Institution
Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust
Healthcare•London, United Kingdom•
About: Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust is a healthcare organization based out in London, United Kingdom. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Medicine. The organization has 7686 authors who have published 9631 publications receiving 399353 citations. The organization is also known as: Guy's and St Thomas' National Health Service Foundation Trust & Guy's and St Thomas' National Health Service Trust.
Topics: Population, Medicine, Randomized controlled trial, Cancer, Breast cancer
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
••
John Radcliffe Hospital1, University of Oxford2, King's College London3, Qatar Airways4, Qatar Foundation5, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation6, University of Melbourne7, University of Western Australia8, The George Institute for Global Health9, RAND Corporation10, Novo Nordisk Foundation11, Lundbeck12, Karolinska Institutet13, Goethe University Frankfurt14, Brandeis University15, University of Michigan16, Birkbeck, University of London17, Stanford University18, Open University of Catalonia19, Universiti Brunei Darussalam20, University of Zambia21, University of Malawi22, Churchill Hospital23, University of Toronto24, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust25, Rhodes University26
TL;DR: It is argued that gender-sensitive research impact assessment could become a force for good in moving science policy and practice towards gender equity and is offered a set of recommendations to research funders, research institutions and research evaluators who conduct impact assessment.
Abstract: Global investment in biomedical research has grown significantly over the last decades, reaching approximately a quarter of a trillion US dollars in 2010. However, not all of this investment is distributed evenly by gender. It follows, arguably, that scarce research resources may not be optimally invested (by either not supporting the best science or by failing to investigate topics that benefit women and men equitably). Women across the world tend to be significantly underrepresented in research both as researchers and research participants, receive less research funding, and appear less frequently than men as authors on research publications. There is also some evidence that women are relatively disadvantaged as the beneficiaries of research, in terms of its health, societal and economic impacts. Historical gender biases may have created a path dependency that means that the research system and the impacts of research are biased towards male researchers and male beneficiaries, making it inherently difficult (though not impossible) to eliminate gender bias. In this commentary, we – a group of scholars and practitioners from Africa, America, Asia and Europe – argue that gender-sensitive research impact assessment could become a force for good in moving science policy and practice towards gender equity. Research impact assessment is the multidisciplinary field of scientific inquiry that examines the research process to maximise scientific, societal and economic returns on investment in research. It encompasses many theoretical and methodological approaches that can be used to investigate gender bias and recommend actions for change to maximise research impact. We offer a set of recommendations to research funders, research institutions and research evaluators who conduct impact assessment on how to include and strengthen analysis of gender equity in research impact assessment and issue a global call for action.
103 citations
••
TL;DR: The data confirm that duplications and deletions at 16p13.11 represent incompletely penetrant pathogenic mutations that predispose to a range of neurodevelopmental disorders, and suggest a sex-limited effect on the penetrance of the pathological phenotypes at the 16p 13.11 locus.
Abstract: Copy number variants (CNVs) at chromosome 16p1311 have been associated with a range of neurodevelopmental disorders including autism, ADHD, intellectual disability and schizophrenia Significant sex differences in prevalence, course and severity have been described for a number of these conditions but the biological and environmental factors underlying such sex-specific features remain unclear We tested the burden and the possible sex-biased effect of CNVs at 16p1311 in a sample of 10,397 individuals with a range of neurodevelopmental conditions, clinically referred for array comparative genomic hybridisation (aCGH); cases were compared with 11,277 controls In order to identify candidate phenotype-associated genes, we performed an interval-based analysis and investigated the presence of ohnologs at 16p1311; finally, we searched the DECIPHER database for previously identified 16p1311 copy number variants In the clinical referral series, we identified 46 cases with CNVs of variable size at 16p1311, including 28 duplications and 18 deletions Patients were referred for various phenotypes, including developmental delay, autism, speech delay, learning difficulties, behavioural problems, epilepsy, microcephaly and physical dysmorphisms CNVs at 16p1311 were also present in 17 controls Association analysis revealed an excess of CNVs in cases compared with controls (OR = 259; p = 00005), and a sex-biased effect, with a significant enrichment of CNVs only in the male subgroup of cases (OR = 562; p = 00002), but not in females (OR = 119, p = 0673) The same pattern of results was also observed in the DECIPHER sample Interval-based analysis showed a significant enrichment of case CNVs containing interval II (OR = 259; p = 00005), located in the 083 Mb genomic region between 1549–1632 Mb, and encompassing the four ohnologs NDE1, MYH11, ABCC1 and ABCC6 Our data confirm that duplications and deletions at 16p1311 represent incompletely penetrant pathogenic mutations that predispose to a range of neurodevelopmental disorders, and suggest a sex-limited effect on the penetrance of the pathological phenotypes at the 16p1311 locus
103 citations
••
103 citations
••
TL;DR: Patients diagnosed with advanced iCCA have a better OS compared to other BTCs; similar trend was identified for patients diagnosed with liver-only iCC a, which is to be considered for future clinical trial design.
