scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

Institute for Systems Biology

NonprofitSeattle, Washington, United States
About: Institute for Systems Biology is a nonprofit organization based out in Seattle, Washington, United States. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Proteomics. The organization has 1277 authors who have published 2777 publications receiving 353165 citations.


Papers
More filters
Posted Content
TL;DR: In this article, a new decomposition of vector fields that permits the computation of a quasi-potential function that is equivalent to the Freidlin-Wentzell potential but is not limited to two attractors is proposed.
Abstract: Developmental dynamics of multicellular organism is a process that takes place in a multi-stable system in which each attractor state represents a cell type and attractor transitions correspond to cell differentiation paths. This new understanding has revived the idea of a quasi-potential landscape, first proposed by Waddington as a metaphor. To describe development one is interested in the "relative stabilities" of N attractors (N>2). Existing theories of state transition between local minima on some potential landscape deal with the exit in the transition between a pair attractor but do not offer the notion of a global potential function that relate more than two attractors to each other. Several ad hoc methods have been used in systems biology to compute a landscape in non-gradient systems, such as gene regulatory networks. Here we present an overview of the currently available methods, discuss their limitations and propose a new decomposition of vector fields that permit the computation of a quasi-potential function that is equivalent to the Freidlin-Wentzell potential but is not limited to two attractors. Several examples of decomposition are given and the significance of such a quasi-potential function is discussed.

171 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: A compendium of assays is described to quantify 97% of the 4,012 annotated Mtb proteins by the targeted mass spectrometric method selected reaction monitoring (SRM), revealing a dynamic range within the Mtb proteome of over four orders of magnitude.

171 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The techniques and available software for combining the results of multiple search engines are reviewed and the relative performance of these techniques is compared.

170 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
01 Oct 2003-Proteins
TL;DR: It is found that a solvent‐accessible surface area–based solvation provided the best enrichment and discrimination of close‐to‐native decoys and the combination of this solvation treatment with Lennard Jones terms and the original Rosetta energy provided better enrichment anddiscrimination than any of the individual terms.
Abstract: We have improved the original Rosetta centroid/backbone decoy set by increasing the number of proteins and frequency of near native models and by building on sidechains and minimizing clashes. The new set consists of 1,400 model structures for 78 different and diverse protein targets and provides a challenging set for the testing and evaluation of scoring functions. We evaluated the extent to which a variety of all-atom energy functions could identify the native and close-to-native structures in the new decoy sets. Of various implicit solvent models, we found that a solvent-accessible surface area-based solvation provided the best enrichment and discrimination of close-to-native decoys. The combination of this solvation treatment with Lennard Jones terms and the original Rosetta energy provided better enrichment and discrimination than any of the individual terms. The results also highlight the differences in accuracy of NMR and X-ray crystal structures: a large energy gap was observed between native and non-native conformations for X-ray structures but not for NMR structures.

169 citations

Proceedings Article
01 Jan 2012
TL;DR: Cluster Layout Planarity testing Booth/Lueker and Boyer/Myrvold Cluster (Feng et al.), Upward (Bertolazzi et al.) Customizable planarization method Edge insertion (fixed & variable embedding) Crossing.
Abstract: Cluster Layout Planarity testing Booth/Lueker and Boyer/Myrvold Cluster (Feng et al) Upward (Bertolazzi et al) Customizable planarization method Edge insertion (fixed & variable embedding) Crossing Minimization optimal, minor-monotone, simultaneous Orthogonal layout Compaction (constructive + improvement) Customizable Sugiyama layout Energy-based layout (FM, ) Tree-, Circular-, Balloon-layout,

169 citations


Authors

Showing all 1292 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
Younan Xia216943175757
Ruedi Aebersold182879141881
David Haussler172488224960
Steven P. Gygi172704129173
Nahum Sonenberg167647104053
Leroy Hood158853128452
Mark H. Ellisman11763755289
Wei Zhang112118993641
John Ralph10944239238
Eric H. Davidson10645447058
James R. Heath10342558548
Alan Aderem9924646682
Anne-Claude Gingras9733640714
Trey Ideker9730672276
Michael H. Gelb9450634714
Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
20233
202260
2021216
2020204
2019188
2018168