factors found factors significantly associated with suicide.
Journal ArticleDOI
Prevalence, incidence and mortality from cardiovascular disease in patients with pooled and specific severe mental illness: a large-scale meta-analysis of 3,211,768 patients and 113,383,368 controls.
Christoph U. Correll,Marco Solmi,Nicola Veronese,Beatrice Bortolato,Stella Rosson,Paolo Santonastaso,Nita Thapa-Chhetri,Michele Fornaro,Davide Gallicchio,Enrico Collantoni,Giorgio Pigato,Angela Favaro,Francesco Monaco,Cristiano A. Köhler,Davy Vancampfort,Philip B. Ward,Fiona Gaughran,André F. Carvalho,Brendon Stubbs +18 more
TL;DR: This large‐scale meta‐analysis confirms that SMI patients have significantly increased risk of CVD and CVD‐related mortality, and that elevated body mass index, antipsychotic use, andCVD screening and management require urgent clinical attention.
Journal ArticleDOI
Association of Dietary, Circulating, and Supplement Fatty Acids With Coronary Risk: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Rajiv Chowdhury,Samantha Warnakula,Setor K Kunutsor,Francesca L. Crowe,Heather Ward,Laura Johnson,Oscar H. Franco,Adam S. Butterworth,Nita G. Forouhi,Simon G. Thompson,Kay-Tee Khaw,Dariush Mozaffarian,John Danesh,Emanuele Di Angelantonio +13 more
TL;DR: Current evidence does not clearly support cardiovascular guidelines that encourage high consumption of polyunsaturated fatty acids and low consumption of total saturated fats.
Journal ArticleDOI
Uncertainty in heterogeneity estimates in meta-analyses
TL;DR: It is argued that, although meta-analyses often measure heterogeneity between studies, these estimates can have large uncertainty, which must be taken into account when interpreting evidence.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis
TL;DR: It is concluded that H and I2, which can usually be calculated for published meta-analyses, are particularly useful summaries of the impact of heterogeneity, and one or both should be presented in publishedMeta-an analyses in preference to the test for heterogeneity.
Journal ArticleDOI
The combination of estimates from different experiments.
TL;DR: The problem of making a combined estimate has been discussed previously by Cochran and Yates and Cochran (1937) for agricultural experiments, and by Bliss (1952) for bioassays in different laboratories as discussed by the authors.
Journal ArticleDOI
Tamoxifen for early breast cancer: An overview of the randomised trials
TL;DR: The absolute improvement in recurrence was greater during the first 5 years, whereas the improvement in survival grew steadily larger throughout the first 10 years, and these benefits appeared to be largely irrespective of age, menopausal status, daily tamoxifen dose, and of whether chemotherapy had been given to both groups.
Journal Article
Tamoxifen for early breast cancer: an overview of the randomised trials. Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group
TL;DR: There have been many randomised trials of adjuvant tamoxifen among women with early breast cancer, and an updated overview of their results is presented in this paper, which approximately doubles the amount of evidence from trials of about 5 years of tamoxifier and, taking all trials together, on events occurring more than 5 years after randomisation.
Journal ArticleDOI
Funnel plots for detecting bias in meta-analysis: guidelines on choice of axis.
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors evaluated standard error, precision (inverse of standard error), variance, inverse of variance, sample size and log sample size (vertical axis) and log odds ratio, log risk ratio and risk difference (horizontal axis).