Abstract: Background The incidence of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) is increasing. The aim of the study was to provide reference survival data for patients with advanced iCCA treated with first-line cisplatin-gemcitabine chemotherapy (current standard of care). Methods Individual data from patients with iCCA recruited into the prospective, random assignment Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer (ABC)-01, -02, and -03 studies were retrieved. The prevalence and survival of liver-only iCCA was also assessed. Survival analysis was performed using univariate and multivariable Cox regression. All statistical tests were two-sided. Results Of 534 patients recruited into the ABC-01, -02, and -03 studies, 109 (20.4%) had iCCA. Most patients (n = 86, 78.9%) had metastatic disease at the time of recruitment; 52 patients (47.7%) had liver-only disease. Following random assignment, 66 (60.6%) iCCA patients received cisplatin and gemcitabine. The median progression-free and overall survival (OS) were 8.4 months (95% confidence interval [CI] = 5.9 to 8.9 months) and 15.4 months (95% CI = 11.1 to 17.9 months), respectively. Of these 66 patients, 34 patients (51.5%) had liver-only disease. Following chemotherapy, 30 (45.5%) and 21 (31.8%) were progression-free at 3 and 6 months from chemotherapy commencement, respectively. The median OS for patients with liver-only iCCA at diagnosis and after 3 and 6 months of chemotherapy was 16.7 months (95% CI = 8.7 to 20.2 months), 17.9 months (95% CI = 11.7 to 20.9 months), and 18.9 months (95% CI = 16.7 to 25.9 months), respectively. Multivariable analysis confirmed that iCCA had a longer OS compared with other non-iCCA biliary tract cancers (hazard ratio = 0.58, 95% CI = 0.35 to 0.95, P value = .03); liver-only iCCA patients also showed longer OS even though findings did not reach statistical significance (hazard ratio = 0.65, 95% CI = 0.36 to 1.19, P value = .16). Conclusions Patients diagnosed with advanced iCCA have a better OS compared with other biliary tract cancers; a similar trend was identified for patients diagnosed with liver-only iCCA. These findings are to be considered for future clinical trial design.
102 citations
••
TL;DR: A model in which development of a dominant JAK2V617F-homzygous subclone drives erythrocytosis in many PV patients is suggested, with alternative mechanisms operating in those with small or undetectable homozygous-mutant clones.
102 citations
Authors
Showing all 7765 results
Name | H-index | Papers | Citations |
---|---|---|---|
Christopher J L Murray | 209 | 754 | 310329 |
Bruce M. Psaty | 181 | 1205 | 138244 |
Giuseppe Remuzzi | 172 | 1226 | 160440 |
Mika Kivimäki | 166 | 1515 | 141468 |
Simon I. Hay | 165 | 557 | 153307 |
Theo Vos | 156 | 502 | 186409 |
Ali H. Mokdad | 156 | 634 | 160599 |
Steven Williams | 144 | 1375 | 86712 |
Igor Rudan | 142 | 658 | 103659 |
Mohsen Naghavi | 139 | 381 | 169048 |
Christopher D.M. Fletcher | 138 | 674 | 82484 |
Martin McKee | 138 | 1732 | 125972 |
David A. Jackson | 136 | 1095 | 68352 |
Graham G. Giles | 136 | 1249 | 80038 |
Yang Liu | 129 | 2506 | 122380 |