scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

Role of cell cycle in mediating sensitivity to radiotherapy.

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
This work describes how cell cycle and DNA damage checkpoint control relates to exposure to ionizing radiation and suggests that one way in which chemotherapy and fractionated radiotherapy may work better is by partial synchronization of cells in the most radiosensitive phase of the cell cycle.
Abstract
Multiple pathways are involved in maintaining the genetic integrity of a cell after its exposure to ionizing radiation. Although repair mechanisms such as homologous recombination and nonhomologous end-joining are important mammalian responses to double-strand DNA damage, cell cycle regulation is perhaps the most important determinant of ionizing radiation sensitivity. A common cellular response to DNA-damaging agents is the activation of cell cycle checkpoints. The DNA damage induced by ionizing radiation initiates signals that can ultimately activate either temporary checkpoints that permit time for genetic repair or irreversible growth arrest that results in cell death (necrosis or apoptosis). Such checkpoint activation constitutes an integrated response that involves sensor (RAD, BRCA, NBS1), transducer (ATM, CHK), and effector (p53, p21, CDK) genes. One of the key proteins in the checkpoint pathways is the tumor suppressor gene p53, which coordinates DNA repair with cell cycle progression and apoptosis. Specifically, in addition to other mediators of the checkpoint response (CHK kinases, p21), p53 mediates the two major DNA damage-dependent cellular checkpoints, one at the G(1)-S transition and the other at the G(2)-M transition, although the influence on the former process is more direct and significant. The cell cycle phase also determines a cell's relative radiosensitivity, with cells being most radiosensitive in the G(2)-M phase, less sensitive in the G(1) phase, and least sensitive during the latter part of the S phase. This understanding has, therefore, led to the realization that one way in which chemotherapy and fractionated radiotherapy may work better is by partial synchronization of cells in the most radiosensitive phase of the cell cycle. We describe how cell cycle and DNA damage checkpoint control relates to exposure to ionizing radiation.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

The role of hypoxia in cancer progression, angiogenesis, metastasis, and resistance to therapy.

TL;DR: Better understanding of the role of hypoxia in cancer progression will open new windows for the discovery of new therapeutics targeting hypoxic tumor cells and hypoxic microenvironment.
Journal ArticleDOI

A Consensus Molecular Classification of Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer.

TL;DR: In this paper, a consensus set of six molecular classes (luminal papillary (24%), luminal nonspecified (8), luminal unstable (15), stroma-rich (15%), basal/squamous (35%), and neuroendocrine-like (3%) was identified.
Journal ArticleDOI

Gold nanoparticles for applications in cancer radiotherapy: Mechanisms and recent advancements.

TL;DR: An overview of the current state of AuNP‐based radiosensitization in the context of the physical, chemical and biological modes of radiosensItization is presented, with design considerations to guide the development of next generation AuNPs for clinical applications.
Journal ArticleDOI

Autophagy and cancer therapy.

TL;DR: Autophagy is a dynamic process of protein degradation which is typically observed during nutrient deprivation, and this type of non-apoptotic cell death has been documented mainly by observing morphological changes, so autophagic cell death is considered programmed cell death type II, whereas apoptosis is programmed cellDeath type I.
Journal ArticleDOI

Physical basis and biological mechanisms of gold nanoparticle radiosensitization

TL;DR: There is an apparent disparity between the observed experimental findings and the level of radiosensitization predicted by mass energy absorption and GNP concentration, which is highlighted to highlight potential underlying biological mechanisms of response in GNP radiosensItization.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

p53, the Cellular Gatekeeper for Growth and Division

TL;DR: The author regrets the lack of citations for many important observations mentioned in the text, but their omission is made necessary by restrictions in the preparation of review manuscripts.
Journal ArticleDOI

CDK inhibitors: positive and negative regulators of G1-phase progression

TL;DR: This work challenges previous assumptions about how the G1/S transition of the mammalian cell cycle is governed, helps explain some enigmatic features of cell cycle control that also involve the functions of the retinoblastoma protein (Rb) and the INK4 proteins, and changes the thinking about how either p16 loss or overexpression of cyclin D-dependent kinases contribute to cancer.
Journal ArticleDOI

Apoptosis by death factor.

TL;DR: This work was supported in part by Grants-in-Aid from the Ministry of Education, Science, and Culture of Japan and by a Research Grant from the Princess Takamatsu Cancer Research Fund, and performed in part through Special Coordination Funds of the Science and Technology Agency of the Japanese Government.
Journal ArticleDOI

Mdm2 promotes the rapid degradation of p53

TL;DR: It is proposed that the Mdm2-promoted degradation of p53 provides a new mechanism to ensure effective termination of the p53 signal.
Journal Article

Participation of p53 Protein in the Cellular Response to DNA Damage

TL;DR: A role for the wild-type p53 protein in the inhibition of DNA synthesis that follows DNA damage is suggested and a new mechanism for how the loss of wild- type p53 might contribute to tumorigenesis is suggested.
Related Papers (5)