scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

Institute for Systems Biology

NonprofitSeattle, Washington, United States
About: Institute for Systems Biology is a nonprofit organization based out in Seattle, Washington, United States. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Proteomics. The organization has 1277 authors who have published 2777 publications receiving 353165 citations.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
28 May 2015-PLOS ONE
TL;DR: The data support a novel model that links a mixed EM signature with stemness in individual cells, luminal and basal cell lines, in vivo xenograft mouse models, and in all breast cancer subtypes and suggest that targeting E/M heterogeneity by eliminating hybrid E-M cells and cooperation between E and M cell-types could improve breast cancer patient survival independent of breast cancer-subtype.
Abstract: Breast cancer stem cells (CSCs) are thought to drive recurrence and metastasis. Their identity has been linked to the epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT) but remains highly controversial since--depending on the cell-line studied--either epithelial (E) or mesenchymal (M) markers, alone or together have been associated with stemness. Using distinct transcript expression signatures characterizing the three different E, M and hybrid E/M cell-types, our data support a novel model that links a mixed EM signature with stemness in 1) individual cells, 2) luminal and basal cell lines, 3) in vivo xenograft mouse models, and 4) in all breast cancer subtypes. In particular, we found that co-expression of E and M signatures was associated with poorest outcome in luminal and basal breast cancer patients as well as with enrichment for stem-like cells in both E and M breast cell-lines. This link between a mixed EM expression signature and stemness was explained by two findings: first, mixed cultures of E and M cells showed increased cooperation in mammosphere formation (indicative of stemness) compared to the more differentiated E and M cell-types. Second, single-cell qPCR analysis revealed that E and M genes could be co-expressed in the same cell. These hybrid E/M cells were generated by both E or M cells and had a combination of several stem-like traits since they displayed increased plasticity, self-renewal, mammosphere formation, and produced ALDH1+ progenies, while more differentiated M cells showed less plasticity and E cells showed less self-renewal. Thus, the hybrid E/M state reflecting stemness and its promotion by E-M cooperation offers a dual biological rationale for the robust association of the mixed EM signature with poor prognosis, independent of cellular origin. Together, our model explains previous paradoxical findings that breast CSCs appear to be M in luminal cell-lines but E in basal breast cancer cell-lines. Our results suggest that targeting E/M heterogeneity by eliminating hybrid E/M cells and cooperation between E and M cell-types could improve breast cancer patient survival independent of breast cancer-subtype.

327 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: It is proposed that L1 families with different 5'UTR can coexist because they don't rely on the same host-encoded factors for their transcription and therefore do not compete with each other.
Abstract: We investigated the evolution of the families of LINE-1 (L1) retrotransposons that have amplified in the human lineage since the origin of primates. We identified two phases in the evolution of L1. From approximately 70 million years ago (Mya) until approximately 40 Mya, three distinct L1 lineages were simultaneously active in the genome of ancestral primates. In contrast, during the last 40 million years (Myr), i.e., during the evolution of anthropoid primates, a single lineage of families has evolved and amplified. We found that novel (i.e., unrelated) regulatory regions (5'UTR) have been frequently recruited during the evolution of L1, whereas the two open-reading frames (ORF1 and ORF2) have remained relatively conserved. We found that L1 families coexisted and formed independently evolving L1 lineages only when they had different 5'UTRs. We propose that L1 families with different 5'UTR can coexist because they don't rely on the same host-encoded factors for their transcription and therefore do not compete with each other. The most prolific L1 families (families L1PA8 to L1PA3) amplified between 40 and 12 Mya. This period of high activity corresponds to an episode of adaptive evolution in a segment of ORF1. The correlation between the high activity of L1 families and adaptive evolution could result from the coevolution of L1 and a host-encoded repressor of L1 activity.

326 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The results show that these methods select true-positive data elements much more accurately than classical approaches, and may be applied to integrate data from any existing and future technologies.
Abstract: Different experimental technologies measure different aspects of a system and to differing depth and breadth. High-throughput assays have inherently high false-positive and false-negative rates. Moreover, each technology includes systematic biases of a different nature. These differences make network reconstruction from multiple data sets difficult and error-prone. Additionally, because of the rapid rate of progress in biotechnology, there is usually no curated exemplar data set from which one might estimate data integration parameters. To address these concerns, we have developed data integration methods that can handle multiple data sets differing in statistical power, type, size, and network coverage without requiring a curated training data set. Our methodology is general in purpose and may be applied to integrate data from any existing and future technologies. Here we outline our methods and then demonstrate their performance by applying them to simulated data sets. The results show that these methods select true-positive data elements much more accurately than classical approaches. In an accompanying companion paper, we demonstrate the applicability of our approach to biological data. We have integrated our methodology into a free open source software package named pointillist.

