scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessBook

Social Dominance: An Intergroup Theory of Social Hierarchy and Oppression

TLDR
In this paper, the authors present a theory of intergroup relations from visiousness to viciousness, and the psychology of group dominance, as well as the dynamics of the criminal justice system.
Abstract
Part I. From There to Here - Theoretical Background: 1. From visiousness to viciousness: theories of intergroup relations 2. Social dominance theory as a new synthesis Part II. Oppression and its Psycho-Ideological Elements: 3. The psychology of group dominance: social dominance orientation 4. Let's both agree that you're really stupid: the power of consensual ideology Part III. The Circle of Oppression - The Myriad Expressions of Institutional Discrimination: 5. You stay in your part of town and I'll stay in mine: discrimination in the housing and retail markets 6. They're just too lazy to work: discrimination in the labor market 7. They're just mentally and physically unfit: discrimination in education and health care 8. The more of 'them' in prison, the better: institutional terror, social control and the dynamics of the criminal justice system Part IV. Oppression as a Cooperative Game: 9. Social hierarchy and asymmetrical group behavior: social hierarchy and group difference in behavior 10. Sex and power: the intersecting political psychologies of patriarchy and empty-set hierarchy 11. Epilogue.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Another view of “we”: Majority and minority group perspectives on a common ingroup identity

TL;DR: More recently, this article extended the Common Ingroup Identity Model by considering more fully alternative forms of recategorisation (a dual identity as well as a one-group representation), the different preferences of majority and minority groups for these different forms, and the potential implications of these different preferences on the content of intergroup interaction and on the possibilities for social change towards equality.
Journal ArticleDOI

Differentiating the effects of status and power: a justice perspective.

TL;DR: 5 studies tested the prediction that status and power would have opposing effects on justice enacted toward others and showed consistent evidence that status is positively associated withJustice toward others, while power is negatively associated with justice toward others.
Journal ArticleDOI

Priming meritocracy and the psychological justification of inequality

TL;DR: The authors found that activating meritocratic beliefs increases the extent to which individuals psychologically justify status inequalities, even when those inequalities are disadvantageous to the self, and that priming meritocracy prompts individuals to engage in system-justifying psychological responses when they experience threat either at the personal or group level.
Journal ArticleDOI

Yet another dark side of chivalry: Benevolent sexism undermines and hostile sexism motivates collective action for social change.

TL;DR: It is demonstrated that exposing women to benevolent sexism decreases their engagement in collective action, whereas exposure to hostile sexism increases it, and results from Studies 3 and 4 support the causal chain described in the mediational models tested in Studies 1 and 2.
Journal ArticleDOI

Collective action: Towards a dual-pathway model

TL;DR: In this article, a dual-pathway model of collective action is proposed, based on social-psychological approaches and traditional social movement research, in line with traditional social movements.
References
More filters
Book

The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life

TL;DR: For instance, in the case of an individual in the presence of others, it can be seen as a form of involuntary expressive behavior as discussed by the authors, where the individual will have to act so that he intentionally or unintentionally expresses himself, and the others will in turn have to be impressed in some way by him.
Journal ArticleDOI

The Genetical Evolution of Social Behaviour. I

TL;DR: A genetical mathematical model is described which allows for interactions between relatives on one another's fitness and a quantity is found which incorporates the maximizing property of Darwinian fitness, named “inclusive fitness”.
Book ChapterDOI

Parental investment and sexual selection

TL;DR: The p,cnetics of sex nas now becn clarif ied, and Fishcr ( 1958 ) hrs produccd , n,od"l to cxplarn sex ratios at coDception, a nrodel recently extendcd to include special mccha_ nisms that operate under inbreeding (Hunrilron I96?).
Journal ArticleDOI

The Department of Health and Human Services.

TL;DR: This letter is in response to your two Citizen Petitions, requesting that the Food and Drug Administration (FDA or the Agency) require a cancer warning on cosmetic talc products.