scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

Open University of Catalonia

EducationBarcelona, Spain
About: Open University of Catalonia is a education organization based out in Barcelona, Spain. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Context (language use) & Higher education. The organization has 1943 authors who have published 4646 publications receiving 64200 citations. The organization is also known as: Universitat Oberta de Catalunya & UOC.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: It is confirmed that the current topics linked to quality of information for patient education on YouTube are unclear and not standardized, and caution should be applied when using YouTube for health promotion and patient educational material.
Abstract: Background: Recent publications on YouTube have advocated its potential for patient education. However, a reliable description of what could be considered quality information for patient education on YouTube is missing. Objective: To identify topics associated with the concept of quality information for patient education on YouTube in the scientific literature. Methods: A literature review was performed in MEDLINE, ISI Web of Knowledge, Scopus, and PsychINFO. Abstract selection was first conducted by two independent reviewers; discrepancies were discussed in a second abstract review with two additional independent reviewers. Full text of selected papers were analyzed looking for concepts, definitions, and topics used by its authors that focused on the quality of information on YouTube for patient education. Results: In total, 456 abstracts were extracted and 13 papers meeting eligibility criteria were analyzed. Concepts identified related to quality of information for patient education are categorized as expert-driven, popularity-driven, or heuristic-driven measures. These include (in descending order): (1) quality of content in 10/13 (77%), (2) view count in 9/13 (69%), (3) health professional opinion in 8/13 (62%), (4) adequate length or duration in 6/13 (46%), (5) public ratings in 5/13 (39%), (6) adequate title, tags, and description in 5/13 (39%), (7) good description or a comprehensive narrative in 4/13 (31%), (8) evidence-based practices included in video in 4/13 (31%), (9) suitability as a teaching tool in 4/13 (31%), (10) technical quality in 4/13 (31%), (11) credentials provided in video in 4/13 (31%), (12) enough amount of content to identify its objective in 3/13 (23%), and (13) viewership share in 2/13 (15%). Conclusions: Our review confirms that the current topics linked to quality of information for patient education on YouTube are unclear and not standardized. Although expert-driven, popularity-driven, or heuristic-driven measures are used as proxies to estimate the quality of video information, caution should be applied when using YouTube for health promotion and patient educational material. [Interact J Med Res 2013;2(1):e6]

132 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The results suggest that the interactivity elicited by an e-learning environment unleashes imagery that in turn facilitates spatial presence and copresence as well as flow and offers novel knowledge on how higher education institutions can facilitate e-learners' continuance behaviour.

132 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The authors explored the social scientific networks informing Working Group III (WGIII) assessment of mitigation for the AR5 and highlighted the persistence and extent of North-South inequalities in the authorship of the report, revealing the dominance of US and UK institutions as training sites for WGIII authors.
Abstract: The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has completed its Fifth Assessment Report (AR5). Here, we explore the social scientific networks informing Working Group III (WGIII) assessment of mitigation for the AR5. Identifying authors’ institutional pathways, we highlight the persistence and extent of North–South inequalities in the authorship of the report, revealing the dominance of US and UK institutions as training sites for WGIII authors. Examining patterns of co-authorship between WGIII authors, we identify the unevenness in co-authoring relations, with a small number of authors co-writing regularly and indicative of an epistemic community’s influence over the IPCC’s definition of mitigation. These co-authoring networks follow regional patterns, with significant EU–BRICS collaboration and authors from the US relatively insular. From a disciplinary perspective, economists, engineers, physicists and natural scientists remain central to the process, with insignificant participation of scholars from the humanities. The shared training and career paths made apparent through our analysis suggest that the idea that broader geographic participation may lead to a wider range of viewpoints and cultural understandings of climate change mitigation may not be as sound as previously thought.

126 citations

Book
30 Mar 2017
TL;DR: The aim of this book is to provide an agile and flexible tool to introduce you to the MDSE world, thus allowing you to quickly understand its basic principles and techniques and to choose the right set of MDSE instruments for your needs so that you can start to benefit from MDSE right away.
Abstract: This book discusses how model-based approaches can improve the daily practice of software professionals. This is known as Model-Driven Software Engineering (MDSE) or, simply, Model-Driven Engineering (MDE). MDSE practices have proved to increase efficiency and effectiveness in software development, as demonstrated by various quantitative and qualitative studies. MDSE adoption in the software industry is foreseen to grow exponentially in the near future, e.g., due to the convergence of software development and business analysis. The aim of this book is to provide you with an agile and flexible tool to introduce you to the MDSE world, thus allowing you to quickly understand its basic principles and techniques and to choose the right set of MDSE instruments for your needs so that you can start to benefit from MDSE right away. The book is organized into two main parts. The first part discusses the foundations of MDSE in terms of basic concepts (i.e., models and transformations), driving principles, application scenarios, and current standards, like the well-known MDA initiative proposed by OMG (Object Management Group) as well as the practices on how to integrate MDSE in existing development processes. The second part deals with the technical aspects of MDSE, spanning from the basics on when and how to build a domain-specific modeling language, to the description of Model-to-Text and Model-to-Model transformations, and the tools that support the management of MDSE projects. The second edition of the book features: a set of completely new topics, including: full example of the creation of a new modeling language (IFML), discussion of modeling issues and approaches in specific domains, like business process modeling, user interaction modeling, and enterprise architecture complete revision of examples, figures, and text, for improving readability, understandability, and coherence better formulation of definitions, dependencies between concepts and ideas addition of a complete index of book content In addition to the contents of the book, more resources are provided on the book's website http://www.mdse-book.com, including the examples presented in the book.

125 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: A new numerical abstract domain called octahedron that represents constraints of the form (@?x"[email protected]?x"j>=k) is introduced that is based on a new kind of decision diagram called Octahedra Decision Diagrams (OhDD).

122 citations


Authors

Showing all 2008 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
Andrea Saltelli6518431540
Jose A. Rodriguez6359717218
Cristina Botella5540413075
Fatos Xhafa5269210379
Jaime Kulisevsky4821015066
William H. Dutton432777048
Angel A. Juan412845040
Aditya Khosla396150417
Jordi Cabot381065022
Jordi Cortadella382265736
Antoni Valero-Cabré37996091
Berta Pascual-Sedano34874377
Josep Lladós332714243
Carlo Gelmetti331593912
Juan V. Luciano331062931
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
University of the Basque Country
49.6K papers, 1M citations

82% related

University of Granada
59.2K papers, 1.4M citations

82% related

University of Seville
47.3K papers, 947K citations

82% related

Pompeu Fabra University
23.5K papers, 858.4K citations

82% related

Autonomous University of Barcelona
80.5K papers, 2.3M citations

81% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
202328
202286
2021503
2020505
2019401
2018343