325 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Assessment of the rapamycin-sensitive phosphoproteomes in various genetic backgrounds revealed both documented and novel TORC1 effectors and allowed us to partition phosphorylation events between Tap42 and Sch9, demonstrating that Sch9 is a master regulator of protein synthesis.
Abstract: The target of rapamycin complex 1 (TORC1) is an essential multiprotein complex conserved from yeast to humans. Under favorable growth conditions, and in the absence of the macrolide rapamycin, TORC1 is active, and influences virtually all aspects of cell growth. Although two direct effectors of yeast TORC1 have been reported (Tap42, a regulator of PP2A phosphatases and Sch9, an AGC family kinase), the signaling pathways that couple TORC1 to its distal effectors were not well understood. To elucidate these pathways we developed and employed a quantitative, label-free mass spectrometry approach. Analyses of the rapamycin-sensitive phosphoproteomes in various genetic backgrounds revealed both documented and novel TORC1 effectors and allowed us to partition phosphorylation events between Tap42 and Sch9. Follow-up detailed characterization shows that Sch9 regulates RNA polymerases I and III, the latter via Maf1, in addition to translation initiation and the expression of ribosomal protein and ribosome biogenesis genes. This demonstrates that Sch9 is a master regulator of protein synthesis.

325 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Alexander W. Bell1, Eric W. Deutsch2, Catherine E. Au1, Robert E. Kearney1, Ron Beavis3, Salvatore Sechi4, Tommy Nilsson1, John J.M. Bergeron1, Thomas A. Beardslee, Thomas Chappell, Gavin Meredith5, Peter J. Sheffield6, Phillip Gray, Mahbod Hajivandi5, Marshall Pope5, Paul F. Predki5, Majlinda Kullolli7, Marina Hincapie7, William S. Hancock7, Wei Jia, Lina Song, Lei Li, Junying Wei, Bing Yang, Jinglan Wang, Wantao Ying, Yangjun Zhang, Yun Cai, Xiaohong Qian, Fuchu He, Helmut E. Meyer8, Christian Stephan8, Martin Eisenacher8, Katrin Marcus8, Elmar Langenfeld8, Caroline May8, Steve A. Carr9, Rushdy Ahmad9, Wenhong Zhu10, Jeffrey W. Smith10, Samir M. Hanash, Jason J. Struthers11, Hong Wang11, Qing Zhang11, Yanming An12, Radoslav Goldman12, Elisabet Carlsohn13, Sjoerd van der Post13, Kenneth E. Hung14, David A. Sarracino15, Kenneth C. Parker14, Bryan Krastins15, Raju Kucherlapati14, Sylvie Bourassa16, Guy G. Poirier16, Eugene A. Kapp17, Heather Patsiouras17, Robert L. Moritz17, Richard J. Simpson17, Benoit Houle, Sylvie Laboissiere1, Pavel Metalnikov, Vivian Nguyen18, Tony Pawson18, Catherine C. L. Wong19, Daniel Cociorva19, John R. Yates19, Michael J. Ellison20, Ana Lopez-Campistrous20, P. D. Semchuk20, Yueju Wang21, Peipei Ping21, Giuliano Elia22, Michael J. Dunn22, Kieran Wynne22, Angela K. Walker23, John R. Strahler23, Philip C. Andrews23, Brian L. Hood24, William L. Bigbee24, Thomas P. Conrads24, Derek Smith25, Christoph H. Borchers25, Gilles A. Lajoie26, Sean C. Bendall26, Kaye D. Speicher27, David W. Speicher27, Masanori Fujimoto28, Kazuyuki Nakamura28, Young Ki Paik, Sang Yun Cho29, Min-Seok Kwon29, Hyoung Joo Lee29, Seul Ki Jeong29, An Sung Chung29, Christine A. Miller30, Rudolf Grimm30, Katy Williams31, Craig A. Dorschel32, Jayson A. Falkner23, Lennart Martens, Juan Antonio Vizcaíno 
TL;DR: Central analysis determined missed identifications, environmental contamination, database matching and curation of protein identifications as sources of problems in liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry–based proteomics.
Abstract: We performed a test sample study to try to identify errors leading to irreproducibility, including incompleteness of peptide sampling, in liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry-based proteomics. We distributed an equimolar test sample, comprising 20 highly purified recombinant human proteins, to 27 laboratories. Each protein contained one or more unique tryptic peptides of 1,250 Da to test for ion selection and sampling in the mass spectrometer. Of the 27 labs, members of only 7 labs initially reported all 20 proteins correctly, and members of only 1 lab reported all tryptic peptides of 1,250 Da. Centralized analysis of the raw data, however, revealed that all 20 proteins and most of the 1,250 Da peptides had been detected in all 27 labs. Our centralized analysis determined missed identifications (false negatives), environmental contamination, database matching and curation of protein identifications as sources of problems. Improved search engines and databases are needed for mass spectrometry-based proteomics.

324 citations


Authors

Showing all 1292 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
Younan Xia216943175757
Ruedi Aebersold182879141881
David Haussler172488224960
Steven P. Gygi172704129173
Nahum Sonenberg167647104053
Leroy Hood158853128452
Mark H. Ellisman11763755289
Wei Zhang112118993641
John Ralph10944239238
Eric H. Davidson10645447058
James R. Heath10342558548
Alan Aderem9924646682
Anne-Claude Gingras9733640714
Trey Ideker9730672276
Michael H. Gelb9450634714
Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
20233
202260
2021216
2020204
2019188
2018168