scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

Australian Catholic University

EducationBrisbane, Queensland, Australia
About: Australian Catholic University is a education organization based out in Brisbane, Queensland, Australia. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Poison control. The organization has 2721 authors who have published 10013 publications receiving 215248 citations. The organization is also known as: ACU & ACU National.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: These studies underscore the role of autonomy, competence, and relatedness in explaining the well-being benefits of benevolence, and they also point to the independent role of beneficence as a source of human wellness.
Abstract: Pro-social behaviors have been associated with enhanced well-being, but what psychological mechanisms explain this connection? Some theories suggest that beneficence—the sense of being able to give—inherently improves well-being, whereas evidence from self-determination theory (Weinstein & Ryan, 2010) shows that increases in well-being are mediated by satisfaction of innate psychological needs for autonomy, competence, and relatedness. Here we simultaneously assess these two explanations. Study 1 (N = 335) used a cross-sectional survey with an Internet sample to develop a measure to assess beneficence satisfaction. The next two cross-sectional Internet-sample studies tested mediators between pro-social behavior and general well-being (Study 2, N = 332) and situational peak moment well-being (Study 3, N = 180). A fourth study (N = 85) used a diary method with university students to assess daily fluctuations in well-being associated with needs and beneficence. It was shown across all studies that both the three psychological needs and beneficence satisfaction mediate the relations between pro-social actions and well-being, with all four factors emerging as independent predictors. Together, these studies underscore the role of autonomy, competence, and relatedness in explaining the well-being benefits of benevolence, and they also point to the independent role of beneficence as a source of human wellness.

212 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The evidence base to support the common practice of superficial heat and cold for low back pain is limited and there is a need for future higher-quality randomised controlled trials as discussed by the authors.
Abstract: Background Heat and cold are commonly utilised in the treatment of low-back pain by both health care professionals and people with low-back pain. Objectives To assess the effects of superficial heat and cold therapy for low-back pain in adults. Search strategy We searched the Cochrane Back Review Group Specialised register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library Issue 3, 2005), MEDLINE (1966 to October 2005), EMBASE (1980 to October 2005) and other relevant databases. Selection criteria We included randomised controlled trials and non-randomised controlled trials that examined superficial heat or cold therapies in people with low-back pain. Data collection and analysis Two authors independently assessed methodological quality and extracted data, using the criteria recommended by the Cochrane Back Review Group. Main results Nine trials involving 1117 participants were included. In two trials of 258 participants with a mix of acute and sub-acute low-back pain, heat wrap therapy significantly reduced pain after five days (weighted mean difference (WMD) 1.06, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.68 to 1.45, scale range 0 to 5) compared to oral placebo. One trial of 90 participants with acute low-back pain found that a heated blanket significantly decreased acute low-back pain immediately after application (WMD -32.20, 95%CI -38.69 to -25.71, scale range 0 to 100). One trial of 100 participants with a mix of acute and sub-acute low-back pain examined the additional effects of adding exercise to heat wrap, and found that it reduced pain after seven days. There is insufficient evidence to evaluate the effects of cold for low-back pain, and conflicting evidence for any differences between heat and cold for low-back pain. Authors' conclusions The evidence base to support the common practice of superficial heat and cold for low back pain is limited and there is a need for future higher-quality randomised controlled trials. There is moderate evidence in a small number of trials that heat wrap therapy provides a small short-term reduction in pain and disability in a population with a mix of acute and sub-acute low-back pain, and that the addition of exercise further reduces pain and improves function. The evidence for the application of cold treatment to low-back pain is even more limited, with only three poor quality studies located. No conclusions can be drawn about the use of cold for low-back pain. There is conflicting evidence to determine the differences between heat and cold for low-back pain.

211 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The What Is Happening in this Class? (WIHIC) questionnaire was validated cross-nationally using a sample of 3980 high school students from Australia, the UK and Canada as discussed by the authors.
Abstract: The What Is Happening In this Class? (WIHIC) questionnaire was validated cross-nationally using a sample of 3980 high school students from Australia, the UK and Canada. Confirmatory factor analysis supported the seven-scale a priori structure of the instrument. Fit statistics indicated a good fit of the model to the data. While all items loaded strongly on their a priori factor, model fit indices revealed a degree of scale overlap. The use of multi-sample analyses within structural equation modelling substantiated invariant factor structures for three grouping variables: country, grade level and student gender. This study supported the wide international applicability of the WIHIC as a valid measure of classroom psychosocial environment.

210 citations


Authors

Showing all 2824 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
John J.V. McMurray1781389184502
James F. Sallis169825144836
Richard M. Ryan164405244550
Herbert W. Marsh15264689512
Jacquelynne S. Eccles13637884036
John A. Kanis13362596992
Edward L. Deci130284206930
Thomas J. Ryan11667567462
Bruce E. Kemp11042345441
Mark J. Nieuwenhuijsen10764749080
Peter Rosenbaum10344645732
Barbara Riegel10150777674
Ego Seeman10152946392
Paul J. Frick10030633579
Robert J. Vallerand9830141840
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
La Trobe University
41.2K papers, 1.1M citations

87% related

Flinders University
32.8K papers, 973.1K citations

86% related

Griffith University
49.3K papers, 1.4M citations

85% related

Monash University
100.6K papers, 3M citations

84% related

University of Newcastle
51.8K papers, 1.6M citations

84% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
202386
2022163
2021984
2020888
2019902
2018903